Basile C, Coates J E, Ulan R A
Division of Nephrology and Immunology, University of Alberta Hospitals, Edmonton, Canada.
Am J Nephrol. 1987;7(4):264-9. doi: 10.1159/000167483.
We have previously reported that treatment of uremia by hypertonic hemodiafiltration (H-HDF) results in a more stable hemodynamic response as compared to standard hemodialysis (HD). The purpose of this study was to determine if plasma volume (PV) preservation was a significant factor in this response. Nine patients were studied during single treatment sessions of H-HDF and HD. Both sessions were 3 h in duration and the ultrafiltration rate and volume were matched. 10 microCi of 125I human serum albumin were injected 40 min before each session for measurement of PV. Changes in PV during the session were determined from the change in plasma albumin concentration and the hematocrit. The decrease in PV was significantly less during H-HDF. This was associated with a significantly higher plasma sodium and osmolality. The calculated effective osmolality during H-HDF was not only higher than in HD, but showed a significant increase at 2 and 3 h when compared to the baseline level (p less than 0.05). The calculated volume of extravascular mobilization was higher during H-HDF and is probably the mechanism of the PV preservation. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that PV is preserved during H-HDF better than during HD as a result of a more adequate plasma refilling; this appears to be mediated by an increased plasma effective osmolality.
我们之前曾报道,与标准血液透析(HD)相比,高渗血液透析滤过(H-HDF)治疗尿毒症可产生更稳定的血流动力学反应。本研究的目的是确定血浆容量(PV)的保持是否是这一反应中的一个重要因素。在H-HDF和HD的单次治疗过程中对9名患者进行了研究。两个治疗过程均持续3小时,超滤率和超滤量相匹配。在每个治疗过程开始前40分钟注射10微居里的125I人血清白蛋白以测量PV。根据血浆白蛋白浓度和血细胞比容的变化来确定治疗过程中PV的变化。在H-HDF过程中PV的降低明显较少。这与血浆钠和渗透压显著升高有关。H-HDF过程中计算出的有效渗透压不仅高于HD,而且与基线水平相比在2小时和3小时时显著升高(p<0.05)。H-HDF过程中血管外动员量的计算值更高,这可能是PV保持的机制。总之,本研究表明,由于血浆再充盈更充分,H-HDF过程中PV的保持优于HD;这似乎是由血浆有效渗透压升高介导的。