Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison 53705.
Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850.
J Dairy Sci. 2023 May;106(5):3246-3267. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-22396. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
This analysis introduces a stochastic herd simulation model and evaluates the estimated reproductive and economic performance of combinations of reproductive management programs for both heifers and lactating cows. The model simulates the growth, reproductive performance, production, and culling for individual animals and integrates individual animal outcomes to represent herd dynamics daily. The model has an extensible structure, allowing for future modification and expansion, and has been integrated into the Ruminant Farm Systems model, a holistic dairy farm simulation model. The herd simulation model was used to compare outcomes of 10 reproductive management scenarios based on common practices on US farms with combinations of estrous detection (ED) and artificial insemination (AI), synchronized estrous detection (synch-ED) and AI, timed AI (TAI, 5-d CIDR-Synch) programs for heifers; and ED, a combination of ED and TAI (ED-TAI, Presynch-Ovsynch), and TAI (Double-Ovsynch) with or without ED during the reinsemination period for lactating cows. The simulation was run for a 1,000-cow (milking and dry) herd for 7 yr, and we used the outcomes from the final year to evaluate results. The model accounted for incomes from milk, sold calves, and culled heifers and cows, as well as costs from breeding, AI, semen, pregnancy diagnosis, and calf, heifer, and cow feed. We found that the interaction between heifer and lactating dairy cow reproductive management programs influences herd economic performance primarily due to heifer rearing costs and replacement heifer supply. The greatest net return (NR) was achieved when combining heifer TAI and cow TAI without ED during the reinsemination period, whereas the lowest NR was obtained when combining heifer synch-ED with cow ED.
本分析介绍了一个随机 herd 模拟模型,并评估了针对后备牛和泌乳牛的生殖管理方案组合的估计生殖和经济性能。该模型模拟了个体动物的生长、生殖性能、生产和淘汰,并将个体动物的结果整合起来,以代表 herd 动态的日常情况。该模型具有可扩展的结构,允许未来进行修改和扩展,并已集成到反刍动物农场系统模型(一种全面的奶牛场模拟模型)中。 herd 模拟模型用于比较基于美国农场常见实践的 10 种生殖管理方案的结果,这些方案包括发情检测(ED)和人工授精(AI)、同步发情检测(synch-ED)和 AI、定时 AI(TAI,5-d CIDR-Synch)方案的后备牛;以及 ED、ED 和 TAI(ED-TAI,Preshynch-Ovsynch)的组合以及泌乳牛再配种期间有无 ED 的 TAI(Double-Ovsynch)。该模拟在一个 1000 头奶牛(泌乳和干奶牛)的 herd 中运行了 7 年,并使用最后一年的结果来评估结果。该模型考虑了来自牛奶、销售牛犊和淘汰后备牛和奶牛的收入,以及来自配种、AI、精液、妊娠诊断以及牛犊、后备牛和奶牛饲料的成本。我们发现,后备牛和泌乳奶牛生殖管理方案的相互作用主要通过后备牛饲养成本和后备牛供应影响 herd 经济性能。当后备牛 TAI 和奶牛 TAI 在再配种期间不进行 ED 组合时,获得的净回报(NR)最大,而当后备牛 synch-ED 和奶牛 ED 组合时,获得的 NR 最低。