Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜全结肠切除回肠直肠吻合术和逆蠕动盲结直肠吻合术治疗慢传输型便秘。

Laparoscopic total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis and subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic cecorectal anastomosis for slow transit constipation.

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 1 Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.

出版信息

Updates Surg. 2023 Jun;75(4):871-880. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01458-y. Epub 2023 Mar 14.

Abstract

To investigate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (TC-IRA) and laparoscopic subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic cecorectal anastomosis (SC-ACRA) on adults with slow transit constipation (STC). One hundred and three patients with STC were assigned to the TC-IRA group (n = 53) and the SC-ACRA group (n = 50). The clinical data were analyzed. The surgery was successful in all patients (100%). Significantly (P = 0.03) more patients took anti-laxatives during hospitalization in the TC-IRA than the SC-ACRA group (39.62% vs. 20.00%). Abdominal pain and distension was present in 33.96% and 32.00% patients in the TC-IRA and SC-ACRA group, respectively, which decreased insignificantly (P > 0.05) to 18.87% and 18.00% 24 months after surgery, respectively. The postoperative Wexner and gastrointestinal quality of life (GIQLI) scores were not significantly different (P > 0.05) at all times after surgery in both groups. The defecation frequency decreased in both groups, and the average defecation frequency was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in the TC-IRA than the SC-ACRA group (3.91 ± 1.23 vs. 3.14 ± 1.15 times/day) at 3 months. Three months after surgery, significantly (P < 0.05) fewer patients were satisfied with defecation frequency in the TC-IRA than the SC-ACRA group (29 vs. 37 patients), whereas the number of patients who were willing to choose the same procedure again was not significantly (P > 0.05) different between the two groups. The WIS score of patients was significantly (P = 0.035) higher in the TC-IRA than the SC-ACRA group (6 vs. 5) 3 months later. TC-IRA and SC-ACRA are both safe and effective for adult slow transit constipation, and can significantly improve the quality of life of patients. Even though SC-ACRA has better early defecation frequency, postoperative antidiarrheal application and satisfaction, the long-term follow-up effects are similar.

摘要

目的

探讨腹腔镜全结肠切除回直肠吻合术(TC-IRA)与腹腔镜结肠次全切除逆蠕动盲直肠吻合术(SC-ACRA)治疗成人慢传输型便秘(STC)的临床疗效。

方法

选择 2017 年 6 月至 2019 年 6 月首都医科大学附属北京世纪坛医院收治的 103 例 STC 患者,根据手术方式不同分为 TC-IRA 组(n=53)和 SC-ACRA 组(n=50)。比较两组患者的一般资料、手术情况、术后并发症、胃肠功能恢复情况、Wexner 便秘评分、胃肠道生活质量评分(GIQLI)、WIS 评分及术后随访情况。

结果

两组患者均顺利完成手术(100%)。TC-IRA 组患者住院期间使用通便药物的比例明显高于 SC-ACRA 组[39.62%(21/53)比 20.00%(10/50)],差异有统计学意义(P=0.03)。TC-IRA 组和 SC-ACRA 组患者术后分别有 33.96%(18/53)和 32.00%(16/50)发生腹痛腹胀,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后 24 个月时,两组患者的腹痛腹胀发生率分别降至 18.87%(10/53)和 18.00%(9/50),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者术后 Wexner 评分和 GIQLI 评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后两组患者排便次数均减少,且 TC-IRA 组患者排便次数明显多于 SC-ACRA 组[(3.91±1.23)次/d 比(3.14±1.15)次/d],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后 3 个月时,TC-IRA 组患者对排便频率的满意度明显低于 SC-ACRA 组[29.0%(15/53)比 37.0%(19/50)],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);但愿意再次选择相同术式的患者比例差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后 3 个月时,TC-IRA 组患者的 WIS 评分明显高于 SC-ACRA 组[6(4,8)分比 5(3,6)分],差异有统计学意义(P=0.035)。

结论

TC-IRA 和 SC-ACRA 治疗成人 STC 均安全有效,均可明显改善患者的生活质量,虽然 SC-ACRA 术后早期排便频率、通便药物应用及患者满意度较好,但长期随访效果相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验