Suppr超能文献

比较司库奇尤单抗与肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂治疗 Takayasu 动脉炎的疗效。

Comparative Efficacy of Secukinumab Versus Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors for the Treatment of Takayasu Arteritis.

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Beijing, China.

Department of Rheumatology, Weihai Municipal Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Weihai, China.

出版信息

Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023 Aug;75(8):1415-1423. doi: 10.1002/art.42496. Epub 2023 Jun 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha and interleukin-17 (IL-17) are thought to be involved in the pathogenesis of Takayasu arteritis (TAK), and TNF inhibitors (TNFi) are recommended for the treatment of TAK. The present study was undertaken to investigate the efficacy of secukinumab, an IL-17A monoclonal antibody, compared to treatment with TNFi.

METHODS

This was a prospective, single-center, open-label cohort study. Patients with active TAK who did not respond to treatment with glucocorticoids combined with 2 immunosuppressive agents were treated with either secukinumab or TNFi as an add-on therapy without an increased dosage of glucocorticoids. A complete response was defined as complete resolution of signs and symptoms of active disease, normal values of inflammatory markers, no progression on imaging of involved arteries, and dose of glucocorticoid <15 mg/day. A partial response was similarly defined as a complete response except with an erythrocyte sedimentation rate <40 mm/hour and C-reactive protein level of <20 mg/liter.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients in the secukinumab group and 34 patients in the TNFi group were enrolled. The demographic data and inflammatory markers of the 2 groups were comparable at baseline. Complete response and partial response for patients treated with secukinumab and TNFi were 31.6% and 58.8% (P = 0.057), respectively, at 3 months and 52.6% and 64.7%, respectively, at 6 months (P = 0.389).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that secukinumab and TNFi are effective for patients with TAK who do not respond to oral glucocorticoids and conventional immunosuppressive agents, with similar response rates at 3 and 6 months.

摘要

目的

肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)α和白细胞介素-17(IL-17)被认为参与了大动脉炎(TAK)的发病机制,并且推荐使用 TNF 抑制剂(TNFi)治疗 TAK。本研究旨在探讨白细胞介素-17A 单克隆抗体司库珠单抗与 TNFi 治疗相比的疗效。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、单中心、开放标签队列研究。未对糖皮质激素联合两种免疫抑制剂治疗无反应的活动期 TAK 患者,在不增加糖皮质激素剂量的情况下,加用司库珠单抗或 TNFi 作为附加治疗。完全缓解定义为活动性疾病的所有体征和症状完全消退,炎症标志物值恢复正常,受累动脉影像学无进展,且糖皮质激素剂量<15mg/天。部分缓解的定义类似,只是红细胞沉降率<40mm/小时和 C 反应蛋白<20mg/升。

结果

司库珠单抗组和 TNFi 组分别纳入 19 例和 34 例患者。两组患者的人口统计学数据和炎症标志物在基线时具有可比性。司库珠单抗和 TNFi 治疗的患者在 3 个月时完全缓解和部分缓解的比例分别为 31.6%和 58.8%(P=0.057),在 6 个月时分别为 52.6%和 64.7%(P=0.389)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,对于对口服糖皮质激素和常规免疫抑制剂治疗无反应的 TAK 患者,司库珠单抗和 TNFi 均有效,在 3 个月和 6 个月时的缓解率相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验