• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们将 2 周系统综述(2weekSR)方法扩展到更大、更复杂的系统综述:病例系列。

We extended the 2-week systematic review (2weekSR) methodology to larger, more complex systematic reviews: A case series.

机构信息

Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia.

Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 May;157:112-119. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.03.007. Epub 2023 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.03.007
PMID:36898508
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In 2019 we invented the 2-week systematic review (2weekSR) methodology, to complete full, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic reviews in approximately 2 weeks. Since then we have continued to develop and adapt the 2weekSR methodology for completing larger and more complex systematic reviews, including less experienced or inexperienced team members.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

For ten 2weekSRs, we collected data on (1) systematic review characteristics; (2) systematic review teams; and (3) time to completion and publication. We have also continued to develop new tools and integrate them into the 2weekSR processes.

RESULTS

The 10 2weekSRs addressed intervention, prevalence, and utilization questions, and included a mix of randomized and observational studies. Reviews involved screening from 458 to 5,471 references, and included between 5 and 81 studies. The median team size was 6. Most reviews (7/10) included team members with limited systematic review experience; three included team members with no prior experience. Reviews required a median of 11 workdays (range: 5-20) and 17 calendar days (range: 5-84) to complete; time from journal submission to publication ranged from 99 to 260 days.

CONCLUSION

The 2weekSR methodology scales with review size and complexity, offering a considerable time-saving over traditionally conducted systematic reviews without relying on methodological shortcuts associated with "rapid reviews."

摘要

目的

2019 年,我们发明了 2 周系统综述(2weekSR)方法,旨在大约 2 周内完成完整的、符合系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses,PRISMA)的系统综述。此后,我们继续开发和改进 2weekSR 方法,以完成更大、更复杂的系统综述,包括经验较少或没有经验的团队成员。

研究设计和设置

对于十项 2weekSR,我们收集了(1)系统综述特征;(2)系统综述团队;以及(3)完成和发表的时间的数据。我们还继续开发新工具并将其整合到 2weekSR 流程中。

结果

这十项 2weekSR 涉及干预、流行率和利用问题,包括随机和观察性研究的混合。综述涉及从 458 至 5471 篇参考文献的筛选,并包括 5 至 81 项研究。团队规模中位数为 6。大多数综述(7/10)包括系统综述经验有限的团队成员;有三个综述包括没有先前经验的团队成员。综述需要中位数为 11 个工作日(范围:5-20)和 17 个日历日(范围:5-84)完成;从提交期刊到发表的时间范围为 99 至 260 天。

结论

2weekSR 方法可以根据综述的规模和复杂性进行扩展,与依赖于与“快速综述”相关的方法学捷径相比,为传统进行的系统综述节省了大量时间。

相似文献

1
We extended the 2-week systematic review (2weekSR) methodology to larger, more complex systematic reviews: A case series.我们将 2 周系统综述(2weekSR)方法扩展到更大、更复杂的系统综述:病例系列。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 May;157:112-119. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.03.007. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
2
The 2-week systematic review (2weekSR) method was successfully blind-replicated by another team: a case study.另一个团队成功地对为期两周的系统评价(2weekSR)方法进行了盲法复制:一项案例研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Jan;165:111197. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.10.013. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study.在两周内使用自动化工具完成了全面的系统回顾:案例研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 May;121:81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.01.008. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
6
Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions.在医疗保健干预随机试验的系统评价中,因对结果和分析进行选择性纳入及报告而产生的偏倚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 1;2014(10):MR000035. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000035.pub2.
7
8
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
9
A Critical Analysis of Reporting in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in the Peyronie's Disease Literature.对佩罗尼病文献中系统评价和荟萃分析报告的批判性分析。
J Sex Med. 2022 Apr;19(4):629-640. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.01.008. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
10
Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.系统评价的总结:伞状综述方法的方法学发展、实施与报告
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):132-40. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000055.

引用本文的文献

1
DNA and RNA vaccines against tuberculosis: a scoping review of human and animal studies.DNA 和 RNA 结核病疫苗:人体和动物研究的范围综述。
Front Immunol. 2024 Oct 3;15:1457327. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1457327. eCollection 2024.
2
Conducting two evidence syntheses in six weeks - experiences with and evaluation of a pilot project.在六周内进行两项证据综合 - 试点项目的经验和评估。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02334-y.
3
Automation of duplicate record detection for systematic reviews: Deduplicator.
用于系统评价的重复记录检测自动化:Deduplicator。
Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 2;13(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02619-9.
4
Machine Learning Methods for Systematic Reviews:: A Rapid Scoping Review.系统评价的机器学习方法:快速范围综述
Dela J Public Health. 2023 Nov 30;9(4):40-47. doi: 10.32481/djph.2023.11.008. eCollection 2023 Nov.