Lee Jin, Lee Jeong Eon, Ryu Jai Min, Kim Seok Won, Nam Seok Jin, Yu Jong Han
Division of Breast, Department of General Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2023 Mar;104(3):137-143. doi: 10.4174/astr.2023.104.3.137. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
The use of absorbable skin staplers (ASS) for skin closure has been increasing due to their convenience and time-saving effect. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of ASS in reducing skin closure time and its safety regarding surgical site infection (SSI), comparing it to conventional hand sewing (HS) in patients who underwent mastectomy.
A single-center, retrospective study was conducted. The electronic medical records of patients who underwent mastectomy between July 2015 and June 2020 in Samsung Medical Center were reviewed. The data included previously known risk factors for SSI. We compared the time expended on skin closure and the occurrence rate of SSI between the ASS group and the HS group.
We included 4,311 patients in the analysis. Among them, 520 patients were treated with ASS and 3,791 patients with HS. The average time for skin closure was 16.2 ± 10.1 minutes in the ASS group and 36.5 ± 29.0 minutes in the HS group (P < 0.001). The SSI rate was 0.38% (2 of 520) in the ASS group and 0.36% (14 of 3,791) in the HS group (P > 0.999).
The use of ASS in mastectomy reduced the time for skin closure significantly but did not increase the SSI. Therefore, it can be an effective and safe choice to use ASS instead of HS for skin closure in mastectomy.
由于可吸收皮肤缝合器(ASS)使用方便且节省时间,其在皮肤缝合中的应用日益增多。在本研究中,我们评估了ASS在减少乳房切除患者皮肤缝合时间方面的有效性及其关于手术部位感染(SSI)的安全性,并与传统手工缝合(HS)进行比较。
进行了一项单中心回顾性研究。回顾了2015年7月至2020年6月在三星医疗中心接受乳房切除术患者的电子病历。数据包括先前已知的SSI风险因素。我们比较了ASS组和HS组在皮肤缝合上花费的时间以及SSI的发生率。
我们纳入了4311例患者进行分析。其中,520例患者接受了ASS治疗,3791例患者接受了HS治疗。ASS组皮肤缝合的平均时间为16.2±10.1分钟,HS组为36.5±29.0分钟(P<0.001)。ASS组的SSI发生率为0.38%(520例中有2例),HS组为0.36%(3791例中有14例)(P>0.999)。
在乳房切除术中使用ASS可显著减少皮肤缝合时间,但不会增加SSI。因此,在乳房切除术中使用ASS而非HS进行皮肤缝合可能是一种有效且安全的选择。