Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.
J Athl Train. 2023 Nov 1;58(11-12):912-919. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0452.22.
Participants with chronic ankle instability (CAI) frequently display altered movement patterns during functional movements. However, it remains unclear how these altered joint kinematics during jump landing negatively affect ankle joint health in the CAI population. Calculating joint energetics may offer an important method to estimate the magnitude of lower extremity joint loading during functional movements in participants with CAI.
To determine differences in energy dissipation and generation by the lower extremity during maximal jump landing and cutting among groups with CAI, copers, and controls.
Cross-sectional study.
Laboratory.
Forty-four participants with CAI, 44 copers, and 44 controls.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES(S): Kinematics and kinetics of the lower extremity and ground reaction force data were collected during a maximal jump-landing and cutting task. The product of angular velocity in the sagittal plane and joint moment data represented joint power. Energy dissipation and generation by the ankle, knee, and hip joints were calculated by integrating regions of the joint power curve.
Participants with CAI displayed reduced ankle energy dissipation (35.9% ± 10.1%) and generation (31.6% ± 12.8%; P < .01) compared with copers (dissipation = 43.6% ± 11.1%; generation = 40.4% ± 12.0%) and controls (dissipation = 41.3% ± 11.1%; generation = 39.6% ± 12.0%) during maximal jump landing and cutting. Participants with CAI also displayed greater energy dissipation at the knee (45.1% ± 9.1%) than copers (39.7% ± 9.5%) during the loading phase and greater energy generation at the hip than controls (36.6% ± 16.8% versus 28.3% ± 12.8%) during the cutting phase. However, copers displayed no differences in joint energetics compared with controls.
Participants with CAI displayed differences in both energy dissipation and generation by the lower extremity during maximal jump landing and cutting. However, copers did not show altered joint energetics, which may represent a coping mechanism to avoid further injuries.
慢性踝关节不稳定(CAI)患者在进行功能性运动时常表现出运动模式改变。然而,目前尚不清楚这些在跳跃着陆期间的关节运动学改变如何对 CAI 人群的踝关节健康产生负面影响。计算关节能量可能是一种重要的方法,可以估计 CAI 患者在进行功能性运动时下肢关节的受力大小。
确定 CAI、代偿者和对照组在最大跳跃着陆和切割过程中下肢的能量耗散和产生的差异。
横断面研究。
实验室。
44 名 CAI 患者、44 名代偿者和 44 名对照组。
下肢运动学和动力学以及地面反作用力数据在最大跳跃着陆和切割任务中收集。矢状面角速度和关节力矩数据的乘积代表关节功率。通过整合关节功率曲线的区域来计算踝关节、膝关节和髋关节的能量耗散和产生。
与代偿者(耗散=43.6%±11.1%;产生=40.4%±12.0%)和对照组(耗散=41.3%±11.1%;产生=39.6%±12.0%)相比,CAI 患者在最大跳跃着陆和切割过程中,踝关节的能量耗散(35.9%±10.1%)和产生(31.6%±12.8%)均减少(P<.01)。CAI 患者在负荷阶段膝关节的能量耗散(45.1%±9.1%)大于代偿者(39.7%±9.5%),在切割阶段髋关节的能量产生大于对照组(36.6%±16.8%比 28.3%±12.8%)。然而,与对照组相比,代偿者的关节能量学没有差异。
CAI 患者在最大跳跃着陆和切割过程中,下肢的能量耗散和产生均存在差异。然而,代偿者并没有表现出关节能量学的改变,这可能代表了一种避免进一步受伤的应对机制。