Suppr超能文献

高血压性脑出血:在激光导航和3D导航模具之间我们应该选择哪一种?

Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage: Which one should we choose between laser navigation and 3D navigation mold?

作者信息

Yuan Zhengbo, Wang Qingbo, Sun Qikai, Li Chenglong, Xiong Fengzhen, Li Zefu

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Binzhou Medical University Hospital, Binzhou, China.

Department of Neurosurgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2023 Feb 24;10:1040469. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1040469. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH) is a severe life-threatening disease, and its incidence has gradually increased in recent years. Due to the particularity and diversity of its bleeding sites, the early treatment of hematoma needs to be more meticulous and accurate, and minimally invasive surgery is often one of the measures that are commonly adopted now. The lower hematoma debridement and the navigation template created by 3D printing technology were compared in the external drainage of a hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage. Then the effect and feasibility of the two operations were explicitly evaluated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all eligible patients with HICH who underwent laser-guided hematoma evacuation or hematoma puncture under 3D-navigated molds at the Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University from January 2019 to January 2021. A total of 43 patients were treated. Twenty-three patients were treated with laser navigation-guided hematoma evacuation (group A); 20 patients were treated with 3D navigation minimally invasive surgery (group B). A comparative study was conducted between the two groups to evaluate the preoperative and postoperative conditions.

RESULTS

The preoperative preparation time of the laser navigation group was significantly shorter than that of the 3D printing group. The operation time of the 3D printing group was better than that of the laser navigation group (0.73 ± 0.26 h vs. 1.03 ± 0.27 h  = 0.00070). In the improvement in the short-term postoperatively, there was no statistically significant difference between the laser navigation group and the 3D printing group (Median hematoma evacuation rate  = 0.14); And in the three-month follow-up NIHESS score, there was no significant difference between the two ( = 0.82).

CONCLUSION

Laser-guided hematoma removal is more suitable for emergency operations, with real-time navigation and shortened preoperative preparation time; hematoma puncture under a 3D navigation mold is more personalized and shortens the intraoperative time course. There was no significant difference in therapeutic effect between the two groups.

摘要

背景

高血压性脑出血(HICH)是一种严重威胁生命的疾病,近年来其发病率逐渐上升。由于其出血部位的特殊性和多样性,血肿的早期治疗需要更加细致和精确,微创手术通常是目前常用的措施之一。比较了高血压脑出血外引流术中低位血肿清除术与3D打印技术制作的导航模板。然后明确评估了两种手术的效果和可行性。

材料与方法

对2019年1月至2021年1月在滨州医学院附属医院接受激光引导血肿清除术或3D导航模具下血肿穿刺术的所有符合条件的HICH患者进行回顾性分析。共治疗43例患者。23例患者接受激光导航引导血肿清除术(A组);20例患者接受3D导航微创手术(B组)。对两组进行对比研究,评估术前和术后情况。

结果

激光导航组的术前准备时间明显短于3D打印组。3D打印组的手术时间优于激光导航组(0.73±0.26小时对1.03±0.27小时,P = 0.00070)。术后短期内的改善情况,激光导航组与3D打印组之间无统计学显著差异(血肿清除率中位数 = 0.14);在三个月随访的美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分中,两组之间无显著差异(P = 0.82)。

结论

激光引导血肿清除术更适合急诊手术,具有实时导航且缩短术前准备时间;3D导航模具下血肿穿刺术更具个性化且缩短术中时间进程。两组治疗效果无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d1f/10001900/2a911e53fd1d/fsurg-10-1040469-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验