• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估基于计算机的培训和高保真模拟,以提高成人普通病房中脓毒症的早期识别。

Evaluation of computer-based training and high-fidelity simulation to improve early recognition of sepsis on the adult general ward.

机构信息

University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Duke University, School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Open. 2023 Jul;10(7):4880-4887. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1718. Epub 2023 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1002/nop2.1718
PMID:36879447
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10277437/
Abstract

This quality improvement project involved developing, implementing and evaluating an educational intervention using computer-based training (CBT) and high-fidelity simulation (HFS) to increase knowledge, confidence and compliance of nurses identifying sepsis. A one-group pretest-posttest design was used. Participants were nurses on a general ward of an academic medical centre. Study variables were measured over three timepoints: 2 weeks before, immediately after and 90 days after implementation. Data were collected from January 30, 2018, to June 22, 2018. SQUIRE 2.0 checklist for quality improvement reporting used. Improvements in knowledge of sepsis (F  = 18.14, p < 0.001, η  = 0.30) and confidence in early recognition of sepsis (F  = 13.67, p < 0.001, η  = 0.25) were found. Additionally, compliance with sepsis screening improved between the preimplementation and postimplementation period (χ  = 13.633, df = 1, p < 0.001). Overall, the nurses evaluated their experience with the CBT and HFS as strongly positive. When designing and implementing an educational intervention on sepsis, a process for follow-up which provides reinforcement should be considered to retain nurses' knowledge.

摘要

本质量改进项目涉及开发、实施和评估一项教育干预措施,使用基于计算机的培训 (CBT) 和高保真模拟 (HFS) 来提高识别脓毒症的护士的知识、信心和依从性。采用了单组预测试后测试设计。参与者为学术医疗中心普通病房的护士。研究变量在三个时间点进行测量:实施前 2 周、实施后即刻和 90 天后。数据收集于 2018 年 1 月 30 日至 2018 年 6 月 22 日期间进行。使用 SQUIRE 2.0 清单报告质量改进。发现脓毒症知识(F = 18.14,p < 0.001,η = 0.30)和早期识别脓毒症的信心(F = 13.67,p < 0.001,η = 0.25)均有所提高。此外,在实施前和实施后期间,脓毒症筛查的依从性有所提高(χ = 13.633,df = 1,p < 0.001)。总体而言,护士对 CBT 和 HFS 的体验评价非常积极。在设计和实施脓毒症教育干预措施时,应考虑后续跟进过程,提供强化措施,以保留护士的知识。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf0d/10277437/374a95b24d38/NOP2-10-4880-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf0d/10277437/374a95b24d38/NOP2-10-4880-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf0d/10277437/374a95b24d38/NOP2-10-4880-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of computer-based training and high-fidelity simulation to improve early recognition of sepsis on the adult general ward.评估基于计算机的培训和高保真模拟,以提高成人普通病房中脓毒症的早期识别。
Nurs Open. 2023 Jul;10(7):4880-4887. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1718. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
2
Promoting Nurses' Self-Efficacy in Advanced Cardiac Life Support Through High-Fidelity Simulation.通过高保真模拟提高高级心脏生命支持中的护士自我效能感。
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2022 Apr;53(4):185-192. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20220311-09. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
3
A comparative study of video lecture versus video lecture and high fidelity simulation for training nurses on the delivery of targeted temperature management after cardiac arrest.一项关于视频讲座与视频讲座加高保真模拟在培训护士进行心脏骤停后目标温度管理方面的比较研究。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2020 Mar;49:100829. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2019.100829. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
4
Effectiveness of high fidelity simulation versus low fidelity simulation on practical/clinical skill development in pre-registration physiotherapy students: a systematic review.高保真模拟与低保真模拟对预注册物理治疗专业学生实践/临床技能发展的有效性:一项系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019 Jun;17(6):1229-1255. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003931.
5
The effectiveness of branching simulations in improving nurses' knowledge, attitudes, practice, and decision-making related to sepsis assessment and management.分支模拟在提高护士对脓毒症评估和管理相关知识、态度、实践和决策方面的有效性。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Mar;110:105270. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105270. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
6
Impact of a sepsis educational program on nurse competence.脓毒症教育项目对护士能力的影响。
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2015 Apr;46(4):179-86. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20150320-03.
7
An audit of ward nurses' knowledge of sepsis.病房护士对脓毒症知识的一项审计。
Nurs Crit Care. 2007 Mar-Apr;12(2):86-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2007.00210.x.
8
High Fidelity Simulation Experience in Emergency settings: doctors and nurses satisfaction levels.急诊环境中的高保真模拟体验:医生和护士的满意度水平。
Acta Biomed. 2016 Nov 22;87(4-S):38-50.
9
Effects of situational simulation and online first-aid training programs for nurses in general medical wards: A prospective study.综合内科病房护士情景模拟与在线急救培训项目的效果:一项前瞻性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Jan;96:104621. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104621. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
10
Using Simulation With Deliberate Practice to Improve Pediatric ICU Nurses' Knowledge, Clinical Teamwork, and Confidence.运用模拟教学和刻意练习提高儿科 ICU 护士的知识水平、临床协作能力和自信心。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2020 Sep-Oct;54:58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2020.05.020. Epub 2020 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Latent profile analysis of empathy for pain and its associations with coping styles among nurses in China.中国护士疼痛共情的潜在剖面分析及其与应对方式的关联
BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 2;15(9):e101039. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101039.
2
Nursing Students' Perceptions and Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Education.护理专业学生对生成式人工智能在护理教育中的认知与应用
Nurs Rep. 2025 Feb 14;15(2):68. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15020068.
3
Evaluating the relationship between pain empathy, knowledge and attitudes among nurses in North China: a cross-sectional study.

