Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Centre for Human Resources and Education, the Capital Region of Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
The Mobile Emergency Care Unit, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; The Prehospital Research Unit, Region of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Injury. 2023 May;54(5):1321-1329. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.02.048. Epub 2023 Feb 26.
Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is an emerging and potentially life-saving procedure, necessitating qualified operators in an increasing number of centres. The procedure shares technical elements with other vascular access procedures using the Seldinger technique, which is mastered by doctors not only in endovascular specialties but also in trauma surgery, emergency medicine, and anaesthesiology. We hypothesised that doctors mastering the Seldinger technique (experienced anaesthesiologist) would learn the technical aspects of REBOA with limited training and remain technically superior to doctors unfamiliar with the Seldinger technique (novice residents) given similar training.
This was a prospective trial of an educational intervention. Three groups of doctors were enroled: novice residents, experienced anaesthesiologists, and endovascular experts. The novices and the anaesthesiologists completed 2.5 h of simulation-based REBOA training. Their skills were tested before and 8-12 weeks after training using a standardised simulated scenario. The endovascular experts, constituting a reference group, were equivalently tested. All performances were video recorded and rated by three blinded experts using a validated assessment tool for REBOA (REBOA-RATE). Performances were compared between groups and with a previously published pass/fail cutoff.
Sixteen novices, 13 board-certified specialists in anaesthesiology, and 13 endovascular experts participated. Before training, the anaesthesiologists outperformed the novices by 30 percentage points of the maximum REBOA-RATE score (56% (SD 14.0) vs 26% (SD 17%), p<0.01). After training, there was no difference in skills between the two groups (78% (SD 11%) vs 78 (SD 14%), p = 0.93). Neither group reached the endovascular experts' skill level (89% (SD 7%), p<0.05).
For doctors mastering the Seldinger technique, there was an initial inter-procedural transfer of skills advantage when performing REBOA. However, after identical simulation-based training, novices performed equally well to anaesthesiologists, indicating that vascular access experience is not a prerequisite to learning the technical aspects of REBOA. Both groups would need more training to reach technical proficiency.
主动脉球囊阻断复苏术(REBOA)是一种新兴的、具有潜在救生能力的手术,在越来越多的中心需要有合格的操作人员。该手术与使用 Seldinger 技术的其他血管入路手术具有技术要素,掌握这一技术的不仅有血管内专科医生,还有创伤外科、急诊医学和麻醉学医生。我们假设,掌握 Seldinger 技术的医生(有经验的麻醉师)经过有限的培训就能学习 REBOA 的技术方面,并且在接受类似培训的情况下,其技术水平仍将优于不熟悉 Seldinger 技术的医生(新手住院医师)。
这是一项教育干预的前瞻性试验。纳入了三组医生:新手住院医师、有经验的麻醉师和血管内专家。新手和麻醉师完成了 2.5 小时的基于模拟的 REBOA 培训。他们的技能在培训前和 8-12 周后使用标准化模拟场景进行测试。血管内专家作为参考组,接受了等效测试。所有表现均通过视频记录,并由三位使用经过验证的 REBOA 评估工具(REBOA-RATE)的盲评专家进行评分。比较了各组之间的表现以及之前发表的通过/失败标准。
16 名新手、13 名经过认证的麻醉学专家和 13 名血管内专家参与了该研究。在培训之前,麻醉师的 REBOA-RATE 评分比新手高出 30 个百分点(56%(SD 14.0)与 26%(SD 17%),p<0.01)。培训后,两组的技能没有差异(78%(SD 11%)与 78%(SD 14%),p=0.93)。两组都没有达到血管内专家的技能水平(89%(SD 7%),p<0.05)。
对于掌握 Seldinger 技术的医生来说,在进行 REBOA 时,初始存在程序性技能转移优势。然而,经过相同的基于模拟的培训后,新手的表现与麻醉师相当,表明血管入路经验不是学习 REBOA 技术方面的先决条件。两组都需要更多的培训才能达到技术熟练程度。