Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
Department of Precision Medicine Center/Department of Pathology and Translational Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Clin Mol Hepatol. 2023 Apr;29(2):496-509. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2022.0345. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: We used next-generation sequencing (NGS) to analyze resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) and retreatment outcomes in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection who failed direct-acting antiviral agent (DAA) treatment in South Korea.
Using prospectively collected data from the Korean HCV cohort study, we recruited 36 patients who failed DAA treatment in 10 centers between 2007 and 2020; 29 blood samples were available from 24 patients. RASs were analyzed using NGS.
RASs were analyzed for 13 patients with genotype 1b, 10 with genotype 2, and one with genotype 3a. The unsuccessful DAA regimens were daclatasvir+asunaprevir (n=11), sofosbuvir+ribavirin (n=9), ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (n=3), and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (n=1). In the patients with genotype 1b, NS3, NS5A, and NS5B RASs were detected in eight, seven, and seven of 10 patients at baseline and in four, six, and two of six patients after DAA failure, respectively. Among the 10 patients with genotype 2, the only baseline RAS was NS3 Y56F, which was detected in one patient. NS5A F28C was detected after DAA failure in a patient with genotype 2 infection who was erroneously treated with daclatasvir+asunaprevir. After retreatment, 16 patients had a 100% sustained virological response rate.
NS3 and NS5A RASs were commonly present at baseline, and there was an increasing trend of NS5A RASs after failed DAA treatment in genotype 1b. However, RASs were rarely present in patients with genotype 2 who were treated with sofosbuvir+ribavirin. Despite baseline or treatment-emergent RASs, retreatment with pan-genotypic DAA was highly successful in Korea, so we encourage active retreatment after unsuccessful DAA treatment.
背景/目的:我们使用下一代测序(NGS)分析了在韩国因直接作用抗病毒药物(DAA)治疗失败而患有慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染的患者的耐药相关替换(RAS)和再治疗结果。
利用来自韩国 HCV 队列研究的前瞻性收集数据,我们招募了 2007 年至 2020 年期间在 10 个中心因 DAA 治疗失败的 36 名患者;24 名患者中有 29 个血样可用。使用 NGS 分析 RAS。
对 13 名基因型 1b、10 名基因型 2 和 1 名基因型 3a 的患者进行了 RAS 分析。不成功的 DAA 方案为达卡他韦+阿舒瑞韦(n=11)、索非布韦+利巴韦林(n=9)、来迪帕韦/索非布韦(n=3)和格卡瑞韦/哌仑他韦(n=1)。在基因型 1b 的患者中,在基线时,10 名患者中有 8 名、7 名和 7 名患者分别检测到 NS3、NS5A 和 NS5B RAS,在 6 名患者中有 4 名、6 名和 2 名患者在 DAA 失败后分别检测到 NS3、NS5A 和 NS5B RAS。在 10 名基因型 2 的患者中,唯一的基线 RAS 是 NS3 Y56F,在一名患者中检测到。在因误治而接受达卡他韦+阿舒瑞韦治疗的基因型 2 感染患者中,在 DAA 失败后检测到 NS5A F28C。再治疗后,16 名患者的持续病毒学应答率达到 100%。
在基线时常见 NS3 和 NS5A RAS,在基因型 1b 中,DAA 治疗失败后 NS5A RAS 的发生率呈上升趋势。然而,在接受索非布韦+利巴韦林治疗的基因型 2 患者中,RAS 很少存在。尽管存在基线或治疗后出现的 RAS,但在韩国,用泛基因型 DAA 进行再治疗非常成功,因此我们鼓励在 DAA 治疗失败后积极进行再治疗。