Suppr超能文献

网络荟萃分析饲料级和缓释尿素对泌乳奶牛的影响。

A network meta-analysis of the impact of feed-grade and slow-release ureas on lactating dairy cattle.

机构信息

Department of Veterinary Science, University of Parma, Via del Taglio, 10, 43126 Parma, Italy.

Departamento de Producción Animal y Salud de los Sistemas Productivos, Instituto de Producción Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la República, Ruta 1 km 42, CP 80100 San José, Uruguay.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2023 May;106(5):3233-3245. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-22786. Epub 2023 Mar 10.

Abstract

A network meta-analysis was conducted to determine the effects of feeding feed-grade urea (FGU) or slow-release urea (SRU) as a replacement for true protein supplements (control; CTR) in high-producing dairy cattle diets. Research papers were selected (n = 44) from experiments published between 1971 and 2021 based on the following criteria: dairy breed, detailed description of the isonitrogenous diets fed, provision of FGU or SRU (or both), high-yielding cows (>25 kg/cow per day), and results that included at least milk yield and composition, but data on nutrient intake, digestibility, ruminal fermentation profile, and N utilization were also considered. Most studies compared only 2 treatments, and a network meta-analysis approach was adopted to compare the effects among CTR, FGU, and SRU. Data were analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model network meta-analysis. Forest plots of milk yield were used to visualize the estimated effect size of treatments. Cows included in the study produced 32.9 ± 5.7 L/d of milk, 3.46 ± 5.0% of fat, and 3.11 ± 0.2% of protein with an intake of 22.1 ± 3.45 kg of dry matter. Average diet composition was 1.65 ± 0.07 Mcal of net energy for lactation, 16.4 ± 1.45% CP, 30.8 ± 5.91% neutral detergent fiber, and 23.0 ± 4.62% starch. Average supply of FGU was 209 g/cow per day, whereas the average supply of SRU was 204 g/cow per day. With some exceptions, feeding FGU and SRU did not affect nutrient intake and digestibility, N utilization, and milk yield and composition. However, the FGU reduced the acetate proportion (61.6 vs. 59.7 mol/100 mol) and the SRU reduced the butyrate proportion (12.4 vs. 11.9 mol/100 mol) compared with CTR. Ruminal ammonia-N concentration increased from 8.47 to 11.5 and 9.3 mg/dL in CTR, FGU, and SRU, respectively. Urinary nitrogen excretion increased from 171 to 198 g/d in CTR versus the 2 urea treatments, respectively. The use of moderate doses of FGU in high-producing dairy cows may be justified based on its lower cost.

摘要

采用网络荟萃分析来确定在高生产奶牛日粮中用饲料级尿素(FGU)或缓释尿素(SRU)替代真蛋白补充剂(对照;CTRL)的效果。根据以下标准从 1971 年至 2021 年发表的实验中选择研究论文(n=44):奶牛品种,详细描述喂养的等氮日粮,FGU 或 SRU 的供应(或两者),高产奶牛(>25 公斤/奶牛/天),并包含至少产奶量和组成的数据,但也考虑了养分摄入量、消化率、瘤胃发酵谱和 N 利用率的数据。大多数研究仅比较了 2 种处理方法,因此采用网络荟萃分析方法来比较 CTR、FGU 和 SRU 的效果。使用广义线性混合模型网络荟萃分析对数据进行分析。产奶量的森林图用于可视化处理效果的估计大小。研究中包含的奶牛每天产奶 32.9±5.7 升,脂肪 3.46±5.0%,蛋白质 3.11±0.2%,干物质摄入量为 22.1±3.45 公斤。平均日粮组成分别为泌乳净能 1.65±0.07 Mcal、16.4±1.45%CP、30.8±5.91%中性洗涤纤维和 23.0±4.62%淀粉。FGU 的平均供应量为 209 克/奶牛/天,而 SRU 的平均供应量为 204 克/奶牛/天。除了一些例外,饲喂 FGU 和 SRU 并不影响养分摄入量和消化率、N 利用率以及产奶量和组成。然而,FGU 降低了乙酸比例(61.6 比 59.7 摩尔/100 摩尔),而 SRU 降低了丁酸比例(12.4 比 11.9 摩尔/100 摩尔)与 CTR 相比。与 CTR 相比,瘤胃氨氮浓度分别从 8.47 增加到 11.5 和 9.3 毫克/分升,FGU 和 SRU。在 CTR 中,与 2 种尿素处理相比,尿液氮排泄量分别从 171 增加到 198 克/天。基于其较低的成本,在高产奶牛中使用适量的 FGU 可能是合理的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验