• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估厕所和儿童粪便管理干预措施的持续采用情况:干预启动后 1-3.5 年对孟加拉国农村地区进行的一项集群随机对照试验的扩展随访。

Assessing sustained uptake of latrine and child feces management interventions: Extended follow-up of a cluster-randomized controlled trial in rural Bangladesh 1-3.5 years after intervention initiation.

机构信息

Environmental Intervention Unit, Infectious Disease Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Environmental Intervention Unit, Infectious Disease Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

出版信息

Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2023 May;250:114149. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2023.114149. Epub 2023 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijheh.2023.114149
PMID:36913791
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10186382/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sanitation interventions typically result in modest increases in latrine access, and any gains in latrine access and use are often not sustained over time. Sanitation programs also rarely include child-focused interventions such as potties. We aimed to assess the sustained effect of a multi-component sanitation intervention on access to and use of latrines and child feces management tools in rural Bangladesh.

METHODS

We conducted a longitudinal substudy nested within the WASH Benefits randomized controlled trial. The trial provided latrine upgrades, child potties and sani-scoops for feces removal, along with behavior change promotion to encourage use of the delivered hardware. Promotion visits to intervention recipients were frequent during the first 2 years after intervention initiation, decreased in frequency between years 2-3, and ceased after 3 years. We enrolled a random subset of 720 households from the sanitation and control arms of the trial in a substudy and visited them quarterly between 1 and 3.5 years after intervention initiation. At each visit, field staff recorded sanitation-related behaviors through spot-check observations and structured questionnaires. We assessed intervention effects on observed indicators of hygienic latrine access, potty use and sani-scoop use and investigated whether these effects were modified by duration of follow-up, ongoing behavior change promotion and household characteristics.

RESULTS

The intervention increased hygienic latrine access from 37% among controls to 94% in the sanitation arm (p < 0.001). Access among intervention recipients remained high 3.5 years after intervention initiation, including periods with no active promotion. Gains in access were higher among households with less education, less wealth and larger number of residents. The intervention increased availability of child potties from 29% among controls to 98% in the sanitation arm (p < 0.001). However, fewer than 25% of intervention households reported exclusive child defecation in a potty or had observed indicators of potty and sani-scoop use, and gains in potty use declined over the follow-up period, even with ongoing promotion.

CONCLUSION

Our findings from an intervention that provided free products and intensive initial behavior change promotion suggest a sustained increase in hygienic latrine access up to 3.5 years after intervention initiation but infrequent use of child feces management tools. Studies should investigate strategies to ensure sustained adoption of safe child feces management practices.

摘要

背景

卫生设施干预措施通常会使厕所的使用量适度增加,但厕所得益于这些措施的任何增加往往都不能长期持续。卫生设施计划通常也很少包括以儿童为重点的干预措施,例如便盆。我们旨在评估一项多组成分卫生干预措施对孟加拉国农村地区厕所使用和儿童粪便管理工具的获取和使用的持续效果。

方法

我们在 WASH Benefits 随机对照试验中进行了一项纵向子研究。该试验提供了厕所升级、儿童便盆和粪便清除用的卫生铲,同时还开展了行为改变促进活动,以鼓励使用提供的硬件。在干预启动后的头 2 年内,对干预接受者的推广访问很频繁,在 2-3 年之间的频率降低,在 3 年后停止。我们从试验的卫生和对照组中随机抽取了 720 户家庭作为子研究的一部分,并在干预启动后 1 至 3.5 年内每季度进行一次访问。在每次访问中,实地工作人员通过抽查观察和结构化问卷记录与卫生相关的行为。我们评估了干预对卫生厕所获取、便盆使用和卫生铲使用等观察指标的影响,并研究了这些影响是否因随访时间、持续的行为改变促进和家庭特征而有所改变。

