• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价 GRADE 在牙科系统评价中的应用及其对结论的影响:一项方法学研究方案。

Evaluation of the use of GRADE in dentistry systematic reviews and its impact on conclusions: a protocol for a methodological study.

机构信息

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4L8, Canada.

Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 3359 Mississauga Rd, Mississauga, Ontario, L5L 1C6, Canada.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 13;12(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02199-0.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-023-02199-0
PMID:36907896
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10009977/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a growing body of evidence of systematic reviews (SRs) with varying degrees of methodological quality. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach allows SR authors to assess the certainty of the evidence they found and transparently relay their conclusions. As there appears to be infrequent utilization of GRADE in the field of dentistry, to identify the impact of GRADE, the aim of this study is to evaluate the use of GRADE in the dental literature and determine whether SRs that use GRADE differ from those that do not with respect to their conclusions.

METHODS/DESIGN: We will search Ovid MEDLINE for SRs published from 2016 to the present. We will conduct both screening and data extraction independently and in duplicate and use pre-piloted, standardized forms for data extraction. We will determine the frequency of the use of GRADE and the varying levels of certainty in the current literature and evaluate whether GRADE is being used appropriately. We will also evaluate whether SRs not using GRADE differ from those that use GRADE with regard to methodological quality. We will also determine whether the conclusions of SRs that do not use GRADE would change had GRADE been utilized. Additionally, we will evaluate whether SRs using GRADE are more likely to formulate appropriate conclusions compared to SRs that do not use it.

DISCUSSION

This study will investigate the frequency of GRADE assessments in dentistry SRs and the impact of GRADE assessments on the conclusions of a SR. It has important implications for both SR authors and users of this type of literature.

摘要

背景

越来越多的系统评价(SR)具有不同程度的方法学质量。推荐分级评估、制定与评价(GRADE)方法允许 SR 作者评估他们发现的证据的确定性,并透明地传达他们的结论。由于在牙科领域似乎很少使用 GRADE,为了确定 GRADE 的影响,本研究旨在评估 GRADE 在牙科文献中的使用情况,并确定使用 GRADE 的 SR 是否与不使用 GRADE 的 SR 在结论上有所不同。

方法/设计:我们将在 Ovid MEDLINE 中搜索 2016 年至今发表的 SR。我们将独立并重复进行筛选和数据提取,并使用预先制定的标准化表格进行数据提取。我们将确定当前文献中 GRADE 的使用频率和不同的确定性水平,并评估 GRADE 是否得到了正确使用。我们还将评估不使用 GRADE 的 SR 是否与使用 GRADE 的 SR 在方法学质量方面存在差异。我们还将确定不使用 GRADE 的 SR 的结论是否会因使用 GRADE 而改变。此外,我们将评估使用 GRADE 的 SR 是否比不使用 GRADE 的 SR 更有可能得出适当的结论。

讨论

本研究将调查 GRADE 评估在牙科 SR 中的频率以及 GRADE 评估对 SR 结论的影响。这对这类型文献的 SR 作者和使用者都具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the use of GRADE in dentistry systematic reviews and its impact on conclusions: a protocol for a methodological study.评价 GRADE 在牙科系统评价中的应用及其对结论的影响:一项方法学研究方案。
Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 13;12(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02199-0.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
One-Third of Systematic Reviews in Rehabilitation Applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) System to Evaluate Certainty of Evidence: A Meta-Research Study.三分之一的康复系统评价应用推荐意见评估、制定与评价(GRADE)系统来评估证据的确定性:一项元研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Mar;104(3):410-417. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.09.005. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
4
Toolkit of methodological resources to conduct systematic reviews.进行系统评价的方法学资源工具包。
F1000Res. 2020 Feb 4;9:82. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.22032.3. eCollection 2020.
5
Systematic reviews in restorative dentistry: discussing relevant aspects.修复牙科的系统评价:讨论相关方面。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019 May;31(3):222-232. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12463. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
6
Gray literature in systematic reviews on population health in the Middle East and North Africa: protocol of an overview of systematic reviews and evidence mapping.中东和北非人口健康系统评价中的灰色文献:系统评价和证据图谱概述的方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 18;7(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0751-4.
7
Interventions during pregnancy to prevent preterm birth: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews.孕期预防早产的干预措施:Cochrane系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 14;11(11):CD012505. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012505.pub2.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Scalp acupuncture for stroke: A protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis.头皮针刺治疗中风:系统评价和荟萃分析概述的方案。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Nov 4;101(44):e31472. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031472.
10
Characteristics of the sources, evaluation, and grading of the certainty of evidence in systematic reviews in public health: A methodological study.系统评价中公共卫生证据确定性的来源、评估和分级特征:一项方法学研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 30;11:998588. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.998588. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
GRADE guidelines 32: GRADE offers guidance on choosing targets of GRADE certainty of evidence ratings.GRADE 指南 32:GRADE 提供了关于选择 GRADE 证据确定性评级目标的指导。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Sep;137:163-175. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.026. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
2
Methodological quality and risk of bias in orthodontic systematic reviews using AMSTAR and ROBIS.使用 AMSTAR 和 ROBIS 评估正畸系统评价的方法学质量和偏倚风险。
Eur J Orthod. 2021 Oct 4;43(5):544-550. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjaa074.
3
GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions.GRADE 指南 26:用于沟通干预措施系统评价结果的信息性陈述。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Mar;119:126-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.014. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
4
Assessment of Publication Trends of Systematic Reviews and Randomized Clinical Trials, 1995 to 2017.1995年至2017年系统评价和随机临床试验的发表趋势评估
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Nov 1;179(11):1593-1594. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.3013.
5
Methodological quality and risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of treatments for peri-implantitis.系统评价治疗种植体周围炎的方法学质量和偏倚风险评估。
J Periodontal Res. 2019 Aug;54(4):374-387. doi: 10.1111/jre.12638. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
6
Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? We are not sure.系统评价和荟萃分析仍然是有用的研究吗?我们不确定。
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Apr;44(4):518-520. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-5039-y. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
7
GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence.GRADE 指南:18. ROBINS-I 及其他评估非随机研究偏倚风险的工具应如何用于评估证据体的确定性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jul;111:105-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
8
Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect.在缺乏单一效应估计值的情况下对证据的确定性进行评级。
Evid Based Med. 2017 Jun;22(3):85-87. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110668. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
9
The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.冗余、误导性及存在冲突的系统评价和Meta分析的大量产出。
Milbank Q. 2016 Sep;94(3):485-514. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12210.
10
Evaluation of risk of bias assessment of trials in systematic reviews of oral health interventions, 1991-2014: A methodology study.1991 - 2014年口腔健康干预系统评价中试验的偏倚风险评估:一项方法学研究
J Am Dent Assoc. 2016 Sep;147(9):720-728.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2016.03.017. Epub 2016 May 4.