Beck K H, Summons T G
Department of Health Education, University of Maryland, College Park 20742.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1987;13(1-2):181-98. doi: 10.3109/00952998709001508.
Over 2,000 high school students were surveyed with an anonymous questionnaire to determine their frequency of drunk driving, social context of alcohol consumption, beliefs about drunk driving, and quantity and frequency of alcohol consumed. About 10% of the sample was identified as drunk drivers and they were compared with non-drunk driving drinkers according to a number of measures of where and why they drank. The results revealed highly significant differences in the social context of alcohol consumption for beer, wine, and liquor consumption. Across all three beverage categories, the most important discriminating social context factors were drinking at a dormitory and drinking to get along better on dates. Beer and liquor consumption were more important than wine consumption for discriminating drunk drivers from the non-problem drinking high school population. Quantity and frequency measures of alcohol consumption along with belief measures about drinking and driving did not substantially increase the discrimination between the two groups, but significantly increased the predictive power in a multiple regression analysis including the social context of alcohol consumption items.
通过一份匿名问卷对2000多名高中生进行了调查，以确定他们酒后驾车的频率、饮酒的社会背景、对酒后驾车的看法以及饮酒量和饮酒频率。约10%的样本被认定为酒后驾车者，并根据他们饮酒的地点和原因的多项指标，将他们与非酒后驾车的饮酒者进行比较。结果显示，啤酒、葡萄酒和烈酒消费的饮酒社会背景存在高度显著差异。在所有三个饮料类别中，最重要的区分社会背景因素是在宿舍饮酒以及为了在约会时相处得更好而饮酒。对于区分酒后驾车者和无饮酒问题的高中生群体而言，啤酒和烈酒消费比葡萄酒消费更为重要。饮酒量和饮酒频率指标以及关于饮酒和驾车的看法指标，并没有大幅增加两组之间的区分度，但在包括饮酒社会背景项目的多元回归分析中，显著提高了预测能力。
