• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伊利诺伊州外科质量改进协作组织(ISQIC)的发展:实施21项要素以推动全州外科护理质量的提升。

Development of the Illinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC): Implementing 21 Components to Catalyze Statewide Improvement in Surgical Care.

作者信息

Bilimoria Karl Y, McGee Michael F, Williams Mark V, Johnson Julie K, Halverson Amy L, O'Leary Kevin J, Farrell Paula, Thomas Juliana, Love Remi, Kreutzer Lindsey, Dahlke Allison R, D'Orazio Brianna, Reinhart Steven, Dienes Katelyn, Schumacher Mark, Shan Ying, Quinn Christopher, Prachand Vivek N, Sullivan Susan, Cradock Kimberly A, Boyd Kelsi, Hopkinson William, Fairman Colleen, Odell David, Stulberg Jonah J, Barnard Cindy, Holl Jane, Merkow Ryan P, Yang Anthony D

机构信息

Illinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC) Coordinating Center, Chicago, IL.

Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine.

出版信息

Ann Surg Open. 2023 Mar;4(1):e258. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000258. Epub 2023 Mar 1.

DOI:10.1097/AS9.0000000000000258
PMID:36891561
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9987591/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In 2014, 56 Illinois hospitals came together to form a unique learning collaborative, the Illinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC). Our objectives are to provide an overview of the first three years of ISQIC focused on (1) how the collaborative was formed and funded, (2) the 21 strategies implemented to support quality improvement (QI), (3) collaborative sustainment, and (4) how the collaborative acts as a platform for innovative QI research.

METHODS

ISQIC includes 21 components to facilitate QI that target the hospital, the surgical QI team, and the peri-operative microsystem. The components were developed from available evidence, a detailed needs assessment of the hospitals, reviewing experiences from prior surgical and non-surgical QI Collaboratives, and interviews with QI experts. The components comprise 5 domains: guided implementation (e.g., mentors, coaches, statewide QI projects), education (e.g., process improvement (PI) curriculum), hospital- and surgeon-level comparative performance reports (e.g., process, outcomes, costs), networking (e.g., forums to share QI experiences and best practices), and funding (e.g., for the overall program, pilot grants, and bonus payments for improvement).

RESULTS

Through implementation of the 21 novel ISQIC components, hospitals were equipped to use their data to successfully implement QI initiatives and improve care. Formal (QI/PI) training, mentoring, and coaching were undertaken by the hospitals as they worked to implement solutions. Hospitals received funding for the program and were able to work together on statewide quality initiatives. Lessons learned at one hospital were shared with all participating hospitals through conferences, webinars, and toolkits to facilitate learning from each other with a common goal of making care better and safer for the surgical patient in Illinois. Over the first three years, surgical outcomes improved in Illinois.

DISCUSSION

The first three years of ISQIC improved care for surgical patients across Illinois and allowed hospitals to see the value of participating in a surgical QI learning collaborative without having to make the initial financial investment themselves. Given the strong support and buy-in from the hospitals, ISQIC has continued beyond the initial three years and continues to support QI across Illinois hospitals.

摘要

引言

2014年,伊利诺伊州的56家医院联合起来,组成了一个独特的学习协作组织——伊利诺伊州外科质量改进协作组织(ISQIC)。我们的目标是概述ISQIC头三年的情况,重点关注:(1)协作组织的组建和资金来源;(2)为支持质量改进(QI)而实施的21项策略;(3)协作组织的维持;(4)协作组织如何成为创新QI研究的平台。

方法

ISQIC包括21个促进QI的组成部分,其目标针对医院、外科QI团队和围手术期微观系统。这些组成部分是根据现有证据、对医院的详细需求评估、回顾先前外科和非外科QI协作组织的经验以及与QI专家的访谈而制定的。这些组成部分包括5个领域:指导实施(如导师、教练、全州范围的QI项目)、教育(如流程改进(PI)课程)、医院和外科医生层面的比较绩效报告(如流程、结果、成本)、网络(如分享QI经验和最佳实践的论坛)以及资金(如用于整个项目、试点拨款和改进奖励支付)。

