Zhu Ying, Shi Qiong, Peng Qi, Gao Yue, Yang Ting, Cheng Yu, Wang Hao, Luo Yetao, Huang Ailong, He Tong-Chuan, Fan Jiaming
Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of diagnostic Medicine, School of Laboratory Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, P.R. China.
department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, P.R. China.
Int J Mol Med. 2023 Apr;51(4). doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2023.5234. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
Following the publication of the above article, an interested reader drew to the authors' attention that the 'Sift80, Day 7 / 10% FBS' data panel in Fig. 1Ba looked strikingly similar to the 'Sift80, 2% BCS / Day 3' data panel shown in Fig. 1Bb. After having re‑examined their original data, the authors have realized that they inadvertently duplicated the data panel that correctly showed the results of the 'Sift80, Day 7 / 10% FBS' experiment in this figure. Therefore, the revised version of Fig. 1, now showing the correct data for the 'Sift80, 2% BCS / Day 3' panel, is shown on the next page. Note that the error made in assembling this figure did not affect the overall conclusions reported in the paper. All the authors agree with the publication of this corrigendum, and are grateful to the Editor of for allowing them the opportunity to publish this. They also apologize to the readership for any inconvenience caused. [International Journal of Molecular Medicine 44: 1653‑1666, 2019; DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2019.4321].
上述文章发表后，一位感兴趣的读者提请作者注意，图1Ba中的“Sift80，第7天/10%胎牛血清”数据面板与图1Bb中所示的“Sift80，2%牛血清白蛋白/第3天”数据面板惊人地相似。在重新检查原始数据后，作者意识到他们在该图中无意中复制了正确显示“Sift80，第7天/10%胎牛血清”实验结果的数据面板。因此，下一页展示了图1的修订版，现在显示的是“Sift80，2%牛血清白蛋白/第3天”面板的正确数据。请注意，组装此图时出现的错误并未影响论文中报道的总体结论。所有作者都同意发表这份勘误表，并感谢《国际分子医学杂志》的编辑给予他们发表此勘误表的机会。他们也为给读者带来的不便表示歉意。[《国际分子医学杂志》44: 1653 - 1666, 2019; DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2019.4321]
