• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
India's Traditional Knowledge Digital Library and the Politics of Patent Classifications.印度传统知识数字图书馆与专利分类政治
Law Crit. 2023;34(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s10978-021-09299-7. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
2
AYUSH digital initiatives: Harnessing the power of digital technology for India's traditional medical systems.阿育吠陀数字计划:利用数字技术的力量推动印度传统医学体系发展。
J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2022 Apr-Jun;13(2):100498. doi: 10.1016/j.jaim.2021.07.014. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
3
India's Potential as a Leader in Cancer Care Progress in the Future: A Synthetic Interdisciplinary Perspective.印度在癌症护理领域未来成为领导者的潜力:一个综合性跨学科视角
Cureus. 2024 Oct 5;16(10):e70892. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70892. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
Intellectual property rights and patents in perspective of Ayurveda.阿育吠陀视角下的知识产权与专利
Ayu. 2012 Jan;33(1):20-6. doi: 10.4103/0974-8520.100298.
5
A socio-ecological critique on India's local health traditions amidst rising incidence of global pandemics.在全球大流行发病率不断上升的背景下,对印度本土健康传统的社会生态批判。
J Herb Med. 2022 Jul;34:100578. doi: 10.1016/j.hermed.2022.100578. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
6
Biopiracy and the ethics of medical heritage: the case of India's traditional knowledge digital library'.生物剽窃与医学遗产伦理:以印度传统知识数字图书馆为例
J Med Humanit. 2012 Sep;33(3):175-83. doi: 10.1007/s10912-012-9179-3.
7
"To patent or not to patent? the case of Novartis' cancer drug Glivec in India".是否申请专利?诺华抗癌药物格列卫在印度的案例。
Global Health. 2014 Jan 6;10:3. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-10-3.
8
Challenges and prospects in india's digital health journey.印度数字健康之旅中的挑战与前景。
Indian J Public Health. 2021 Apr-Jun;65(2):209-212. doi: 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_1446_20.
9
Agenda Setting and Policy Adoption of India's National Health Insurance Scheme: .印度国家医疗保险计划的议程设定与政策采纳:
Health Syst Reform. 2015 Feb 17;1(2):107-118. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2015.1034310.
10
National health policy for traditional medicine in India.印度传统医学国家卫生政策。
World Health Forum. 1995;16(2):190-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Government policies and initiatives for development of Ayurveda.政府发展阿育吠陀的政策和举措。
J Ethnopharmacol. 2017 Feb 2;197:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2016.08.018. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
2
"Trust me": patent offices in developing countries.“相信我”:发展中国家的专利局。
Am J Law Med. 2008;34(2-3):151-74. doi: 10.1177/009885880803400205.
3
Commodification of the sacred through intellectual property rights.通过知识产权对神圣事物进行商品化。
J Ethnopharmacol. 2002 Nov;83(1-2):3-12. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(02)00189-7.

印度传统知识数字图书馆与专利分类政治

India's Traditional Knowledge Digital Library and the Politics of Patent Classifications.

作者信息

Fredriksson Martin

机构信息

Department of Culture and Society, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

Law Crit. 2023;34(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s10978-021-09299-7. Epub 2021 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1007/s10978-021-09299-7
PMID:36915708
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9999701/
Abstract

This article analyzes India's Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL) as a potential intervention in the administration of patent law. The TKDL is a database including a vast body of traditional medical knowledge from India, aiming to prevent the patenting and misappropriation of that knowledge. This article contextualizes the TKDL in relation to documentation theory as well as to existing research on the uses of databases to protect traditional knowledge. It explores the TKDL's potential consequences for India's traditional medical knowledge and the wider implications that traditional knowledge databases can have for the safeguarding of traditional knowledge in general. The article concludes that on the one hand the TKDL bridges the gap between the main branches of Indian traditional medicine and the formal knowledge system of International Patent Classifications. Furthermore, it has also inspired revisions of the International Patent Classification system, which makes it better adapted to incorporate traditional medical knowledge. On the other hand, critical research on traditional knowledge documentation argues that traditional knowledge databases, like the TKDL, can decontextualize the knowledge they catalogue and dispossess its original owners. The TKDL, however, also fits into a national, Indian agenda of documenting and modernizing traditional medicine that predates the formation of the TKDL by several decades and challenges the dichotomy between traditional and scientific knowledge systems that originally motivated the formation of the TKDL.

摘要

本文分析了印度传统知识数字图书馆(TKDL)作为专利法管理方面的一种潜在干预措施。TKDL是一个数据库,包含大量来自印度的传统医学知识,旨在防止该知识被专利化和被挪用。本文将TKDL置于文献理论以及关于利用数据库保护传统知识的现有研究的背景下进行探讨。它探究了TKDL对印度传统医学知识可能产生的后果,以及传统知识数据库总体上对保护传统知识可能具有的更广泛影响。文章得出结论,一方面,TKDL弥合了印度传统医学主要分支与国际专利分类的形式知识体系之间的差距。此外,它还促使对国际专利分类系统进行修订,使其更能适应纳入传统医学知识。另一方面,关于传统知识文献记录的批判性研究认为,像TKDL这样的传统知识数据库可能会使其所编目的知识脱离背景,并剥夺其原始所有者的权益。然而,TKDL也符合印度在TKDL形成前几十年就已存在的记录和使传统医学现代化的国家议程,并对最初促使TKDL形成的传统知识体系与科学知识体系之间的二分法提出了挑战。