Janicsák Henrietta, Masszi Tamás, Reményi Péter, Ungvari Gabor S, Gazdag Gábor
Department of Psychiatry and Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Jahn Ferenc South Pest Hospital, Budapest, Hungary.
Department of Internal Medicine and Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Ideggyogy Sz. 2023 Jan 30;76(1-2):25-35. doi: 10.18071/isz.76.0025.
Despite the decrease in transplant-related mortality, patients who receive hematopoietic stem-cell transplants often suffer from short-and long-term morbidities, poorer quality of life, and psychosocial functioning deficits. Several studies have compared the quality of life and affective symptoms of patients after undergoing autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplants. Some studies have reported similar or greater quality of life impairments in allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell recipients, but the findings have been inconsistent. Our purpose was to examine the influence of the type of hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation on the quality of life and affective symptoms of patients.
The study sample comprised 121 patients with various hematological diseases who underwent hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation at St. István and St. László Hospitals, Budapest. The study had a cross-sectional design. Quality of life was evaluated using the Hungarian version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant scale (FACT-BMT). Anxiety and depressive symptoms were assessed using Spielberger's State and Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), respectively. Basic sociodemographic and clinical variables were also recorded. Comparisons between autologous and allogeneic recipients were analyzed using a t-test when the variables were normally distributed and a Mann-Whitney U test otherwise. A stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors that contributed to the quality of life and the affective symptoms in each group.
Quality of life (p=0.83) and affective symptoms (pBDI=0.24; pSSTAI=0.63) were similar between the autologous and allogeneic transplant groups. The BDI scores of allogeneic transplant patients indicated mild depression, but their STAI scores were similar to those of the general population. Allogeneic transplant patients with symptoms of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) experienced more severe clinical conditions (p=0.01), poorer functional status (p<0.01) and received more immunosuppressive treatment (p<0.01) than those without graft versus host disease. Patients suffering from graft versus host disease experienced more severe depression (p=0.01), and constant anxiety (p=0.03) than those without graft versus host disease. Quality of life was affected by depressive and anxiety symptoms and psychiatric comorbidity in both the allogeneic and autologous groups.
Graft versus host disease-related severe somatic complaints seemed to influence the allogeneic transplant patients' quality of life by inducing depressive and anxiety symptoms.
尽管移植相关死亡率有所下降,但接受造血干细胞移植的患者常遭受短期和长期的发病情况、较差的生活质量以及心理社会功能缺陷。多项研究比较了接受自体和异基因造血干细胞移植患者的生活质量和情感症状。一些研究报告称异基因造血干细胞移植受者的生活质量损害相似或更严重,但研究结果并不一致。我们的目的是研究造血干细胞移植类型对患者生活质量和情感症状的影响。
研究样本包括121例在布达佩斯的圣伊什特万医院和圣拉兹洛医院接受造血干细胞移植的各种血液疾病患者。该研究采用横断面设计。使用匈牙利版癌症治疗功能评估 - 骨髓移植量表(FACT - BMT)评估生活质量。分别使用斯皮尔伯格状态 - 特质焦虑量表(STAI)和贝克抑郁量表(BDI)评估焦虑和抑郁症状。还记录了基本的社会人口统计学和临床变量。当变量呈正态分布时,使用t检验分析自体和异基因受者之间的差异,否则使用曼 - 惠特尼U检验。进行逐步多元线性回归分析以确定导致每组生活质量和情感症状的危险因素。
自体和异基因移植组之间的生活质量(p = 0.83)和情感症状(pBDI = 0.24;pSSTAI = 0.63)相似。异基因移植患者的BDI评分表明有轻度抑郁,但他们的STAI评分与一般人群相似。有移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)症状的异基因移植患者比没有移植物抗宿主病的患者临床病情更严重(p = 0.01)、功能状态更差(p < 0.01)且接受更多免疫抑制治疗(p < 0.01)。患有移植物抗宿主病的患者比没有移植物抗宿主病的患者经历更严重的抑郁(p = 0.01)和持续焦虑(p = 0.03)。异体和自体组的生活质量均受抑郁和焦虑症状以及精神共病的影响。
移植物抗宿主病相关的严重躯体不适似乎通过诱发抑郁和焦虑症状影响异基因移植患者的生活质量。