结果

该干预措施将对照组中卫生厕所的获取率从 37%提高到了卫生组的 94%(p<0.001)。在干预启动后 3.5 年内,干预接受者的获取率仍然很高,包括在没有积极推广的时期。受教育程度较低、财富较少和居民人数较多的家庭的获取率增加幅度更大。该干预措施将对照组中儿童便盆的可获得率从 29%提高到了卫生组的 98%(p<0.001)。然而,不到 25%的干预家庭报告说儿童只在便盆中排便,或者观察到了便盆和卫生铲的使用迹象,而且随着随访时间的延长,便盆的使用率下降了,即使有持续的推广。

结论

我们从一项提供免费产品和强化初始行为改变促进措施的干预措施中发现,在干预启动后 3.5 年内,卫生厕所的获取率持续增加,但儿童粪便管理工具的使用频率较低。研究应探讨确保安全儿童粪便管理措施持续采用的策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39cd/10186382/6fb473ad59f7/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39cd/10186382/72155e14c84f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39cd/10186382/d1fe1a8fa5fb/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39cd/10186382/6fb473ad59f7/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39cd/10186382/72155e14c84f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39cd/10186382/d1fe1a8fa5fb/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39cd/10186382/6fb473ad59f7/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing sustained uptake of latrine and child feces management interventions: Extended follow-up of a cluster-randomized controlled trial in rural Bangladesh 1-3.5 years after intervention initiation.评估厕所和儿童粪便管理干预措施的持续采用情况:干预启动后 1-3.5 年对孟加拉国农村地区进行的一项集群随机对照试验的扩展随访。
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2023 May;250:114149. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2023.114149. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
2
Evaluation of an on-site sanitation intervention against childhood diarrhea and acute respiratory infection 1 to 3.5 years after implementation: Extended follow-up of a cluster-randomized controlled trial in rural Bangladesh.现场卫生干预措施对儿童腹泻和急性呼吸道感染的效果评价:孟加拉国农村地区一项集群随机对照试验的延长随访。
PLoS Med. 2022 Aug 8;19(8):e1004041. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004041. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
Improved Child Feces Management Mediates Reductions in Childhood Diarrhea from an On-Site Sanitation Intervention: Causal Mediation Analysis of a Cluster-Randomized Trial in Rural Bangladesh.现场环境卫生干预降低儿童腹泻率的中介因素分析:孟加拉国农村地区一项整群随机试验的因果中介分析
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2024 Sep;14(3):765-778. doi: 10.1007/s44197-024-00210-y. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
4
WASH Benefits Bangladesh trial: system for monitoring coverage and quality in an efficacy trial.“水、环境卫生与个人卫生促进”对孟加拉国的试验:一项疗效试验中的覆盖范围和质量监测系统
Trials. 2018 Jul 6;19(1):360. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2708-2.
5
Achieving equitable uptake of handwashing and sanitation by addressing both supply and demand-based constraints: findings from a randomized controlled trial in rural Bangladesh.通过解决供需两方面的制约因素实现手卫生和环境卫生的公平普及:孟加拉国农村地区一项随机对照试验的结果。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Jan 6;20(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01353-7.
6
Achieving optimal technology and behavioral uptake of single and combined interventions of water, sanitation hygiene and nutrition, in an efficacy trial (WASH benefits) in rural Bangladesh.在孟加拉国农村进行的一项效果试验(水、环境卫生与个人卫生促进项目)中,实现水、环境卫生、个人卫生和营养单一及联合干预措施的最佳技术应用和行为改变。
Trials. 2018 Jul 6;19(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2710-8.
7
Longitudinal Effects of a Sanitation Intervention on Environmental Fecal Contamination in a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial in Rural Bangladesh.在孟加拉国农村进行的一项整群随机对照试验中,卫生干预措施对环境粪便污染的纵向影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 Jun 15;55(12):8169-8179. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c01114. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
8
Study design and rationale for a cluster randomized trial of a safe child feces management intervention in rural Odisha, India.研究设计与印度奥里萨邦农村安全儿童粪便管理干预的集群随机试验的基本原理。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 15;22(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12405-0.
9
Assessment of the Acceptability and Feasibility of Child Potties for Safe Child Feces Disposal in Rural Bangladesh.孟加拉国农村地区用于安全处理儿童粪便的儿童便盆的可接受性和可行性评估。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Aug;97(2):469-476. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0932. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
10
Effect of sanitation improvements on soil-transmitted helminth eggs in courtyard soil from rural Bangladesh: Evidence from a cluster-randomized controlled trial.改善环境卫生对孟加拉国农村庭院土壤中土壤传播性蠕虫卵的影响:一项基于群组随机对照试验的证据。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Jul 28;15(7):e0008815. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008815. eCollection 2021 Jul.

