Yan Michael, Lee Minha, Myrehaug Sten, Tseng Chia-Lin, Detsky Jay, Chen Hanbo, Das Sunit, Yeboah Collins, Lipsman Nir, Costa Leodante Da, Holden Lori, Heyn Chinthaka, Maralani Pejman, Ruschin Mark, Sahgal Arjun, Soliman Hany
Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Division of Neurosurgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
J Neurooncol. 2023 Mar;162(1):119-128. doi: 10.1007/s11060-023-04265-y. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
Various treatment options exist to salvage stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) failures for brain metastases, including repeat SRS and hypofractionated SRS (HSRS). Our objective was to report outcomes specific to salvage HSRS for brain metastases that failed prior HSRS/SRS.
Patients treated with HSRS to salvage local failures (LF) following initial HSRS/SRS, between July 2010 and April 2020, were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcomes were the rates of LF, radiation necrosis (RN), and symptomatic radiation necrosis (SRN). Univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) analyses using competing risk regression were performed to identify predictive factors for each endpoint.
120 Metastases in 91 patients were identified. The median clinical follow up was 13.4 months (range 1.1-111.1), and the median interval between SRS courses was 13.1 months (range 3.0-56.5). 115 metastases were salvaged with 20-35 Gy in 5 fractions and the remaining five with a total dose ranging from 20 to 24 Gy in 3-fractions. 67 targets (56%) were postoperative cavities. The median re-treatment target volume and biological effective dose (BED) was 9.5 cc and 37.5 Gy, respectively. The 6- and 12- month LF rates were 18.9% and 27.7%, for RN 13% and 15.6%, and for SRN were 6.1% and 7.0%, respectively. MVA identified larger re-irradiation volume (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, p = 0.04) and shorter interval between radiosurgery courses (HR 0.93, p < 0.001) as predictors of LF. Treatment of an intact target was associated with a higher risk of RN (HR 2.29, p = 0.04).
Salvage HSRS results in high local control rates and toxicity rates that compare favorably to those single fraction SRS re-irradiation experiences reported in the literature.
存在多种治疗方案来挽救立体定向放射外科(SRS)治疗脑转移瘤失败的情况,包括重复SRS和大分割SRS(HSRS)。我们的目的是报告挽救性HSRS治疗先前HSRS/SRS治疗失败的脑转移瘤的具体结果。
对2010年7月至2020年4月期间接受HSRS治疗以挽救初次HSRS/SRS后局部失败(LF)的患者进行回顾性研究。主要结局是LF、放射性坏死(RN)和症状性放射性坏死(SRN)的发生率。采用竞争风险回归进行单变量(UVA)和多变量(MVA)分析,以确定每个终点的预测因素。
共纳入91例患者的120个转移灶。临床随访的中位时间为13.4个月(范围1.1 - 111.1个月),两次SRS疗程之间的中位间隔为13.1个月(范围3.0 - 56.5个月)。115个转移灶采用5次分割给予20 - 35 Gy,其余5个转移灶采用3次分割给予总量20至24 Gy。67个靶区(56%)为术后残腔。再次治疗的中位靶体积和生物等效剂量(BED)分别为9.5 cc和37.5 Gy。6个月和12个月时的LF发生率分别为18.9%和27.7%,RN发生率分别为13%和15.6%,SRN发生率分别为6.1%和7.0%。MVA分析确定再次照射体积较大(风险比[HR] 1.02,p = 0.04)和两次放射外科疗程之间的间隔较短(HR 0.93,p < 0.001)是LF的预测因素。完整靶区的治疗与较高的RN风险相关(HR 2.29,p = 0.04)。
挽救性HSRS导致较高的局部控制率和毒性率,与文献报道的单次分割SRS再照射经验相比具有优势。