Suppr超能文献

农业循环经济指标的定义及其在纳米肥料案例研究评估中的应用。

Definition of agronomic circular economy metrics and use for assessment for a nanofertilizer case study.

作者信息

Escribà-Gelonch Marc, Butler Gregory Dean, Goswami Arunava, Tran Nam Nghiep, Hessel Volker

机构信息

University of Lleida, Higher Polytechnic Engineering School, Pla de la Massa, Igualada, 08700, Spain.

South Australian No-Till Farmers Association (SANTFA), Clare, Australia FarmN Company, Clare, Australia.

出版信息

Plant Physiol Biochem. 2023 Mar;196:917-924. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.02.042. Epub 2023 Feb 24.

Abstract

Circular economy has become global priority, and fertigation make large contribution. Modern circular methodologies base their definitions, besides on waste minimisation and recovery, on the product usage U and lifetime L. We have modified a commonly used equation for the mass circularity indicator (MCI) to permit MCI determination for agricultural cultivation. We defined U as intensity for diverse investigated parameters of plant growth and L as the bioavailability period. In this way, we compute circularity metrics for the plantgrowth performance when exposed to three nanofertilizers and one biostimulant, as compared to no-use of micronutrients (control 1), and micronutrients supplied via conventional fertilizers (control 2). We determined an MCI of 0.839 for best nanofertilizer performance (1.000 denotes full circularity), while the MCI of conventional fertilizer was 0.364. Normalised to control 1, U was determined as 1.196, 1.121 and 1.149 for manganese, copper and iron-based nanofertilizers, respectively, while U was 1.709, 1.432, 1.424 and 1.259 for manganese, copper, iron nanofertilizers and gold biostimulant when normalised to control 2, respectively. Based on the learning of the plant growth experiments, a tailored process design is proposed for the use of nanoparticles with pre-conditioning, post-processing and recycling steps. A life cycle assessment shows that the additional use of pumps for this process design does not increase energy costs, while preserving environmental advantages related to the lower water usage of the nanofertilizers. Moreover, the impact of the losses of conventional fertilisers by missing absorption of plant roots, which is presumed to be lower for the nanofertilizers.

摘要

循环经济已成为全球优先事项,施肥灌溉做出了巨大贡献。现代循环方法的定义除了基于废物最小化和回收外,还基于产品使用量U和使用寿命L。我们修改了质量循环指标(MCI)的常用方程,以确定农业种植的MCI。我们将U定义为植物生长各种研究参数的强度,将L定义为生物可利用期。通过这种方式,我们计算了植物在接触三种纳米肥料和一种生物刺激剂时的生长性能循环指标,与不使用微量营养素(对照1)和通过传统肥料供应微量营养素(对照2)的情况进行比较。我们确定最佳纳米肥料性能的MCI为0.839(1.000表示完全循环),而传统肥料的MCI为0.364。相对于对照1,锰、铜和铁基纳米肥料的U分别确定为1.196、1.121和1.149,而相对于对照2,锰、铜、铁纳米肥料和金生物刺激剂的U分别为1.709、1.432、1.424和1.259。基于植物生长实验的经验,提出了一种针对纳米颗粒使用的定制工艺设计,包括预处理、后处理和回收步骤。生命周期评估表明,该工艺设计额外使用泵不会增加能源成本,同时保留了与纳米肥料较低用水量相关的环境优势。此外,推测纳米肥料因植物根系吸收不足而导致的传统肥料损失影响较小。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验