Bhuiya Tanzim, Roman Sherif, Aydin Taner, Patel Bhakti, Zeltser Roman, Makaryus Amgad N
Department of Cardiology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY 11553, United States.
Department of Cardiology, St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ 07503, United States.
World J Cardiol. 2023 Feb 26;15(2):56-63. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v15.i2.56.
Inpatient telemetry heart rhythm monitoring overuse has been linked to higher healthcare costs.
To evaluate if CHADS-VASc score could be used to indicate if a patient admitted with possible cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) requires inpatient telemetry monitoring.
A total of 257 patients presenting with CVA or TIA and placed on telemetry monitoring were analyzed retrospectively. We investigated the utility of telemetry monitoring to diagnose atrial fibrillation/flutter and the CHADS-VASc scoring tool to stratify the risk of having CVA/TIA in these patients.
In our study population, 63 (24.5%) of the patients with CVA/TIA and telemetry monitoring were determined to have no ischemic neurologic event. Of the 194 (75.5) patients that had a confirmed CVA/TIA, only 6 (2.3%) had an arrhythmia detected during their inpatient telemetry monitoring period. Individuals with a confirmed CVA/TIA had a statistically significant higher CHADS-VASc score compared to individuals without an ischemic event (3.59 2.61, < 0.001).
Given the low percentage of inpatient arrhythmias identified, further research should focus on discretionary use of inpatient telemetry on higher risk patients to diagnose the arrhythmias commonly leading to CVA/TIA. A prospective study assessing event rate of CVA/TIA in patients with higher CHADS-VASc score should be performed to validate the CHADS-VASc score as a possible risk stratifying tool for patients at risk for CVA/TIA.
住院患者遥测心律监测的过度使用与更高的医疗成本相关。
评估CHADS-VASc评分是否可用于指示因可能的脑血管意外(CVA)或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)入院的患者是否需要住院遥测监测。
对257例出现CVA或TIA并接受遥测监测的患者进行回顾性分析。我们研究了遥测监测对诊断心房颤动/扑动的效用以及CHADS-VASc评分工具对这些患者发生CVA/TIA风险进行分层的情况。
在我们的研究人群中,63例(24.5%)接受CVA/TIA和遥测监测的患者被确定没有缺血性神经事件。在194例(75.5%)确诊为CVA/TIA的患者中,只有6例(2.3%)在住院遥测监测期间检测到心律失常。与没有缺血事件的个体相比,确诊为CVA/TIA的个体CHADS-VASc评分在统计学上显著更高(3.59±2.61,P<0.001)。
鉴于所识别的住院心律失常比例较低,进一步的研究应侧重于对高危患者酌情使用住院遥测来诊断通常导致CVA/TIA的心律失常。应进行一项前瞻性研究,评估CHADS-VASc评分较高的患者中CVA/TIA的事件发生率,以验证CHADS-VASc评分作为CVA/TIA高危患者可能的风险分层工具的有效性。