O'Leary Chris, Teixeira Ligia, Coren Esther, Kiss Zsolt, Roberts Anton, Amitage Harry
Policy Evaluation and Research Unit Manchester Metropolitan University Manchester UK.
Centre for Homelessness Impact London UK.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 25;18(4):e1290. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1290. eCollection 2022 Dec.
This systematic review is part of a broader evidence synthesis which aims to produce two systematic reviews to address a significant gap in the evidence base identified by Luchenski et al. (2018) and by (White, 2018). The first review (which is the subject of this protocol) will use meta-analysis to examine the effectiveness of different psychosocial interventions in (1) reducing problematic substance use; (2) improving mental health; and (3) improving housing stability for adults experiencing homelessness. The second review (which is covered by a separate title registration and protocol) will be of the experiences of adults experiencing homelessness when accessing or using psychosocial interventions, and will be a qualitative evidence synthesis using thematic synthesis (Thomas & Harden, 2008).
本系统评价是一项更广泛证据综合的一部分,该证据综合旨在进行两项系统评价,以填补Luchenski等人(2018年)和White(2018年)所确定的证据基础中的重大空白。第一项评价(即本方案的主题)将使用荟萃分析来检验不同心理社会干预措施在以下方面的有效性:(1)减少物质使用问题;(2)改善心理健康;(3)改善无家可归成年人的住房稳定性。第二项评价(由单独的标题注册和方案涵盖)将关注无家可归成年人在获取或使用心理社会干预措施时的经历,并将采用主题综合法(Thomas & Harden,2008年)进行定性证据综合。