Department of Environmental Health, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 3;20(5):4541. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054541.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize research by automating data analysis, generating new insights, and supporting the discovery of new knowledge. The top 10 contribution areas of AI towards public health were gathered in this exploratory study. We utilized the "text-davinci-003" model of GPT-3, using OpenAI playground default parameters. The model was trained with the largest training dataset any AI had, limited to a cut-off date in 2021. This study aimed to test the ability of GPT-3 to advance public health and to explore the feasibility of using AI as a scientific co-author. We asked the AI asked for structured input, including scientific quotations, and reviewed responses for plausibility. We found that GPT-3 was able to assemble, summarize, and generate plausible text blocks relevant for public health concerns, elucidating valuable areas of application for itself. However, most quotations were purely invented by GPT-3 and thus invalid. Our research showed that AI can contribute to public health research as a team member. According to authorship guidelines, the AI was ultimately not listed as a co-author, as it would be done with a human researcher. We conclude that good scientific practice also needs to be followed for AI contributions, and a broad scientific discourse on AI contributions is needed.
人工智能(AI)有潜力通过自动化数据分析、生成新的见解和支持新知识的发现来彻底改变研究。本探索性研究收集了 AI 对公共卫生的十大贡献领域。我们使用了 GPT-3 的“text-davinci-003”模型,使用了 OpenAI 游乐场的默认参数。该模型是用任何 AI 拥有的最大训练数据集训练的,但限于 2021 年的截止日期。本研究旨在测试 GPT-3 推进公共卫生的能力,并探索将 AI 用作科学合著者的可行性。我们要求 AI 提供结构化输入,包括科学引文,并对回复的合理性进行审查。我们发现,GPT-3 能够组装、总结和生成与公共卫生问题相关的合理文本块,阐明了自身有价值的应用领域。然而,大多数引文都是 GPT-3 纯粹发明的,因此是无效的。我们的研究表明,AI 可以作为团队成员为公共卫生研究做出贡献。根据作者指南,最终没有将 AI 列为合著者,因为这将与人类研究人员一起完成。我们的结论是,AI 的贡献也需要遵循良好的科学实践,并且需要就 AI 的贡献进行广泛的科学讨论。