Suppr超能文献

腰椎管狭窄症对骨质疏松症治疗的影响:三种口服双膦酸盐疗法的比较

Effect of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis on Treatment of Osteoporosis: Comparison of Three Oral Bisphosphonate Therapies.

作者信息

Park Hyung-Youl, Kim Ki-Won, Ryu Ji-Hyun, Kim Geon-U, Jung Ho-Young, Jung Youn-Sung, Lee Jun-Seok

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 03312, Republic of Korea.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 07345, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 3;12(5):2027. doi: 10.3390/jcm12052027.

Abstract

(1) Background: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) causes uncomfortable neuropathic symptoms, which can negatively affect osteoporosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of LSS on bone mineral density (BMD) in patients treated with one of three oral bisphosphonates (ibandronate, alendronate and risedronate) for initially diagnosed osteoporosis. (2) Methods: We included 346 patients treated with oral bisphosphonates for three years. We compared annual BMD T-scores and BMD increases between the two groups according to symptomatic LSS. The therapeutic efficacies of the three oral bisphosphonates in each group were also evaluated. (3) Results: Annual and total increases in BMD were significantly greater in group I (osteoporosis) compared to group II (osteoporosis + LSS). The total increase in BMD for three years was significantly greater in the ibandronate and alendronate subgroups than that in the risedronate subgroup (0.49 vs. 0.45 vs. 0.25, < 0.001). Ibandronate showed a significantly greater increase in BMD than that of risedronate in group II (0.36 vs. 0.13, = 0.018). (4) Conclusions: Symptomatic LSS may interfere with the increase in BMD. Ibandronate and alendronate were more effective in treating osteoporosis than risedronate. In particular, ibandronate was more effective than risedronate in patients with both osteoporosis and LSS.

摘要

(1) 背景:腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)会引发不适的神经病变症状,这可能对骨质疏松症产生负面影响。本研究的目的是调查LSS对最初诊断为骨质疏松症且接受三种口服双膦酸盐(伊班膦酸钠、阿仑膦酸钠和利塞膦酸钠)之一治疗的患者骨密度(BMD)的影响。(2) 方法:我们纳入了346例接受口服双膦酸盐治疗三年的患者。我们根据有症状的LSS比较了两组之间的年度BMD T值和BMD增加情况。还评估了每组中三种口服双膦酸盐的治疗效果。(3) 结果:与第二组(骨质疏松症 + LSS)相比,第一组(骨质疏松症)的年度和总BMD增加显著更大。伊班膦酸钠和阿仑膦酸钠亚组的三年总BMD增加显著大于利塞膦酸钠亚组(0.49对0.45对0.25,<0.001)。在第二组中,伊班膦酸钠的BMD增加显著大于利塞膦酸钠(0.36对0.13,=0.018)。(4) 结论:有症状的LSS可能会干扰BMD的增加。伊班膦酸钠和阿仑膦酸钠在治疗骨质疏松症方面比利塞膦酸钠更有效。特别是,伊班膦酸钠在患有骨质疏松症和LSS的患者中比利塞膦酸钠更有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fbf/10004629/cf6fbc9955bc/jcm-12-02027-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验