• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化多学科团队会议:引入完善的会前准备方法及其对病例讨论时长的影响

Streamlining the Multi-Disciplinary Team Meeting: The Introduction of Robust Pre-Preparation Methods and Its Effect on the Length of Case Discussions.

作者信息

Merker Louise, Conroy Soraya, El-Wakeel Hassan, Laurence Nicola

机构信息

Department of Breast Surgery, Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK.

出版信息

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Mar 4;16:613-622. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S387174. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S387174
PMID:36910017
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9993954/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach has long been considered the optimal way in which to deliver a high standard of care to patients with breast cancer. With a growing number of patients and ever-increasing complexity of cases, the strain on time and resource of the MDT is becoming increasingly evident. It is therefore essential that local hospital departments adapt their MDT processes to better streamline discussions and optimise efficiency. The Royal United Hospital in Bath is a district general hospital in the UK. Approximately 500 patients with cancers are treated annually, and the MDT discusses approximately 60 patients per week.

METHODS

To improve our MDT meeting processes and increase productivity, we created a concise MDT template using Microsoft Access™: giving all clinicians the ability to add patients and information in real time. We also allocated weekly preparation time whereby a senior clinician ensured all patients were prepared prior to the meeting with results and potential outcomes prepopulated where possible.

RESULTS

We recorded the time spent discussing patients during 6 MDT meetings before and after implementation of changes. Cases were classified by pathology category to determine if there were differences following the preparation changes. Overall, we significantly reduced our average MDT discussion time (p=0.02). We significantly reduced average discussion time in postoperative malignant cases (p<0.0006) and expected benign core biopsy cases (p<0.0047), allowing appropriate redistribution of time towards discussion of more complex cases, reflected by the significant increase in time spent discussing complex radiology cases (p<0.025).

CONCLUSION

We offer an effective method for improving the MDT meeting preparation and presentation by ensuring each patient is appropriately prepared prior to the meeting, and outcomes for those simple cases are already prepopulated. This creates additional time within the meeting to discuss more complex clinical cases while allowing all members of the team an opportunity to discuss all patients if needed.

摘要

引言

长期以来,多学科团队(MDT)方法一直被视为为乳腺癌患者提供高标准护理的最佳方式。随着患者数量的不断增加以及病例复杂性的日益提高,MDT在时间和资源方面的压力越来越明显。因此,当地医院科室必须调整其MDT流程,以更好地简化讨论并优化效率。巴斯皇家联合医院是英国的一家地区综合医院。每年约有500名癌症患者接受治疗,MDT每周讨论约60名患者。

方法

为了改进我们的MDT会议流程并提高效率,我们使用Microsoft Access™创建了一个简洁的MDT模板:使所有临床医生能够实时添加患者和信息。我们还分配了每周的准备时间,由一名资深临床医生确保所有患者在会议前做好准备,并尽可能预先填写结果和潜在结果。

结果

我们记录了实施变更前后6次MDT会议期间讨论患者所花费的时间。病例按病理类别分类,以确定准备工作变更后是否存在差异。总体而言,我们显著缩短了平均MDT讨论时间(p=0.02)。我们显著缩短了术后恶性病例(p<0.0006)和预期良性核心活检病例(p<0.0047)的平均讨论时间,从而能够将时间适当重新分配用于讨论更复杂的病例,这体现在讨论复杂放射学病例所花费的时间显著增加(p<0.025)。

