GEORGETWON UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER, WASHINGTON, DC, USA.
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY NEW ORLEANS COLLEGE OF LAW, NEW ORLEANS, LA, USA.
J Law Med Ethics. 2022;50(4):776-790. doi: 10.1017/jme.2023.19.
A robust body of research supports the centrality of K-12 education to health and well-being. Critical perspectives, particularly Critical Race Theory (CRT) and Dis/ability Critical Race Studies (DisCrit), can deepen and widen health justice's exploration of how and why a range of educational inequities drive health disparities. The CRT approaches of counternarrative storytelling, race consciousness, intersectionality, and praxis can help scholars, researchers, policymakers, and advocates understand the disparate negative health impacts of education law and policy on students of color, students with disabilities, and those with intersecting identities. Critical perspectives focus upon and strengthen the necessary exploration of how structural racism, ableism, and other systemic barriers manifest in education and drive health disparities so that these barriers can be removed.
大量研究支持 K-12 教育对健康和福祉的核心地位。批判性视角，特别是批判种族理论（CRT）和残疾批判种族研究（DisCrit），可以深化和拓宽健康正义对一系列教育不平等如何以及为何导致健康差距的探索。CRT 的反叙事故事讲述、种族意识、交叉性和实践方法可以帮助学者、研究人员、政策制定者和倡导者理解教育法律和政策对有色人种学生、残疾学生和具有交叉身份的学生的不同负面健康影响。批判性视角关注并加强了对结构性种族主义、能力主义和其他系统性障碍在教育中的表现以及如何导致健康差距的必要探索，以便消除这些障碍。
