Laboratory of Intelligent Systems for Processing Spatial Data, Moscow State University of Geodesy and Cartography (MIIGAiK), Moscow 105064, Russia.
Department of Space Monitoring and Ecology, Moscow State University of Geodesy and Cartography (MIIGAiK), Moscow 105064, Russia.
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Feb 23;23(5):2499. doi: 10.3390/s23052499.
In recent years, different deep learning frameworks were introduced for hyperspectral image (HSI) classification. However, the proposed network models have a higher model complexity, and do not provide high classification accuracy if few-shot learning is used. This paper presents an HSI classification method that combines random patches network (RPNet) and recursive filtering (RF) to obtain informative deep features. The proposed method first convolves image bands with random patches to extract multi-level deep RPNet features. Thereafter, the RPNet feature set is subjected to dimension reduction through principal component analysis (PCA), and the extracted components are filtered using the RF procedure. Finally, the HSI spectral features and the obtained RPNet-RF features are combined to classify the HSI using a support vector machine (SVM) classifier. In order to test the performance of the proposed RPNet-RF method, some experiments were performed on three widely known datasets using a few training samples for each class, and classification results were compared with those obtained by other advanced HSI classification methods adopted for small training samples. The comparison showed that the RPNet-RF classification is characterized by higher values of such evaluation metrics as overall accuracy and Kappa coefficient.
近年来,不同的深度学习框架被引入到高光谱图像 (HSI) 分类中。然而,所提出的网络模型具有更高的模型复杂性,如果使用少样本学习,则不能提供高分类精度。本文提出了一种将随机补丁网络 (RPNet) 和递归滤波 (RF) 相结合的 HSI 分类方法,以获得有信息的深度特征。该方法首先用随机补丁卷积图像波段,以提取多层次的深度 RPNet 特征。然后,通过主成分分析 (PCA) 对 RPNet 特征集进行降维,并通过 RF 过程对提取的分量进行滤波。最后,将 HSI 光谱特征和获得的 RPNet-RF 特征结合起来,使用支持向量机 (SVM) 分类器对 HSI 进行分类。为了测试所提出的 RPNet-RF 方法的性能,在三个广泛使用的数据集上进行了一些实验,每个类只有少量的训练样本,并将分类结果与采用小训练样本的其他先进的 HSI 分类方法的结果进行了比较。比较表明,RPNet-RF 分类的总体精度和 Kappa 系数等评价指标的值更高。