• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Association Between California's State Insurance Gender Nondiscrimination Act and Utilization of Gender-Affirming Surgery.加利福尼亚州保险性别平等待遇法案与性别肯定手术的利用之间的关联。
JAMA. 2023 Mar 14;329(10):819-826. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.0878.
2
California's State Insurance Gender Nondiscrimination Act and Utilization of Gender-Affirming Surgery.加利福尼亚州的《州保险性别非歧视法案》与性别确认手术的使用情况
JAMA. 2023 Jun 27;329(24):2193. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.7928.
3
California's State Insurance Gender Nondiscrimination Act and Utilization of Gender-Affirming Surgery-Reply.加利福尼亚州保险性别非歧视法案与性别肯定手术的使用——回应
JAMA. 2023 Jun 27;329(24):2193-2194. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.7931.
4
Health Insurance Coverage of Permanent Hair Removal in Transgender and Gender-Minority Patients.跨性别和性别少数群体患者的永久性脱毛的医疗保险覆盖范围。
JAMA Dermatol. 2020 May 1;156(5):561-565. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.0480.
5
Association of Nondiscrimination Policies With Mental Health Among Gender Minority Individuals.非歧视政策与跨性别者心理健康的关联。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 1;77(9):952-958. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.0770.
6
Associations Between Transgender Exclusion Prohibitions and Insurance Coverage of Gender-Affirming Surgery.跨性别排斥禁令与性别肯定手术保险覆盖范围之间的关联。
LGBT Health. 2020 Jul;7(5):254-263. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2019.0212. Epub 2020 May 7.
7
A Review of Insurance Coverage of Gender-Affirming Genital Surgery.《关于性别肯定性生殖器手术保险覆盖范围的综述》
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Mar;145(3):803-812. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006591.
8
National Legislative Favorability and Insurance Coverage for Adult and Adolescent Gender-Affirming Surgery.国家立法对成人和青少年性别肯定手术的支持度和保险覆盖范围。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Jun 1;153(6):1433-1440. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011123. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
9
National Variation of Insurance Coverage for Gender-Affirming Facial Feminization Surgery.全国范围内性别肯定面部 feminization 手术的保险覆盖范围的变化。
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2021 Jul-Aug;23(4):270-277. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0226. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
10
Insurance Coverage of Facial Gender Affirmation Surgery: A Review of Medicaid and Commercial Insurance.面部性别肯定手术的保险覆盖范围:医疗补助和商业保险综述
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Dec;165(6):791-797. doi: 10.1177/0194599821997734. Epub 2021 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Commentary: Accessibility and Insurance Coverage for Gender-Affirming Surgery in Canada: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.评论:加拿大性别确认手术的可及性与保险覆盖范围:一项横断面分析。
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2024 Oct 22:22925503241292355. doi: 10.1177/22925503241292355.
2
Access to transition-related health care among transmasculine people in India: A mixed-methods investigation.印度跨性别男性获得与过渡相关医疗保健的情况:一项混合方法研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Oct 29;4(10):e0003506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003506. eCollection 2024.
3
Unmet Healthcare Needs and Medical Cannabis Use Among Sexual and Gender Minoritized Adults in a High-Stigma Environment.高污名环境下性少数和性别少数成年人未满足的医疗需求与医用大麻使用情况
J Homosex. 2025 Jan 2;72(1):1-19. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2024.2302427. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
4
Medicare Eligibility and Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Operative Fixation for Distal Radius Fracture.医疗保险资格与桡骨远端骨折手术固定的种族和民族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2349621. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.49621.

