Department of Human Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Department of Exercise Science, Grove City College, Grove City, PA, USA.
Exp Physiol. 2023 May;108(5):715-727. doi: 10.1113/EP091029. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
What is the central question of the study? Can a novel, energy-dense and lightweight ketogenic bar (1000 kcal) consumed 3 h before exercise modulate steady-state incline rucksack march ('ruck') performance compared to isocaloric carbohydrate bars in recreationally active, college-aged men? What is the main finding and its importance? Acute ingestion of either nutritional bar sustained ∼1 h of exhaustive rucking with a 30% of body weight rucksack. This proof-of-concept study is the first to demonstrate that carbohydrate bars and lipid bars are equally feasible for preserving ruck performance. Novel ketogenic nutrition bars may have military-relevant applications to lessen carry load without compromising exercise capacity.
Rucksack marches ('rucks') are strenuous, military-relevant exercises that may benefit from pre-event fuelling. The purpose of this investigation was to explore whether acute ingestion of carbohydrate- or lipid-based nutritional bars before rucking can elicit unique advantages that augment exercise performance. Recreationally active and healthy males (n = 29) were randomized and counterbalanced to consume 1000 kcal derived from a novel, energy-dense (percentage energy from carbohydrate/fat/protein: 5/83/12) ketogenic bar (KB), or isocaloric high-carbohydrate bars (CB; 61/23/16) 3 h before a time-to-exhaustion (TTE) ruck. Conditions were separated by a 1-week washout. The rucksack weight was standardized to 30% of bodyweight. Steady-state treadmill pace was set at 3.2 km/h (0.89 m/s) and 14% grade. TTE was the primary outcome; respiratory exchange ratio (RER), capillary ketones (R-β-hydroxybutyrate), glucose and lactate, plus subjective thirst/hunger were the secondary outcomes. Mean TTE was similar between conditions (KB: 55 ± 25 vs. CB: 54 ± 22 min; P = 0.687). The RER and substrate oxidation rates revealed greater fat and carbohydrate oxidation after the KB and CB, respectively (all P < 0.0001). Capillary R-βHB increased modestly after the KB ingestion (P < 0.0001). Neither bar influenced glycaemia. Lactate increased during the ruck independent of the condition (P < 0.0001). Thirst/fullness perceptions changed independent of the nutritional bar consumed. A novel KB nutritional bar produced equivalent TTE ruck results to the isocaloric CBs. The KB's energy density relative to CB (6.6 vs. 3.8 kcal/g) may provide a lightweight (-42% weight), pre-event fuelling alternative that does not compromise ruck physical performance.
研究的核心问题是什么?在娱乐活跃的大学生男性中,在运动前 3 小时摄入一种新型、高能量和轻量级的生酮棒(1000 卡路里),与等热量的碳水化合物棒相比,是否可以调节稳态倾斜背包行军(“背包”)表现?主要发现及其重要性是什么?急性摄入任何一种营养棒都能维持长达 1 小时的高强度背包行军,背包重量为自身体重的 30%。这项概念验证研究首次表明,碳水化合物棒和脂肪棒同样可以有效地保持背包行军的表现。新型生酮营养棒可能具有与军事相关的应用,在不影响运动能力的情况下减轻携带负荷。
背包行军是一种艰苦的、与军事相关的运动,可能需要在运动前进行补给。本研究旨在探讨在背包行军前摄入碳水化合物或脂肪基营养棒是否能产生独特的优势,从而增强运动表现。研究招募了 29 名身体健康的、有规律锻炼的男性,他们被随机分配并平衡摄入 1000 卡路里的新型高能量密度(碳水化合物/脂肪/蛋白质的能量百分比:5/83/12)生酮棒(KB)或等热量的高碳水化合物棒(CB),在时间耗尽(TTE)背包前 3 小时。条件之间用 1 周的洗脱期隔开。背包的重量标准化为自身体重的 30%。稳态跑步机的速度设定为 3.2 公里/小时(0.89 米/秒)和 14%的坡度。TTE 是主要结果;呼吸交换率(RER)、毛细血管酮体(R-β-羟丁酸)、葡萄糖和乳酸,以及主观口渴/饥饿感是次要结果。两种情况下的平均 TTE 相似(KB:55±25 分钟;CB:54±22 分钟;P=0.687)。RER 和底物氧化率显示,KB 和 CB 分别导致更多的脂肪和碳水化合物氧化(均 P<0.0001)。KB 摄入后毛细血管 R-βHB 略有增加(P<0.0001)。两种棒都没有影响血糖水平。乳酸在背包行军过程中增加,与条件无关(P<0.0001)。口渴/饱腹感的变化与所消耗的营养棒无关。一种新型的 KB 营养棒与等热量的 CB 棒产生了等效的 TTE 背包行军结果。与 CB(6.6 卡路里/克)相比,KB 的能量密度(6.6 卡路里/克)相对较高,可能提供一种轻便(重量减轻 42%)、运动前的燃料选择,而不会损害背包行军的身体表现。