引用本文的文献

1
Improved Child Feces Management Mediates Reductions in Childhood Diarrhea from an On-Site Sanitation Intervention: Causal Mediation Analysis of a Cluster-Randomized Trial in Rural Bangladesh.现场环境卫生干预降低儿童腹泻率的中介因素分析:孟加拉国农村地区一项整群随机试验的因果中介分析
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2024 Sep;14(3):765-778. doi: 10.1007/s44197-024-00210-y. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
2
Effects of water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions on detection of enteropathogens and host-specific faecal markers in the environment: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.水质、环境卫生和个人卫生干预措施对环境中肠病原体和宿主特异性粪便标志物检测效果的系统评价和个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
Lancet Planet Health. 2023 Mar;7(3):e197-e208. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00028-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Persistent Transmission Is Possible in Urban Areas Even Where Sanitation Coverage Is High.即使在卫生设施覆盖率高的城市地区,也可能存在持续传播。
Environ Sci Technol. 2022 Nov 15;56(22):15969-15980. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c04667. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
2
Effect of a low-cost, behaviour-change intervention on latrine use and safe disposal of child faeces in rural Odisha, India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.印度奥里萨邦农村地区一项低成本行为改变干预措施对厕所使用和儿童粪便安全处置的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Lancet Planet Health. 2022 Feb;6(2):e110-e121. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00324-7.
3
Study design and rationale for a cluster randomized trial of a safe child feces management intervention in rural Odisha, India.
研究设计与印度奥里萨邦农村安全儿童粪便管理干预的集群随机试验的基本原理。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 15;22(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12405-0.
4
Longitudinal Effects of a Sanitation Intervention on Environmental Fecal Contamination in a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial in Rural Bangladesh.在孟加拉国农村进行的一项整群随机对照试验中,卫生干预措施对环境粪便污染的纵向影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 Jun 15;55(12):8169-8179. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c01114. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
5
Child defecation and feces management practices in rural Bangladesh: Associations with fecal contamination, observed hand cleanliness and child diarrhea.孟加拉国农村地区儿童排便和粪便管理行为:与粪便污染、观察到手的清洁度和儿童腹泻的关联。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 20;15(7):e0236163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236163. eCollection 2020.
6
Practices and Perspectives on Latrine Use, Child Feces Disposal, and Clean Play Environments in Western Kenya.肯尼亚西部关于厕所使用、儿童粪便处理和清洁游戏环境的做法和观点。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 May;102(5):1094-1103. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0389.
7
Impact of an intervention to improve pit latrine emptying practices in low income urban neighborhoods of Maputo, Mozambique.改善莫桑比克马普托低收入城市社区坑式厕所清空做法的干预措施的影响。
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2020 May;226:113480. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113480. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
8
Child feces management practices and fecal contamination: A cross-sectional study in rural Odisha, India.儿童粪便管理实践与粪便污染:印度奥里萨邦农村的横断面研究。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Mar 20;709:136169. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136169. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
9
The WASH Benefits and SHINE trials: interpretation of WASH intervention effects on linear growth and diarrhoea.WASH 效益和 SHINE 试验:解释 WASH 干预措施对线性生长和腹泻的影响。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Aug;7(8):e1139-e1146. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30268-2.
10
Microbial Source Tracking Using 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing Identifies Evidence of Widespread Contamination from Young Children's Feces in an Urban Slum of Nairobi, Kenya.使用 16S rRNA 扩增子测序进行微生物源追踪,在肯尼亚内罗毕的一个城市贫民窟中发现了幼儿粪便广泛污染的证据。
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Jul 16;53(14):8271-8281. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b06583. Epub 2019 Jul 3.