Horvath Sabrina, Arunachalam Sudha
Medical University of South Carolina.
New York University.
Res Sq. 2023 Mar 2:rs.3.rs-2613423. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2613423/v1.
Using eye-tracking, we assessed the receptive verb vocabularies of late talkers and typically developing children (Experiment 1) and autistic preschoolers (Experiment 2). We evaluated how many verbs participants knew and how quickly they processed the linguistic prompt.
Participants previewed two dynamic scenes side-by-side (e.g., "stretching" and "clapping") and were then prompted to find the target verb. Children's eye gaze behaviors were operationalized using established approaches in the field with modifications in consideration for the type of stimuli (dynamic scenes versus static images) and the populations included. Accuracy was calculated as a proportion of time spent looking to the target, and linguistic processing was operationalized as latency of children's first look to the target.
In Experiment 1, there were no group differences in the proportion of verbs known, but late talkers required longer to demonstrate their knowledge than typically developing children. Latency was predicted by age but not language abilities. In Experiment 2, autistic children's accuracy and latency were both predicted by receptive language abilities.
Eye gaze can be used to assess receptive verb vocabulary in a variety of populations, but in operationalizing gaze behavior, we must account for between- and within-group differences. Bootstrapped cluster-permutation analysis is one way to create individualized measures of children's gaze behavior, but more research is warranted using an individual differences approach with this type of analysis. Finally, latency may not be a valid measure for dynamic scene stimuli for children under three years old.
通过眼动追踪技术,我们评估了说话较晚的儿童、发育正常的儿童(实验1)以及自闭症学龄前儿童(实验2)的接受性动词词汇量。我们评估了参与者认识多少动词以及他们处理语言提示的速度有多快。
参与者并排预览两个动态场景(例如,“伸展”和“鼓掌”),然后被要求找出目标动词。儿童的注视行为通过该领域既定的方法进行操作化,并根据刺激类型(动态场景与静态图像)和所纳入的人群进行了修改。准确性以看向目标的时间比例来计算,语言处理则以儿童首次看向目标的潜伏期来操作化。
在实验1中,已知动词的比例在组间没有差异,但说话较晚的儿童比发育正常的儿童需要更长时间来展示他们的知识。潜伏期由年龄预测,而非语言能力。在实验2中,自闭症儿童的准确性和潜伏期均由接受性语言能力预测。
注视行为可用于评估各类人群的接受性动词词汇量,但在操作注视行为时,我们必须考虑组间和组内差异。自展聚类置换分析是创建儿童注视行为个体化测量方法的一种方式,但使用这种分析方法的个体差异方法还需要更多研究。最后,对于三岁以下儿童,潜伏期可能不是动态场景刺激的有效测量指标。