Young Matthew J, Fefferman Nina H
National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis (NIMBioS), University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis (NIMBioS), University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Math Biosci. 2023 Apr;358:108994. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2023.108994. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
The central challenge of mathematical modeling of real-world systems is to strike an appropriate balance between insightful abstraction and detailed accuracy. Models in mathematical epidemiology frequently tend to either extreme, focusing on analytically provable boundaries in simplified, mass-action approximations, or else relying on calculated numerical solutions and computational simulation experiments to capture nuance and details specific to a particular host-disease system. We propose that there is value in an approach striking a slightly different compromise in which a detailed but analytically difficult system is modeled with careful detail, but then abstraction is applied to the results of numerical solutions to that system, rather than to the biological system itself. In this 'Portfolio of Model Approximations' approach, multiple levels of approximation are used to analyze the model at different scales of complexity. While this method has the potential to introduce error in the translation from model to model, it also has the potential to produce generalizable insight for the set of all similar systems, rather than isolated, tailored results that must be started anew for each next question. In this paper, we demonstrate this process and its value with a case study from evolutionary epidemiology. We consider a modified Susceptible-Infected-Recovered model for a vector-borne pathogen affecting two annually reproducing hosts. From observing patterns in simulations of the system and exploiting basic epidemiological properties, we construct two approximations of the model at different levels of complexity that can be treated as hypotheses about the behavior of the model. We compare the predictions of the approximations to the simulated results and discuss the trade-offs between accuracy and abstraction. We discuss the implications for this particular model, and in the context of mathematical biology in general.
对现实世界系统进行数学建模的核心挑战在于,要在深刻的抽象性与详细的准确性之间找到恰当的平衡。数学流行病学中的模型常常倾向于走向两个极端,要么聚焦于简化的群体作用近似法中可通过分析证明的边界,要么依靠计算得到的数值解和计算模拟实验来捕捉特定宿主 - 疾病系统的细微差别和细节。我们提出,有一种方法能达成稍有不同的折中,具有一定价值。即对一个详细但分析起来困难的系统进行细致建模,然后将抽象应用于该系统数值解的结果,而非应用于生物系统本身。在这种“模型近似组合”方法中,使用多个近似层次在不同的复杂程度尺度上分析模型。虽然这种方法有可能在模型间转换时引入误差,但它也有可能为所有相似系统生成可推广的见解,而非针对每个后续问题都必须重新开始得出的孤立、定制化结果。在本文中,我们通过进化流行病学的一个案例研究来展示这一过程及其价值。我们考虑一个针对影响两种一年生宿主的媒介传播病原体的修正易感 - 感染 - 恢复模型。通过观察系统模拟中的模式并利用基本的流行病学特性,我们构建了该模型在不同复杂程度层次上的两种近似,可将其视为关于模型行为的假设。我们将近似的预测结果与模拟结果进行比较,并讨论准确性与抽象性之间的权衡。我们讨论了这一特定模型的意义,以及在一般数学生物学背景下的意义。