Intensive Care Unit, Department of Critical Care, Hospital de Clínicas (University Hospital), Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Ipanema Trust, Auckland, New Zealand.
Nutrition. 2023 May;109:112000. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2023.112000. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
Sepsis is a life-threatening condition characterized by multiorgan dysfunction due to an exaggerated host response to infection associated with a homeostatic failure. In sepsis, different interventions, aimed at improving clinical outcomes, have been tested over the past decades. Among these most recent strategies, intravenous high-dose micronutrients (vitamins and/or trace elements) have been investigated. According to current knowledge, sepsis is characterized by low thiamine levels, which are associated with illness severity, hyperlactatemia, and poor clinical outcomes. However, caution is needed about the clinical interpretation of thiamine blood concentration in critically ill patients, and the inflammatory status, based on C-reactive protein levels, should always be measured. In sepsis, parenteral thiamine has been administered as monotherapy or in combination with vitamin C and corticosteroids. Nevertheless, most of those trials failed to report clinical benefits with high-dose thiamine. The purpose of this review is to summarize the biological properties of thiamine and to examine current knowledge regarding the safety and efficacy of high-dose thiamine as pharmaconutrition strategy when administering singly or in combination with other micronutrients in critically ill adult patients with sepsis or septic shock. Our examination of the most up-to-date evidence concludes that Recommended Daily Allowance supplementation is relatively safe for thiamine-deficient patients. However, current evidence does not support pharmaconutrition with high-dose thiamine as a single therapy or as combination therapy aimed at improving clinical outcomes in critically ill septic patients. The best nutrient combination still needs to be determined, based on the antioxidant micronutrient network and the multiple interactions among different vitamins and trace elements. In addition, a better understanding of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of intravenous thiamine is needed. Future well-designed and powered clinical trials are urgently warranted before any specific recommendations can be made regarding supplementation in the critical care setting.
脓毒症是一种危及生命的病症,其特征是由于宿主对感染的过度反应导致多器官功能障碍,同时伴有体内平衡的失败。在过去的几十年中,已经测试了许多不同的干预措施,旨在改善临床结果。在这些最新的策略中,静脉内给予大剂量微量营养素(维生素和/或微量元素)已被研究。根据目前的知识,脓毒症的特点是硫胺素水平低,其与疾病严重程度、高乳酸血症和不良临床结果有关。然而,在危重病患者中,需要谨慎对待硫胺素血液浓度的临床解释,并且应始终测量基于 C 反应蛋白水平的炎症状态。在脓毒症中,已将肠外硫胺素作为单一疗法或与维生素 C 和皮质类固醇联合使用。尽管如此,大多数试验未能报告高剂量硫胺素的临床益处。本综述的目的是总结硫胺素的生物学特性,并检查目前关于高剂量硫胺素作为药物营养策略的安全性和疗效的知识,无论是单独使用还是与其他微量营养素联合使用,在患有脓毒症或脓毒性休克的成年危重病患者中。我们对最新证据的审查得出结论,对于硫胺素缺乏的患者,推荐每日允许量的补充相对安全。然而,目前的证据并不支持高剂量硫胺素作为单一疗法或联合疗法用于改善危重症脓毒症患者的临床结果。基于抗氧化微量营养素网络和不同维生素和微量元素之间的多种相互作用,仍需要确定最佳的营养组合。此外,需要更好地了解静脉内硫胺素的药代动力学和药效学特征。在任何特定的补充建议可以在重症监护环境中做出之前,迫切需要进行精心设计和有力的临床试验。