Beatty Mark W, Wee Alvin G, Marx David B, Ridgway Lauren, Simetich Bobby, De Sousa Thiago Carvalho, Vakilzadian Kevin, Schulte Joel
Research Service, VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Healthcare System, 4101 Woolworth Avenue, Omaha, NE 68105, USA.
Department of Adult Restorative Dentistry, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Dentistry, 4000 East Campus Loop South, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.
Materials (Basel). 2023 Feb 28;16(5):2023. doi: 10.3390/ma16052023.
Prosthesis discomfort and a lack of skin-like quality is a source of patient dissatisfaction with facial prostheses. To engineer skin-like replacements, knowledge of the differences between facial skin properties and those for prosthetic materials is essential. This project measured six viscoelastic properties (percent laxity, stiffness, elastic deformation, creep, absorbed energy, and percent elasticity) at six facial locations with a suction device in a human adult population equally stratified for age, sex, and race. The same properties were measured for eight facial prosthetic elastomers currently available for clinical usage. The results showed that the prosthetic materials were 1.8 to 6.4 times higher in stiffness, 2 to 4 times lower in absorbed energy, and 2.75 to 9 times lower in viscous creep than facial skin ( < 0.001). Clustering analyses determined that facial skin properties fell into three groups-those associated with body of ear, cheek, and remaining locations. This provides baseline information for designing future replacements for missing facial tissues.
假体不适以及缺乏类似皮肤的质感是患者对面部假体不满的一个原因。为了设计出类似皮肤的替代品,了解面部皮肤特性与假体材料特性之间的差异至关重要。该项目使用一种抽吸装置,在按年龄、性别和种族进行了均匀分层的成年人群体中的六个面部位置测量了六种粘弹性特性(松弛百分比、刚度、弹性变形、蠕变、吸收能量和弹性百分比)。对目前临床上可用的八种面部假体弹性体也测量了相同的特性。结果表明,假体材料的刚度比面部皮肤高1.8至6.4倍,吸收能量比面部皮肤低2至4倍,粘性蠕变比面部皮肤低2.75至9倍(<0.001)。聚类分析确定,面部皮肤特性分为三组——与耳部主体、脸颊和其余位置相关的特性。这为设计未来缺失面部组织的替代品提供了基线信息。