• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

足底筋膜炎对行走时动态足底压力分布的影响:一项病例对照研究。

Effect of painful Ledderhose disease on dynamic plantar foot pressure distribution during walking: a case-control study.

机构信息

University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Groningen, the Netherlands.

University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Groningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Foot (Edinb). 2023 Sep;56:101990. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2023.101990. Epub 2023 Mar 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.foot.2023.101990
PMID:36905795
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Plantar pressure distribution during walking in patients with painful Ledderhose disease is unknown.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Do patients with painful Ledderhose disease have an altered plantar pressure distribution during walking compared to individuals without foot pathologies? It was hypothesized that plantar pressure is shifted away from the painful nodules.

METHODS

Pedobarography data of 41 patients with painful Ledderhose disease (cases, mean age: 54.2 ± 10.4 years) was collected and compared to pedobarography data from 41 individuals without foot pathologies (controls, mean age: 21.7 ± 2.0 years). Peak Pressure (PP), Maximum Mean Pressure (MMP) and Force-Time Integral (FTI) were calculated for eight regions (heel, medial midfoot, lateral midfoot, medial forefoot, central forefoot, lateral forefoot, hallux and other toes) under the soles of the feet. Differences between cases and controls were calculated and analysed by means of linear (mixed models) regression.

RESULTS

Proportional differences in PP, MMP and FTI showed increased values for the cases compared to the controls, especially in the heel, hallux and other toes regions, and decreased values in the medial- and lateral midfoot regions. In naïve regression analysis, being a patient was a predictor for increased- and decreased values for PP, MMP and FTI for several regions. When dependencies in the data were taken into account with linear mixed-model regression analysis, the increased- and decreased values for the patients were most prevalent for FTI at the heel, medial midfoot, hallux and other toes regions.

SIGNIFICANCE

In patients with painful Ledderhose disease, during walking, a shift of pressure was found towards the proximal and distal foot regions, while offloading the midfoot regions.

摘要

背景

足底压力分布在患有疼痛性莱德霍斯病的患者行走时是未知的。

研究问题

与无足部病理的个体相比,患有疼痛性莱德霍斯病的患者在行走时足底压力分布是否发生改变?据推测,足底压力从疼痛结节处转移。

方法

收集 41 例疼痛性莱德霍斯病患者(病例组,平均年龄:54.2±10.4 岁)和 41 例无足部病理患者(对照组,平均年龄:21.7±2.0 岁)的足底压力图数据。计算足底八个区域(足跟、内侧中足、外侧中足、内侧前足、中央前足、外侧前足、大脚趾和其他脚趾)的峰值压力(PP)、最大平均压力(MMP)和力-时间积分(FTI)。通过线性(混合模型)回归计算病例组和对照组之间的差异,并进行分析。

结果

病例组与对照组相比,PP、MMP 和 FTI 的比例差异显示出较高的值,特别是在足跟、大脚趾和其他脚趾区域,而在中足和外侧中足区域的值较低。在初始回归分析中,作为患者是 PP、MMP 和 FTI 几个区域值增加和减少的预测因素。当线性混合模型回归分析考虑到数据中的依赖性时,患者的增加和减少值最常见于足跟、内侧中足、大脚趾和其他脚趾区域的 FTI。

意义

在患有疼痛性莱德霍斯病的患者中,在行走时,发现压力向足部近端和远端区域转移,而中足区域则减轻了压力。

相似文献

1
Effect of painful Ledderhose disease on dynamic plantar foot pressure distribution during walking: a case-control study.足底筋膜炎对行走时动态足底压力分布的影响:一项病例对照研究。
Foot (Edinb). 2023 Sep;56:101990. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2023.101990. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
2
Plantar heel pain and foot loading during normal walking.正常行走时足底足跟疼痛与足部负荷
Gait Posture. 2015 Feb;41(2):688-93. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.01.025. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
3
The effect of eliminating leg length difference on plantar foot pressure distribution in patients wearing forefoot offloading shoe.消除腿长差异对穿着前足减压鞋患者足底压力分布的影响。
Foot (Edinb). 2017 Dec;33:39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
4
Analysis of Diabetic Foot Deformation and Plantar Pressure Distribution of Women at Different Walking Speeds.不同行走速度下女性糖尿病足变形及足底压力分布分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 19;20(4):3688. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043688.
5
Functional characterization of plantar pressure patterns in gait of typically developing children using dynamic pedobarography.利用动态足底压力测量技术对正常发育儿童步态足底压力模式的功能特征进行分析。
Gait Posture. 2021 Feb;84:267-272. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.12.018. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
6
Impact of foot progression angle on the distribution of plantar pressure in normal children.足前进角对正常儿童足底压力分布的影响
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2014 Feb;29(2):196-200. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.11.012. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
7
Predictors of barefoot plantar pressure during walking in patients with diabetes, peripheral neuropathy and a history of ulceration.糖尿病、周围神经病变及有溃疡病史患者行走时的赤足足底压力预测因素。
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 3;10(2):e0117443. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117443. eCollection 2015.
8
Impact of rocker sole footwear on plantar pressure distribution during standing and walking in adult obese women.摇底鞋对成年肥胖女性站立和行走时足底压力分布的影响。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Apr;42(7):927-930. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1512012. Epub 2018 Nov 25.
9
The relationship between foot posture and plantar pressure during walking in adults: A systematic review.成人行走过程中足部姿势与足底压力的关系:一项系统综述。
Gait Posture. 2018 May;62:56-67. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.02.026. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
10
Hardness and posting of foot orthoses modify plantar contact area, plantar pressure, and perceived comfort when cycling.足部矫形器的硬度和贴附方式会改变踩踏时的接触面积、足底压力和骑行时的舒适度。
J Sci Med Sport. 2018 Jul;21(7):691-696. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.11.013. Epub 2017 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of pain exacerbation on rear foot eversion and plantar pressure symmetry in women with patellofemoral pain: a cross sectional study.髌股关节疼痛女性中疼痛加剧对后足外翻和足底压力对称性的影响:一项横断面研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jan 3;26(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08198-z.
2
Ledderhose's Disease: An Up-to-Date Review of a Rare Non-Malignant Disorder.莱德霍斯病:一种罕见的非恶性疾病的最新综述
Clin Pract. 2023 Sep 28;13(5):1182-1195. doi: 10.3390/clinpract13050106.