• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

南达科他州农村地区皮肤病学治疗的出行距离。

Travel Distance for Rural South Dakota Dermatology Care.

机构信息

University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine, Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

Yankton Medical Clinic, Yankton, South Dakota.

出版信息

S D Med. 2022 Nov;75(11):504-508.

PMID:36893028
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nearly 40 percent of dermatologists in the U.S. practice in the 100 most population dense areas, with less than 10 percent practicing in rural areas. Rurality, delayed detection time, and increased travel distance have been associated with worse malignancy outcomes. Without their local rural dermatologist, we hypothesized patients would face significantly increased travel distance and be less likely to receive dermatological care.

METHODS

A survey was created to assess travel distance, likelihood to travel further for care, and use of primary care providers for dermatologic care. Eligible participants of the IRB approved study were patients of the only dermatology clinic in Yankton, South Dakota. Yankton is a town in southeastern South Dakota with a population of 14,687.

RESULTS

Overall, 100 surveys were completed. Most patients (53.5 percent) did not know where they would receive dermatologic care if the dermatology clinic was not available. The average patient would travel 42.6 miles further to the closest non-outreach dermatology clinics. Over 25 percent of patients were unlikely or not willing to travel further for care. As patient's age increased, so did their likelihood to travel further.

CONCLUSIONS

The data supports the hypothesis that without their local rural dermatologist, patients would face significantly increased travel distance and be less likely to receive dermatological care. Given the barriers to care in rural areas, it is imperative to proactively confront these challenges. Further studies are needed to assess for confounding factors in this dynamic and develop innovative solutions.

摘要

背景

美国近 40%的皮肤科医生在人口最密集的 100 个地区行医,不到 10%的医生在农村地区行医。农村地区、检测时间延迟和旅行距离增加与恶性肿瘤结局恶化有关。如果没有当地的农村皮肤科医生,我们假设患者将面临显著增加的旅行距离,并且不太可能获得皮肤科护理。

方法

创建了一项调查,以评估旅行距离、是否更有可能为了获得治疗而长途跋涉,以及是否使用初级保健提供者进行皮肤科护理。这项经机构审查委员会批准的研究的合格参与者是南达科他州扬克顿唯一皮肤科诊所的患者。扬克顿是南达科他州东南部的一个城镇,人口为 14687 人。

结果

总体而言,完成了 100 份调查。大多数患者(53.5%)不知道如果皮肤科诊所不可用,他们将在哪里获得皮肤科护理。平均每位患者将多行驶 42.6 英里前往最近的非外展皮肤科诊所。超过 25%的患者不太可能或不愿意长途跋涉去接受治疗。随着患者年龄的增长,他们长途跋涉的可能性也会增加。

结论

数据支持这样一种假设,即如果没有当地的农村皮肤科医生,患者将面临显著增加的旅行距离,并且不太可能获得皮肤科护理。鉴于农村地区存在护理障碍,积极应对这些挑战至关重要。需要进一步研究以评估这种动态中的混杂因素,并开发创新解决方案。

相似文献

1
Travel Distance for Rural South Dakota Dermatology Care.南达科他州农村地区皮肤病学治疗的出行距离。
S D Med. 2022 Nov;75(11):504-508.
2
South Dakota Dermatology: Urban vs Rural Wait Times and Dermatologist Density.南达科他州皮肤科:城市与农村的等候时间和皮肤科医生密度。
S D Med. 2024 Mar;77(3):113-118.
3
South Dakota Dermatology: Urban vs Rural Wait Times Survey and Dermatologist Density.南达科他州皮肤病学:城市与农村等待时间调查和皮肤科医生密度。
S D Med. 2023 Jun;76(suppl 6):s20.
4
Comparing Travel Distance to Care and Staging of Parotid Gland Malignancies in South Dakota and Surrounding States.比较南达科他州及其周边州的腮腺恶性肿瘤的就医距离和分期。
S D Med. 2023 Jan;76(1):32-34.
5
Travel distance and time to dermatology clinical trial sites: a cross-sectional geospatial analysis.旅行距离和时间到皮肤科临床试验地点:一项横断面地理空间分析。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2023 Jul;315(5):1461-1464. doi: 10.1007/s00403-023-02590-w. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
6
Smartphones Enable Teledermatology in South Dakota: An Overview and Primer for Primary Care Providers.智能手机助力南达科他州的远程皮肤病学:基层医疗服务提供者概述及入门指南
S D Med. 2015 Oct;68(10):449-53, 455.
7
Geographic access to health care for rural Medicare beneficiaries.农村医疗保险受益人的医疗保健地理可及性。
J Rural Health. 2006 Spring;22(2):140-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2006.00022.x.
8
Dermatology ECHO - an innovative solution to address limited access to dermatology expertise.皮肤科电子会诊——解决皮肤科专业知识获取受限问题的创新方案。
Rural Remote Health. 2018 Feb;18(1):4415. doi: 10.22605/RRH4415. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
9
Hospital choice of Medicare beneficiaries in a rural market: why not the closest?农村市场中医疗保险受益人的医院选择:为何不选择最近的医院?
J Rural Health. 1991 Spring;7(2):134-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.1991.tb00715.x.
10
Urban-rural disparities in office-based dermatological services in Taiwan - a nationwide survey.台湾地区门诊皮肤科服务的城乡差异——一项全国性调查
Rural Remote Health. 2018 Aug;18(3):4730. doi: 10.22605/RRH4730. Epub 2018 Aug 31.