结论

我们提供了一种有效的方法来改进MDT会议的准备和展示,通过确保每个患者在会议前得到适当准备,并且简单病例的结果已经预先填写。这在会议中创造了额外的时间来讨论更复杂的临床病例,同时让团队所有成员有机会在需要时讨论所有患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27d7/9993954/fa583ce693ae/JMDH-16-613-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27d7/9993954/0c24da849882/JMDH-16-613-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27d7/9993954/f926ce8c5184/JMDH-16-613-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27d7/9993954/b0d103eeb9b4/JMDH-16-613-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27d7/9993954/fa583ce693ae/JMDH-16-613-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27d7/9993954/0c24da849882/JMDH-16-613-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27d7/9993954/f926ce8c5184/JMDH-16-613-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27d7/9993954/b0d103eeb9b4/JMDH-16-613-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27d7/9993954/fa583ce693ae/JMDH-16-613-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Streamlining the Multi-Disciplinary Team Meeting: The Introduction of Robust Pre-Preparation Methods and Its Effect on the Length of Case Discussions.优化多学科团队会议:引入完善的会前准备方法及其对病例讨论时长的影响
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Mar 4;16:613-622. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S387174. eCollection 2023.
2
Transregional Study Highlighting the Increasing Burden of Urology Cancer Multidisciplinary Team Meetings Around the UK.一项跨地区研究凸显了英国各地泌尿外科癌症多学科团队会议负担日益加重的情况。
Cureus. 2023 Nov 8;15(11):e48501. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48501. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
Refocusing cancer multidisciplinary team meetings in the United Kingdom: comparing urology with other specialties.重新聚焦英国的癌症多学科团队会议:泌尿科与其他专业的比较。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2021 Jan;103(1):10-17. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.0212. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
4
Implementation of streamlining measures in selecting and prioritising complex cases for the cancer multidisciplinary team meeting: a mini review of the recent developments.在为癌症多学科团队会议选择复杂病例并确定其优先级时实施简化措施:近期进展的简要综述
Front Health Serv. 2024 Mar 12;4:1340320. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1340320. eCollection 2024.
5
Strategies to improve the efficiency and utility of multidisciplinary team meetings in urology cancer care: a survey study.提高泌尿外科癌症护理多学科团队会议效率和效用的策略:一项调查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 8;14:377. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-377.
6
7
Improving the effectiveness of cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: analysis of a national survey of MDT members' opinions about streamlining patient discussions.提高癌症多学科团队会议的有效性:对多学科团队成员关于简化患者讨论意见的全国性调查分析
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Jun 4;8(2):e000631. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000631. eCollection 2019.
8
Educational Value of Surgical Multidisciplinary Team Meetings for Learning Non-Technical Skills - A Pilot Survey of Trainees From Two UK Deaneries.外科多学科团队会议对于学习非技术技能的教育价值——来自两个英国教务长区学员的试点调查。
J Surg Educ. 2019 Jul-Aug;76(4):1034-1047. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
9
Investigating the efficiency of lung multi-disciplinary team meetings-A mixed methods study of eight lung multi-disciplinary teams.调查肺多学科团队会议的效率-对 8 个肺多学科团队的混合方法研究。
Cancer Med. 2023 Apr;12(8):9999-10007. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5730. Epub 2023 Mar 19.
10
Impact of the lung oncology multidisciplinary team meetings on the management of patients with cancer.肺癌多学科团队会议对癌症患者管理的影响。
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun;12(2):e298-304. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12192. Epub 2014 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of streamlining measures in selecting and prioritising complex cases for the cancer multidisciplinary team meeting: a mini review of the recent developments.在为癌症多学科团队会议选择复杂病例并确定其优先级时实施简化措施:近期进展的简要综述
Front Health Serv. 2024 Mar 12;4:1340320. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1340320. eCollection 2024.
2
Cloud platform to improve efficiency and coverage of asynchronous multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with digestive tract cancer.云平台提高消化道癌患者异步多学科团队会议的效率和覆盖范围。
Front Oncol. 2024 Jan 15;13:1301781. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1301781. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
A measure of case complexity for streamlining workflow in multidisciplinary tumor boards: Mixed methods development and early validation of the MeDiC tool.一种用于简化多学科肿瘤委员会工作流程的病例复杂性衡量标准:MeDiC 工具的混合方法开发和早期验证。
Cancer Med. 2020 Jul;9(14):5143-5154. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3026. Epub 2020 May 31.
2
Improving the effectiveness of cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: analysis of a national survey of MDT members' opinions about streamlining patient discussions.提高癌症多学科团队会议的有效性:对多学科团队成员关于简化患者讨论意见的全国性调查分析
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Jun 4;8(2):e000631. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000631. eCollection 2019.
3
Do multidisciplinary cancer care teams suffer decision-making fatigue: an observational, longitudinal team improvement study.
多学科癌症护理团队是否会遭受决策疲劳:一项观察性、纵向的团队改进研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 27;9(5):e027303. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027303.
4
Successful strategies in implementing a multidisciplinary team working in the care of patients with cancer: an overview and synthesis of the available literature.实施多学科团队护理癌症患者的成功策略:现有文献综述与综合分析
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018 Jan 19;11:49-61. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S117945. eCollection 2018.
5
A study of the decision outcomes and financial costs of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDMs) in oncology.多学科团队会议(MDMs)在肿瘤学中的决策结果和财务成本研究。
Br J Cancer. 2013 Oct 29;109(9):2295-300. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.586. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
6
Improving decision making in multidisciplinary tumor boards: prospective longitudinal evaluation of a multicomponent intervention for 1,421 patients.提高多学科肿瘤委员会的决策制定能力:对 1421 例患者进行多组分干预的前瞻性纵向评估。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Sep;217(3):412-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.04.035. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
7
Role of the multidisciplinary team in breast cancer management: results from a large international survey involving 39 countries.多学科团队在乳腺癌管理中的作用:一项涉及 39 个国家的大型国际调查结果。
Ann Oncol. 2012 Apr;23(4):853-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr352. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
8
Decision making in surgical oncology.外科肿瘤学决策。
Surg Oncol. 2011 Sep;20(3):163-8. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2010.07.007. Epub 2010 Aug 16.