Department of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Division of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA.
Department of Gastroenterology, Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, USA; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Aug;98(2):155-161.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.03.009. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
Real-world data on the adverse events and the survival benefit of Barrett's endoscopic therapy (BET) are limited. The aim of this study was to examine the safety and effectiveness (survival benefit) of BET in patients with neoplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE).
An electronic health record-based database (TriNetX) was used to select patients with BE with dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) from 2016 to 2020. Primary outcome was 3-year mortality among patients with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or EAC who underwent BET versus 2 comparison cohorts: patients with HGD or EAC who had not undergone BET and patients with GERD but no BE/EAC. Secondary outcome was adverse events (esophageal perforation, upper GI bleeding, chest pain, and esophageal stricture) after BET. To control for confounding variables, 1:1 propensity score matching was performed.
We identified 27,556 patients with BE and dysplasia, of whom 5295 underwent BET. After propensity score matching, patients with HGD and EAC who underwent BET had significantly lower 3-year mortality (HGD risk ratio [RR], .59; 95% CI, .49-.71; EAC RR, .53; 95% CI, .44-.65) compared with corresponding cohorts who did not undergo BET (P < .001). There was no difference in median 3-year mortality between control subjects (GERD without BE/EAC) compared with patients with HGD (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, .84-1.27) who underwent BET. Finally, there was no difference in median 3-year mortality between patients who underwent BET compared with patients who underwent esophagectomy among both HGD (RR, .67; 95% CI, .39-1.14; P =.14) and EAC (RR, .73; 95% CI, .47-1.13; P = .14). Esophageal stricture was the most common adverse event (6.5%) after BET.
Real-world, population-based evidence from this large database shows that endoscopic therapy is safe and effective for patients with BE. Endoscopic therapy is associated with a significantly lower 3-year mortality; however, it leads to esophageal strictures in 6.5% of treated patients.
有关 Barrett 内镜治疗(BET)不良事件和生存获益的真实世界数据有限。本研究旨在检查 BET 在患有肿瘤性 Barrett 食管(BE)的患者中的安全性和有效性(生存获益)。
利用电子病历数据库(TriNetX),从 2016 年至 2020 年选择伴有异型增生和食管腺癌(EAC)的 BE 患者。主要结局是接受 BET 的高级别异型增生(HGD)或 EAC 患者与 2 个比较队列(未接受 BET 的 HGD 或 EAC 患者和 GERD 但无 BE/EAC 的患者)之间的 3 年死亡率。次要结局是 BET 后的不良事件(食管穿孔、上消化道出血、胸痛和食管狭窄)。为了控制混杂变量,进行了 1:1 倾向评分匹配。
我们共确定了 27556 例 BE 伴异型增生患者,其中 5295 例接受了 BET。经倾向评分匹配后,与未接受 BET 的相应队列相比,接受 BET 的 HGD 和 EAC 患者的 3 年死亡率显著降低(HGD 风险比 [RR],0.59;95%CI,0.49-0.71;EAC RR,0.53;95%CI,0.44-0.65)(P<0.001)。与接受 BET 的 HGD 患者相比,对照组(无 BE/EAC 的 GERD)的中位 3 年死亡率无差异(RR,1.04;95%CI,0.84-1.27)。最后,在 HGD 患者中(RR,0.67;95%CI,0.39-1.14;P=0.14)和 EAC 患者中(RR,0.73;95%CI,0.47-1.13;P=0.14),与接受 BET 的患者相比,接受 BET 的患者与接受食管切除术的患者的中位 3 年死亡率无差异。BET 后最常见的不良事件是食管狭窄(6.5%)。
这项来自大型数据库的真实世界、基于人群的证据表明,内镜治疗对 BE 患者是安全有效的。内镜治疗与 3 年死亡率显著降低相关;然而,它会导致 6.5%的治疗患者发生食管狭窄。