Computational Brain Anatomy (CoBrA) Laboratory, Cerebral Imaging Center, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Integrated Program in Neuroscience, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2023 Jun 1;44(8):3023-3044. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26259. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
Statistical effects of cortical metrics derived from standard T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images, such as gray-white matter contrast (GWC), boundary sharpness coefficient (BSC), T1-weighted/T2-weighted ratio (T1w/T2w), and cortical thickness (CT), are often interpreted as representing or being influenced by intracortical myelin content with little empirical evidence to justify these interpretations. We first examined spatial correspondence with more biologically specific microstructural measures, and second compared between-marker age-related trends with the underlying hypothesis that different measures primarily driven by similar changes in myelo- and microstructural underpinnings should be highly related. Cortical MRI markers were derived from MRI images of 127 healthy subjects, aged 18-81, using cortical surfaces that were generated with the CIVET 2.1.0 pipeline. Their gross spatial distributions were compared with gene expression-derived cell-type densities, histology-derived cytoarchitecture, and quantitative R1 maps acquired on a subset of participants. We then compared between-marker age-related trends in their shape, direction, and spatial distribution of the linear age effect. The gross anatomical distributions of cortical MRI markers were, in general, more related to myelin and glial cells than neuronal indicators. Comparing MRI markers, our results revealed generally high overlap in spatial distribution (i.e., group means), but mostly divergent age trajectories in the shape, direction, and spatial distribution of the linear age effect. We conclude that the microstructural properties at the source of spatial distributions of MRI cortical markers can be different from microstructural changes that affect these markers in aging.
皮质度量标准源自标准 T1 和 T2 加权磁共振成像 (MRI) 图像,例如灰白质对比度 (GWC)、边界锐度系数 (BSC)、T1 加权/T2 加权比 (T1w/T2w) 和皮质厚度 (CT),其统计学效应通常被解释为代表或受到皮质内髓鞘含量的影响,但几乎没有经验证据支持这些解释。我们首先检查了与更具生物学特异性的微观结构测量值的空间对应关系,其次比较了不同标记物之间与年龄相关的趋势,假设主要由髓鞘和微观结构基础相似变化驱动的不同测量值应该高度相关。皮质 MRI 标记物源自 127 名年龄在 18-81 岁的健康受试者的 MRI 图像,使用 CIVET 2.1.0 流水线生成的皮质表面来获得这些标记物。它们的总空间分布与基因表达衍生的细胞类型密度、组织学衍生的细胞结构以及在一部分参与者中获得的定量 R1 图谱进行了比较。然后,我们比较了它们线性年龄效应的形状、方向和空间分布的标记物之间与年龄相关的趋势。皮质 MRI 标记物的总体解剖分布通常与髓鞘和神经胶质细胞的关系更为密切,而不是神经元标志物。比较 MRI 标记物,我们的结果显示在空间分布(即组平均值)方面具有高度的重叠,但在形状、方向和线性年龄效应的空间分布方面,大多数年龄轨迹都存在差异。我们得出的结论是,源自 MRI 皮质标记物空间分布的微观结构特性可能与影响这些标记物老化的微观结构变化不同。