Department of Hand Surgery, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Centre Chirurgical Emile Gallé, CHU Nancy, 49 Rue Hermite, 54000 Nancy, France.
Department of Hand Surgery, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Centre Chirurgical Emile Gallé, CHU Nancy, 49 Rue Hermite, 54000 Nancy, France.
Hand Surg Rehabil. 2023 Jun;42(3):203-207. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2023.02.008. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
The most common surgical procedure for the treatment of hypothenar hammer syndrome (HHS) is resection of the pathological segment followed by arterial reconstruction using a venous bypass. Bypass thrombosis occurs in 30% of cases, with various clinical consequences, ranging from no symptoms to reappearance of the preoperative clinical symptoms. We reviewed 19 patients with HHS who underwent bypass graft, to assess clinical outcomes and graft patency, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Objective and subjective clinical evaluation and ultrasound exploration of the bypass were carried out. Clinical results were compared according to bypass patency. At a mean follow-up of 7 years, 47% of patients had complete resolution of symptoms; symptoms were improved in 42% of cases, and unchanged in 11%. Mean QuickDASH and CISS scores were 20.45/100 and 28/100, respectively. Bypass patency rate was 63%. Patients with patent bypass had shorter follow-up (5.7 vs 10.4 years; p = 0.037) and a better CISS score (20.3 vs 40.6; p = 0.038). There were no significant differences between groups for age (48.6 and 46.7 years; p = 0.899), bypass length (6.1 and 9.9 cm; p = 0.081) or QuickDASH score (12.1 and 34.7; p = 0.084). Arterial reconstruction gave good clinical results, with the best results in case of patent bypass. Level of evidence: IV.
正中神经返支综合征(HH 综合征)最常见的治疗手术是切除病变段,然后使用静脉旁路进行动脉重建。旁路血栓形成的发生率为 30%,具有各种临床后果,从无症状到术前临床症状再次出现不等。我们回顾了 19 例接受旁路移植术的 HH 综合征患者,以评估临床结果和移植物通畅情况,随访时间至少为 12 个月。对旁路进行客观和主观的临床评估和超声检查。根据旁路通畅情况比较临床结果。平均随访 7 年后,47%的患者症状完全缓解;42%的患者症状改善,11%的患者症状无变化。平均 QuickDASH 和 CISS 评分为 20.45/100 和 28/100。旁路通畅率为 63%。旁路通畅的患者随访时间更短(5.7 年 vs 10.4 年;p=0.037),CISS 评分更好(20.3 分 vs 40.6 分;p=0.038)。两组间在年龄(48.6 岁和 46.7 岁;p=0.899)、旁路长度(6.1cm 和 9.9cm;p=0.081)或 QuickDASH 评分(12.1 分和 34.7 分;p=0.084)方面无显著差异。动脉重建可获得良好的临床结果,旁路通畅时效果最佳。证据等级:IV。