• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妊娠创伤:倾向评分匹配分析。

Traumatic Injury in Pregnancy: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

机构信息

Tulane University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, New Orleans, Louisiana.

Tulane University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, New Orleans, Louisiana.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2023 Mar;283:1018-1025. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.10.087. Epub 2022 Dec 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2022.10.087
PMID:36914991
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Trauma represents the leading cause of nonobstetrical maternal death. How in-hospital outcomes of acutely injured pregnant patients (PP) compares to that of similarly aged nonpregnant control groups (CGs) has not been described. We hypothesized that PPs suffering acute traumatic injuries would have worse outcomes compared to a matched CG.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) was used to identify traumatically injured females between 2017 and 2019. Propensity score matching on age, race, injury severity score , and type of trauma (blunt, penetrating, or other) was used to compare PPs and the CG. Primary outcomes were mortality, disposition, length of stay (LOS), and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 1078 traumatically injured pregnant females were identified. Propensity score matching resulted in 990 patients in the PP and CG cohorts. After matching, PPs were more likely to be assault victims (11% versus 6%, P < 0.001), had longer length of stay (LOS) (5 versus 3 d, P < 0.001), and were more likely to require mechanical ventilation (26% versus 16%, P < 0.001) or intensive care unit (ICU) admission (44% versus 32%, P < 0.001). PPs were more likely to proceed directly to the operating room (OR)(34% versus 15%, P < 0.001) and less likely to be discharged home from the emergency department (ED) (1% versus 12%, P < 0.001). Complications and mortality rates were similar among PPs.

CONCLUSIONS

After acute trauma, PPs did not have increased mortality or complications when compared to matched controls, although they were more likely to be victims of assault, directly proceed to the OR, require mechanical ventilation or ICU admission, and have longer LOSs.

摘要

简介

创伤是导致非产科产妇死亡的主要原因。急性创伤孕妇(PP)的院内结局与年龄匹配的非妊娠对照组(CG)相比如何,目前尚未描述。我们假设与匹配的 CG 相比,急性创伤性损伤的 PP 会有更差的结局。

材料和方法

使用美国外科医师学院创伤质量改进计划(TQIP)来确定 2017 年至 2019 年间受伤的女性。使用年龄、种族、创伤严重程度评分和创伤类型(钝性、穿透性或其他)的倾向评分匹配来比较 PP 和 CG。主要结局是死亡率、处置、住院时间(LOS)和并发症。

结果

共确定了 1078 名创伤性受伤的孕妇。倾向评分匹配后,PP 和 CG 队列中各有 990 名患者。匹配后,PP 更有可能是袭击受害者(11%对 6%,P<0.001),住院时间(LOS)更长(5 对 3 天,P<0.001),更有可能需要机械通气(26%对 16%,P<0.001)或重症监护病房(ICU)入院(44%对 32%,P<0.001)。PP 更有可能直接进入手术室(OR)(34%对 15%,P<0.001),而不太可能从急诊室(ED)直接出院回家(1%对 12%,P<0.001)。PP 的并发症和死亡率与对照组相似。

结论

与匹配对照组相比,急性创伤后,PP 的死亡率或并发症没有增加,尽管她们更有可能成为袭击受害者,直接进入 OR,需要机械通气或 ICU 入院,以及 LOS 更长。

相似文献

1
Traumatic Injury in Pregnancy: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.妊娠创伤:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Surg Res. 2023 Mar;283:1018-1025. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.10.087. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
2
Teen trauma without the drama: outcomes of adolescents treated at Ohio adult versus pediatric trauma centers.青少年创伤无戏剧化:在俄亥俄州成人和儿科创伤中心治疗的青少年的结果。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Jul;77(1):109-16; discussion 116. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000277.
3
Pediatric sports-related traumatic brain injury in United States trauma centers.美国创伤中心的儿童运动相关创伤性脑损伤
Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Apr;40(4):E3. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.FOCUS15612.
4
Emergency Department Length of Stay and Mortality in Critically Injured Patients.急诊科停留时间与危重症创伤患者死亡率的关系。
J Intensive Care Med. 2022 Feb;37(2):278-287. doi: 10.1177/0885066621995426. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
5
Validation of new trauma triage rules for trauma attending response to the emergency department.急诊科创伤主治医生应对新创伤分诊规则的验证
J Trauma. 2002 Jun;52(6):1153-8; discussion 1158-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200206000-00022.
6
Race and Insurance Status Disparities in Post-discharge Disposition After Hospitalization for Major Trauma.种族和保险状况对重大创伤住院后出院处置的差异。
Am Surg. 2023 Mar;89(3):379-389. doi: 10.1177/00031348211029864. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
7
"One-way-street" streamlined admission of critically ill trauma patients reduces emergency department length of stay.“单行道”式优化流程对危重症创伤患者的收治可缩短急诊科停留时间。
Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;12(7):1019-1024. doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1511-x. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
8
Variability in management of blunt liver trauma and contribution of level of American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma verification status on mortality.钝性肝外伤处理中的变异性和美国外科医师学院创伤委员会验证状态对死亡率的影响。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Feb;84(2):273-279. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001743.
9
Geriatric trauma, frailty, and ACS trauma center verification level: Are there any correlations with outcomes?老年创伤、虚弱与 ACS 创伤中心验证级别:与结局是否存在相关性?
Injury. 2024 Jan;55(1):110972. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.110972. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
10
Adult sports-related traumatic brain injury in United States trauma centers.美国创伤中心的成人运动相关创伤性脑损伤
Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Apr;40(4):E4. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.FOCUS15613.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergency cesarean section in pregnant trauma patients presenting after motor vehicle collision.机动车碰撞后出现的创伤孕妇的急诊剖宫产术。
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 28;10(19):e38707. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38707. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.