Laface Valentina Lucia Astrid, Musarella Carmelo Maria, Tavilla Gianmarco, Cambria Salvatore, Maruca Gina, Giusso Del Galdo Gianpietro, Spampinato Giovanni
Department of AGRARIA, Mediterranean University of Reggio Calabria, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Catania, Via A. Longo 19, 95125 Catania, Italy.
Plants (Basel). 2023 Mar 1;12(5):1083. doi: 10.3390/plants12051083.
This study aims to clarify the taxonomic doubts, which have varied over the centuries, on the only two endemic species of the genus growing in Italy: and . For this purpose, the main carpological characters of the two species were examined, analyzing the external morphological traits and their cross-sections. Fourteen morphological traits were identified, obtaining datasets for the two groups using 40 mericarps (20 per species). The obtained measurements were subjected to statistical analysis (MANOVA and PCA). Our results highlight that at least 10 of the 14 morphological traits analyzed support the distinction between and . In particular, the following carpological characters are very significant ways to distinguish between the two species: monocarp width and length (Mw, Ml), monocarp length from base to maximum width (Mm), stylopodium width and length (Sw, Sl), length/width ratio (l/w) and cross-section area (CSa). In particular, the fruit of is larger (Mw 1.61 ± 0.10 mm) than that of (Mw 1.27 ± 0.13 mm), the mericarps of the first species are longer (Ml 3.14 ± 0.32 vs. 2.26 ± 0.18 mm) and the cross-section area (CSa) of is larger (0.92 ± 0.19 mm) than that of (0.69 ± 0.12 mm). The results also highlight the importance of the morphological traits of the carpological structures for the specific discrimination of similar species. The findings of this study contribute to an evaluation of the taxonomic significance of this species within the genus , and also provide valuable information for the conservation of these two endemic species.
本研究旨在澄清数百年来一直存在的分类学疑问,这些疑问涉及生长在意大利的该属仅有的两种特有物种:[物种一]和[物种二]。为此,对这两个物种的主要果实学特征进行了研究,分析了其外部形态特征及其横切面。确定了14个形态特征,使用40个分果(每个物种20个)获得了两组数据集。对所获得的测量数据进行了统计分析(多变量方差分析和主成分分析)。我们的结果表明,在分析的14个形态特征中,至少有10个支持区分[物种一]和[物种二]。特别是,以下果实学特征是区分这两个物种的非常重要的方法:单果宽度和长度(Mw,Ml)、从基部到最大宽度的单果长度(Mm)、花柱基宽度和长度(Sw,Sl)、长宽比(l/w)和横截面积(CSa)。特别是,[物种一]的果实(Mw 1.61±0.10毫米)比[物种二]的果实(Mw 1.27±0.13毫米)大,第一个物种的分果更长(Ml 3.14±0.32对2.26±0.18毫米),并且[物种一]的横截面积(CSa)(0.92±0.19毫米)比[物种二]的(0.69±0.12毫米)大。结果还突出了果实学结构的形态特征对于相似物种的特定鉴别具有重要意义。本研究的结果有助于评估该物种在该属内的分类学意义,也为保护这两种特有物种提供了有价值的信息。