Sergesketter Amanda R, Shammas Ronnie L, Massa Lisa A, Phillips Brett T, Marcus Jeffrey R
Division of Plastic, Oral, and Maxillofacial Surgery, Duke University, Durham, N.C.
Duke Department of Physical & Occupational Therapy, Durham, N.C.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Mar 10;11(3):e4869. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004869. eCollection 2023 Mar.
We describe a new approach for facial reanimation after skull base tumor resection with known facial nerve sacrifice, involving simultaneous masseter nerve transfer with selective cross facial nerve grafting (CFNG) within days after tumor surgery. This preliminary study compared outcomes of this approach versus a staged procedure involving a masseter nerve "babysitter" performed in a delayed timeline.
Patients undergoing masseter nerve transfer and CFNG for facial paralysis after skull base tumor resection were consented to participate in video interviews. Facial Clinimetric Evaluation (FaCE) Scale (0-100) patient-reported outcome, eFACE, and Facial Grading Scale scores were compared.
Nine patients had unilateral facial paralysis from resection of a schwannoma (56%), acoustic neuroma (33%), or vascular malformation (11%). Five underwent early simultaneous CFNG and masseter nerve transfer (mean 3.6 days after resection), whereas four underwent two-stage reanimation including a babysitter procedure (mean 218 days after resection). Postoperative FaCE scale and Facial Grading Scale scores were similar in both groups ( > 0.05). Postoperative mean eFACE scores were similar for both groups for smile (early: 71.5 versus delayed: 75.5; = 0.08), static (76.3 versus 82.1; = 0.32), and dynamic scores (59.7 versus 64.9; = 0.19); however, synkinesis scores were inferior in the early group (76.4 versus 91.1; = 0.04).
Early simultaneous masseter nerve transfer and CFNG provides reanimated movement sooner and in fewer stages than a staged approach in a delayed timeline. The early technique appears to result in similar clinician- and patient-reported outcomes compared with delayed procedures; however, in this preliminary study, the early approach was associated with greater synkinesis, meriting further investigation.
我们描述了一种在已知面神经牺牲的颅底肿瘤切除术后进行面部重建的新方法,即在肿瘤手术后数天内同时进行咬肌神经转移与选择性跨面神经移植(CFNG)。这项初步研究比较了该方法与在延迟时间进行的涉及咬肌神经“保姆”的分期手术的结果。
同意参与视频访谈的患者在颅底肿瘤切除术后接受咬肌神经转移和CFNG治疗面瘫。比较面部临床测量评估(FaCE)量表(0 - 100)患者报告的结果、eFACE和面部分级量表评分。
9例患者因切除神经鞘瘤(56%)、听神经瘤(33%)或血管畸形(11%)导致单侧面瘫。5例患者早期同时进行CFNG和咬肌神经转移(切除术后平均3.6天),而4例患者接受两阶段重建,包括保姆手术(切除术后平均218天)。两组术后FaCE量表和面部分级量表评分相似(>0.05)。两组术后微笑(早期:71.5对延迟:75.5;P = 0.08)、静态(76.3对82.1;P = 0.32)和动态评分(59.7对64.9;P = 0.19)的平均eFACE评分相似;然而,早期组的联带运动评分较低(76.4对91.1;P = 0.04)。
与延迟时间的分期方法相比,早期同时进行咬肌神经转移和CFNG能更快且分阶段更少地实现面部重建运动。与延迟手术相比,早期技术似乎能产生相似的临床医生和患者报告结果;然而,在这项初步研究中,早期方法与更严重的联带运动相关,值得进一步研究。