结果

通过实施21个新颖的ISQIC组成部分,医院有能力利用其数据成功实施QI计划并改善护理。医院在努力实施解决方案时开展了正式的(QI/PI)培训、指导和辅导。医院获得了该项目的资金,并能够共同开展全州范围的质量计划。一家医院吸取的经验教训通过会议、网络研讨会和工具包与所有参与医院分享,以促进相互学习,共同目标是为伊利诺伊州的外科患者提供更好、更安全的护理。在头三年里,伊利诺伊州的外科手术结果得到了改善。

讨论

ISQIC的头三年改善了伊利诺伊州外科患者的护理,并使医院看到了参与外科QI学习协作组织的价值,而无需自身进行初始财务投资。鉴于医院的大力支持和参与,ISQIC在最初的三年之后仍在继续,并继续支持伊利诺伊州各医院的QI工作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96b/10431276/168ece8427c6/as9-4-e258-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96b/10431276/60c9064e6284/as9-4-e258-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96b/10431276/e6a9be503712/as9-4-e258-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96b/10431276/8a1e56ee5bf2/as9-4-e258-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96b/10431276/6c0e909419c2/as9-4-e258-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96b/10431276/634dcf8c0062/as9-4-e258-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96b/10431276/8a9454fecefa/as9-4-e258-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96b/10431276/168ece8427c6/as9-4-e258-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96b/10431276/60c9064e6284/as9-4-e258-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96b/10431276/e6a9be503712/as9-4-e258-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96b/10431276/8a1e56ee5bf2/as9-4-e258-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96b/10431276/6c0e909419c2/as9-4-e258-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96b/10431276/634dcf8c0062/as9-4-e258-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96b/10431276/8a9454fecefa/as9-4-e258-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b96b/10431276/168ece8427c6/as9-4-e258-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of the Illinois Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative (ISQIC): Implementing 21 Components to Catalyze Statewide Improvement in Surgical Care.伊利诺伊州外科质量改进协作组织(ISQIC)的发展:实施21项要素以推动全州外科护理质量的提升。
Ann Surg Open. 2023 Mar;4(1):e258. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000258. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
2
Evaluation of Changes in Quality Improvement Knowledge Following a Formal Educational Curriculum Within a Statewide Learning Collaborative.在全州范围的学习协作中,对正式教育课程后质量改进知识的变化进行评估。
J Surg Educ. 2020 Nov-Dec;77(6):1534-1541. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.04.018. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
3
Association Between Implementing Comprehensive Learning Collaborative Strategies in a Statewide Collaborative and Changes in Hospital Safety Culture.在全州协作中实施全面学习协作策略与医院安全文化变化之间的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Oct 1;155(10):934-940. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.2842.
4
Changes in Surgical Outcomes in a Statewide Quality Improvement Collaborative with Introduction of Simultaneous, Comprehensive Interventions.在引入同步、综合干预措施的全州质量改进合作中,手术结果的变化。
J Am Coll Surg. 2023 Jul 1;237(1):128-138. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000679. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
5
Evaluation of a novel mentor program to improve surgical care for US hospitals.评估一项旨在改善美国医院外科护理的新型导师计划。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Apr 1;29(2):234-242. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx005.
6
The physician mentored implementation model: a promising quality improvement framework for health care change.医生指导实施模式:一种用于医疗保健变革的有前景的质量改进框架。
Acad Med. 2015 Mar;90(3):303-10. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000547.
7
Project BOOST implementation: lessons learned.“助力项目”的实施:经验教训
South Med J. 2014 Jul;107(7):455-65. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000140.
8
A Framework to Harness the Power of Quality Collaboratives to Improve Perinatal Outcomes.利用质量协作的力量改善围产期结局的框架
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep;62(3):606-620. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000462.
9
The Irish national chronic obstructive pulmonary disease quality improvement collaborative: an adaptive learning collaborative.爱尔兰国家慢性阻塞性肺疾病质量改进合作组织:一种适应性学习合作组织。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Jan 8;13(1):e002356. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002356.
10
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.

