Rheumatology and Immunology, Daping Hospital. Army Medical University, China.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2023 Nov;115(11):660-661. doi: 10.17235/reed.2023.9549/2023.
Since the outbreak of Coronavirus Disease 2019, the scientific community has acted promptly before many publications appeared in the scientific literature. It posed a question of whether the expedited research and publication process would impair the research integrity, further leading to the rise in retractions. Hence in this study, we aimed to examine the characteristics of retracted articles related to COVID-19 and provide some insight into the scientific publishing of COVID-19 literature.
In this study, by searching Retraction Watch on 10 March 2022, the largest database on retraction, we included 218 COVID-19-related retracted articles.
We found that the retraction rate of COVID-19 research was 0.04%. Of the 218 papers, 32.6% were retracted or withdrawn with a retraction notice giving no indication of the reason, and 9.2% due to honest mistakes made by authors. Retractions owing to misbehavior by authors comprised 33% of those retractions.
We came to the conclusion that the changed publication norms certainly led to a number of retractions that could have been circumvented, the post-publication review and scrutiny were also enhanced.
自 2019 年冠状病毒病爆发以来,科学界在许多科学文献发表之前迅速采取了行动。这就提出了一个问题,即快速的研究和出版过程是否会损害研究的完整性,进而导致撤回的增加。因此,在本研究中,我们旨在研究与 COVID-19 相关的被撤回文章的特征,并深入了解 COVID-19 文献的科学出版。
在这项研究中,我们通过在 2022 年 3 月 10 日搜索最大的撤回数据库 Retraction Watch,纳入了 218 篇与 COVID-19 相关的撤回文章。
我们发现 COVID-19 研究的撤回率为 0.04%。在这 218 篇论文中,32.6%的论文被撤回或撤回,并附有撤回通知,没有说明原因,9.2%的论文是由于作者的诚实错误。由于作者的不当行为而撤回的论文占撤回论文的 33%。
我们得出的结论是,改变的出版规范肯定导致了一些本可以避免的撤回,事后的出版审查和审查也得到了加强。