University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Duke University, School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Nurs Open. 2023 Jul;10(7):4880-4887. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1718. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
This quality improvement project involved developing, implementing and evaluating an educational intervention using computer-based training (CBT) and high-fidelity simulation (HFS) to increase knowledge, confidence and compliance of nurses identifying sepsis. A one-group pretest-posttest design was used. Participants were nurses on a general ward of an academic medical centre. Study variables were measured over three timepoints: 2 weeks before, immediately after and 90 days after implementation. Data were collected from January 30, 2018, to June 22, 2018. SQUIRE 2.0 checklist for quality improvement reporting used. Improvements in knowledge of sepsis (F = 18.14, p < 0.001, η = 0.30) and confidence in early recognition of sepsis (F = 13.67, p < 0.001, η = 0.25) were found. Additionally, compliance with sepsis screening improved between the preimplementation and postimplementation period (χ = 13.633, df = 1, p < 0.001). Overall, the nurses evaluated their experience with the CBT and HFS as strongly positive. When designing and implementing an educational intervention on sepsis, a process for follow-up which provides reinforcement should be considered to retain nurses' knowledge.
本质量改进项目涉及开发、实施和评估一项教育干预措施,使用基于计算机的培训 (CBT) 和高保真模拟 (HFS) 来提高识别脓毒症的护士的知识、信心和依从性。采用了单组预测试后测试设计。参与者为学术医疗中心普通病房的护士。研究变量在三个时间点进行测量:实施前 2 周、实施后即刻和 90 天后。数据收集于 2018 年 1 月 30 日至 2018 年 6 月 22 日期间进行。使用 SQUIRE 2.0 清单报告质量改进。发现脓毒症知识(F = 18.14,p < 0.001,η = 0.30)和早期识别脓毒症的信心(F = 13.67,p < 0.001,η = 0.25)均有所提高。此外,在实施前和实施后期间,脓毒症筛查的依从性有所提高(χ = 13.633,df = 1,p < 0.001)。总体而言,护士对 CBT 和 HFS 的体验评价非常积极。在设计和实施脓毒症教育干预措施时,应考虑后续跟进过程,提供强化措施,以保留护士的知识。