引用本文的文献

1
A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a Collaborative-Wide Quality Improvement Project to Improve Postdischarge Venous Thromboembolism Chemoprophylaxis After Abdominopelvic Cancer Surgery.一项关于改善腹盆腔癌症手术后出院后静脉血栓栓塞化学预防的全协作质量改进项目的混合方法评估。
Ann Surg Open. 2025 Mar 4;6(1):e555. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000555. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Failure Mode Effects Analysis of Re-triage of Injured Patients to Receiving High-Level Illinois Trauma Centers.受伤患者重新分诊至伊利诺伊州高级创伤中心的失效模式影响分析。
Ann Surg. 2024 Oct 11. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006561.
3
Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy: A Quality Framework.

本文引用的文献

1
Association Between Missed Doses of Chemoprophylaxis and VTE Incidence in a Statewide Colectomy Cohort.全州结肠切除术队列中化学预防剂量遗漏与静脉血栓栓塞症发生率之间的关联
Ann Surg. 2021 Apr 1;273(4):e151-e152. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004349.
2
Association Between Implementing Comprehensive Learning Collaborative Strategies in a Statewide Collaborative and Changes in Hospital Safety Culture.在全州协作中实施全面学习协作策略与医院安全文化变化之间的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Oct 1;155(10):934-940. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.2842.
3
Evaluation of Changes in Quality Improvement Knowledge Following a Formal Educational Curriculum Within a Statewide Learning Collaborative.
肝动脉灌注化疗:质量框架
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Feb;31(2):701-704. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14515-y. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
4
Sustainable Quality Improvement Through Statewide Collaboratives.通过全州范围的合作实现可持续的质量改进。
Ann Surg Open. 2023 May 31;4(2):e293. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000293. eCollection 2023 Jun.
在全州范围的学习协作中,对正式教育课程后质量改进知识的变化进行评估。
J Surg Educ. 2020 Nov-Dec;77(6):1534-1541. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.04.018. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
4
Leveraging a Comprehensive Program to Implement a Colorectal Surgical Site Infection Reduction Bundle in a Statewide Quality Improvement Collaborative.利用综合项目在全州质量改进合作中实施结直肠手术部位感染减少捆绑包。
Ann Surg. 2019 Oct;270(4):701-711. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003524.
5
Pre-Operative, Intra-Operative, and Post-Operative Factors Associated with Post-Discharge Venous Thromboembolism Following Colorectal Cancer Resection.术前、术中及术后因素与结直肠癌切除术后出院后静脉血栓栓塞的关系。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Jan;24(1):144-154. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04354-2. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
6
Association Between Hospital Safety Culture and Surgical Outcomes in a Statewide Surgical Quality Improvement Collaborative.全州外科质量改进合作项目中医院安全文化与外科手术结果的关系。
J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Aug;229(2):175-183. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.02.046. Epub 2019 Mar 9.
7
Multi-institution Evaluation of Adherence to Comprehensive Postoperative VTE Chemoprophylaxis.多机构评估术后静脉血栓栓塞症综合预防治疗的依从性。
Ann Surg. 2020 Jun;271(6):1072-1079. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003124.
8
Evaluation of a novel mentor program to improve surgical care for US hospitals.评估一项旨在改善美国医院外科护理的新型导师计划。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Apr 1;29(2):234-242. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx005.
9
Development of a Conceptual Model for Surgical Quality Improvement Collaboratives: Facilitating the Implementation and Evaluation of Collaborative Quality Improvement.手术质量改进协作组织概念模型的开发:促进协作质量改进的实施与评估
JAMA Surg. 2016 Dec 1;151(12):1181-1183. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2817.
10
Evaluation of hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.对参与美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划的医院的评估。
Surgery. 2016 Nov;160(5):1182-1188. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.04.034. Epub 2016 Jun 11.