Suppr超能文献

印度传统知识数字图书馆与专利分类政治

India's Traditional Knowledge Digital Library and the Politics of Patent Classifications.

作者信息

Fredriksson Martin

机构信息

Department of Culture and Society, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

Law Crit. 2023;34(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s10978-021-09299-7. Epub 2021 Jun 12.

Abstract

This article analyzes India's Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL) as a potential intervention in the administration of patent law. The TKDL is a database including a vast body of traditional medical knowledge from India, aiming to prevent the patenting and misappropriation of that knowledge. This article contextualizes the TKDL in relation to documentation theory as well as to existing research on the uses of databases to protect traditional knowledge. It explores the TKDL's potential consequences for India's traditional medical knowledge and the wider implications that traditional knowledge databases can have for the safeguarding of traditional knowledge in general. The article concludes that on the one hand the TKDL bridges the gap between the main branches of Indian traditional medicine and the formal knowledge system of International Patent Classifications. Furthermore, it has also inspired revisions of the International Patent Classification system, which makes it better adapted to incorporate traditional medical knowledge. On the other hand, critical research on traditional knowledge documentation argues that traditional knowledge databases, like the TKDL, can decontextualize the knowledge they catalogue and dispossess its original owners. The TKDL, however, also fits into a national, Indian agenda of documenting and modernizing traditional medicine that predates the formation of the TKDL by several decades and challenges the dichotomy between traditional and scientific knowledge systems that originally motivated the formation of the TKDL.

摘要

本文分析了印度传统知识数字图书馆(TKDL)作为专利法管理方面的一种潜在干预措施。TKDL是一个数据库,包含大量来自印度的传统医学知识,旨在防止该知识被专利化和被挪用。本文将TKDL置于文献理论以及关于利用数据库保护传统知识的现有研究的背景下进行探讨。它探究了TKDL对印度传统医学知识可能产生的后果,以及传统知识数据库总体上对保护传统知识可能具有的更广泛影响。文章得出结论,一方面,TKDL弥合了印度传统医学主要分支与国际专利分类的形式知识体系之间的差距。此外,它还促使对国际专利分类系统进行修订,使其更能适应纳入传统医学知识。另一方面,关于传统知识文献记录的批判性研究认为,像TKDL这样的传统知识数据库可能会使其所编目的知识脱离背景,并剥夺其原始所有者的权益。然而,TKDL也符合印度在TKDL形成前几十年就已存在的记录和使传统医学现代化的国家议程,并对最初促使TKDL形成的传统知识体系与科学知识体系之间的二分法提出了挑战。

相似文献

8
Challenges and prospects in india's digital health journey.印度数字健康之旅中的挑战与前景。
Indian J Public Health. 2021 Apr-Jun;65(2):209-212. doi: 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_1446_20.

本文引用的文献

1
Government policies and initiatives for development of Ayurveda.政府发展阿育吠陀的政策和举措。
J Ethnopharmacol. 2017 Feb 2;197:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2016.08.018. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
2
"Trust me": patent offices in developing countries.“相信我”:发展中国家的专利局。
Am J Law Med. 2008;34(2-3):151-74. doi: 10.1177/009885880803400205.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验