本文引用的文献

1
Knowledge of Sepsis in Nursing Students-A Cross-Sectional Study.护理学生对脓毒症的认知-一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 26;18(23):12443. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312443.
2
Costs and length of sepsis-related hospitalizations in Taiwan.台湾地区败血症相关住院治疗的费用及住院时长。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May 29;99(22):e20476. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020476.
3
Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.全球、地区和国家脓毒症发病率和死亡率,1990-2017 年:全球疾病负担研究分析。
评估中国北方护士的疼痛共情、知识与态度之间的关系:一项横断面研究。
BMC Nurs. 2023 Oct 31;22(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01577-2.
Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):200-211. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7.
4
Prevalence, Underlying Causes, and Preventability of Sepsis-Associated Mortality in US Acute Care Hospitals.美国急性护理医院中与脓毒症相关的死亡率的流行率、根本原因和可预防性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Feb 1;2(2):e187571. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7571.
5
The global burden of sepsis: barriers and potential solutions.全球脓毒症负担:障碍与潜在解决方案。
Crit Care. 2018 Sep 23;22(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2157-z.
6
Epidemiology and Costs of Sepsis in the United States-An Analysis Based on Timing of Diagnosis and Severity Level.美国脓毒症的流行病学和成本:基于诊断时间和严重程度级别的分析。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Dec;46(12):1889-1897. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003342.
7
CE: Managing Sepsis and Septic Shock: Current Guidelines and Definitions.CE:脓毒症及脓毒性休克的管理:当前指南与定义
Am J Nurs. 2018 Feb;118(2):34-39. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000530223.33211.f5.
8
Screening for sepsis in general hospitalized patients: a systematic review.普通住院患者的脓毒症筛查:一项系统评价
J Hosp Infect. 2017 Aug;96(4):305-315. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 12.
9
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.拯救脓毒症运动:脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2016 年版。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):304-377. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
10
Hospital-related cost of sepsis: A systematic review.脓毒症的医院相关费用:系统评价。
J Infect. 2017 Feb;74(2):107-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Nov 21.