Edlinger Anna, Garland Gina, Banerjee Samiran, Degrune Florine, García-Palacios Pablo, Herzog Chantal, Pescador David Sánchez, Romdhane Sana, Ryo Masahiro, Saghaï Aurélien, Hallin Sara, Maestre Fernando T, Philippot Laurent, Rillig Matthias C, van der Heijden Marcel G A
Agroscope, Plant-Soil Interactions Group, Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Glob Chang Biol. 2023 Jun;29(11):3177-3192. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16677. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
Organic carbon and aggregate stability are key features of soil quality and are important to consider when evaluating the potential of agricultural soils as carbon sinks. However, we lack a comprehensive understanding of how soil organic carbon (SOC) and aggregate stability respond to agricultural management across wide environmental gradients. Here, we assessed the impact of climatic factors, soil properties and agricultural management (including land use, crop cover, crop diversity, organic fertilization, and management intensity) on SOC and the mean weight diameter of soil aggregates, commonly used as an indicator for soil aggregate stability, across a 3000 km European gradient. Soil aggregate stability (-56%) and SOC stocks (-35%) in the topsoil (20 cm) were lower in croplands compared with neighboring grassland sites (uncropped sites with perennial vegetation and little or no external inputs). Land use and aridity were strong drivers of soil aggregation explaining 33% and 20% of the variation, respectively. SOC stocks were best explained by calcium content (20% of explained variation) followed by aridity (15%) and mean annual temperature (10%). We also found a threshold-like pattern for SOC stocks and aggregate stability in response to aridity, with lower values at sites with higher aridity. The impact of crop management on aggregate stability and SOC stocks appeared to be regulated by these thresholds, with more pronounced positive effects of crop diversity and more severe negative effects of crop management intensity in nondryland compared with dryland regions. We link the higher sensitivity of SOC stocks and aggregate stability in nondryland regions to a higher climatic potential for aggregate-mediated SOC stabilization. The presented findings are relevant for improving predictions of management effects on soil structure and C storage and highlight the need for site-specific agri-environmental policies to improve soil quality and C sequestration.
有机碳和团聚体稳定性是土壤质量的关键特征,在评估农业土壤作为碳汇的潜力时,这些特征很重要,需要加以考虑。然而,我们对土壤有机碳(SOC)和团聚体稳定性如何在广泛的环境梯度下响应农业管理缺乏全面的了解。在此,我们评估了气候因素、土壤性质和农业管理(包括土地利用、作物覆盖、作物多样性、有机施肥和管理强度)对SOC以及土壤团聚体平均重量直径(常用于指示土壤团聚体稳定性)的影响,该评估跨越了欧洲3000公里的梯度范围。与相邻草地(具有多年生植被且几乎没有或没有外部投入的未开垦土地)相比,农田表土(20厘米)中的土壤团聚体稳定性(-56%)和SOC储量(-35%)较低。土地利用和干旱是土壤团聚作用的重要驱动因素,分别解释了33%和20%的变化。SOC储量最好由钙含量(解释变异的20%)来解释,其次是干旱(15%)和年均温度(10%)。我们还发现了SOC储量和团聚体稳定性响应干旱的类似阈值模式,在干旱程度较高的地点其值较低。作物管理对团聚体稳定性和SOC储量的影响似乎受这些阈值的调节,与旱地地区相比,非旱地地区作物多样性的积极影响更显著,作物管理强度的负面影响更严重。我们将非旱地地区SOC储量和团聚体稳定性较高的敏感性与团聚体介导的SOC稳定的更高气候潜力联系起来。所呈现的研究结果对于改进对土壤结构和碳储存管理效果的预测具有重要意义,并突出了制定因地制宜的农业环境政策以改善土壤质量和碳固存的必要性。