本文引用的文献

1
Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8.《跨性别和性别多样化人群健康照护标准》第8版
Int J Transgend Health. 2022 Sep 6;23(Suppl 1):S1-S259. doi: 10.1080/26895269.2022.2100644. eCollection 2022.
2
Association Between Gender-Affirming Surgeries and Mental Health Outcomes.性别肯定手术与心理健康结果的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Jul 1;156(7):611-618. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0952.
3
Reduction in Mental Health Treatment Utilization Among Transgender Individuals After Gender-Affirming Surgeries: A Total Population Study.跨性别个体接受性别肯定手术后心理健康治疗利用率降低:一项全人群研究。
Am J Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 1;177(8):727-734. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19010080. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
4
Psychosocial Resources and Quality of Life in Transgender Women following Gender-Affirming Surgery.跨性别女性接受性别肯定手术后的心理社会资源与生活质量。
J Sex Med. 2019 Oct;16(10):1672-1680. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.08.007.
5
Ensuring Comprehensive Care and Support for Transgender and Gender-Diverse Children and Adolescents.保障跨性别和性别多样化儿童及青少年的全面关怀和支持。
Pediatrics. 2018 Oct;142(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2162. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
6
Trends in Gender-affirming Surgery in Insured Patients in the United States.美国参保患者性别确认手术的趋势
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Apr 16;6(4):e1738. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001738. eCollection 2018 Apr.
7
Temporal Trends in Gender-Affirming Surgery Among Transgender Patients in the United States.美国跨性别患者中性别肯定手术的时间趋势。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Jul 1;153(7):609-616. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.6231.
8
Mental health and gender dysphoria: A review of the literature.心理健康与性别焦虑症:文献综述
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2016;28(1):44-57. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2015.1115753.
9
Societal Implications of Health Insurance Coverage for Medically Necessary Services in the U.S. Transgender Population: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.美国跨性别群体医保覆盖必要医疗服务的社会影响:一项成本效益分析
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Apr;31(4):394-401. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3529-6. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
10
Methods for evaluating changes in health care policy: the difference-in-differences approach.评估医疗保健政策变化的方法:双重差分法
JAMA. 2014 Dec 10;312(22):2401-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.16153.

加利福尼亚州保险性别平等待遇法案与性别肯定手术的利用之间的关联。

Association Between California's State Insurance Gender Nondiscrimination Act and Utilization of Gender-Affirming Surgery.

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus.

The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus.

出版信息

JAMA. 2023 Mar 14;329(10):819-826. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.0878.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2023.0878
PMID:36917051
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10015311/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Gender-affirming surgery is often beneficial for gender-diverse or -dysphoric patients. Access to gender-affirming surgery is often limited through restrictive legislation and insurance policies.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between California's 2013 implementation of the Insurance Gender Nondiscrimination Act, which prohibits insurers and health plans from limiting benefits based on a patient's sex, gender, gender identity, or gender expression, and utilization of gender-affirming surgery among California residents.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Population epidemiology study of transgender and gender-diverse patients undergoing gender-affirming surgery (facial, chest, and genital surgery) between 2005 and 2019. Utilization of gender-affirming surgery in California before and after implementation of the Insurance Gender Nondiscrimination Act in July 2013 was compared with utilization in Washington and Arizona, control states chosen because of geographic similarity and because they expanded Medicaid on the same date as California-January 1, 2014. The date of last follow-up was December 31, 2019.

EXPOSURES

California's Insurance Gender Nondiscrimination Act, implemented on July 9, 2013.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Receipt of gender-affirming surgery, defined as undergoing at least 1 facial, chest, or genital procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 25 252 patients (California: n = 17 934 [71%]; control: n = 7328 [29%]) had a diagnosis of gender dysphoria. Median ages were 34.0 years in California (with or without gender-affirming surgery), 39 years (IQR, 28-49 years) among those undergoing gender-affirming surgery in control states, and 36 years (IQR, 22-56 years) among those not undergoing gender-affirming surgery in control states. Patients underwent at least 1 gender-affirming surgery within the study period in 2918 (11.6%) admissions-2715 (15.1%) in California vs 203 (2.8%) in control states. There was a statistically significant increase in gender-affirming surgery in the third quarter of July 2013 in California vs control states, coinciding with the timing of the Insurance Gender Nondiscrimination Act (P < .001). Implementation of the policy was associated with an absolute 12.1% (95% CI, 10.3%-13.9%; P < .001) increase in the probability of undergoing gender-affirming surgery in California vs control states observed in the subset of insured patients (13.4% [95% CI, 11.5%-15.4%]; P < .001) but not self-pay patients (-22.6% [95% CI, -32.8% to -12.5%]; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Implementation in California of its Insurance Gender Nondiscrimination Act was associated with a significant increase in utilization of gender-affirming surgery in California compared with the control states Washington and Arizona. These data might inform state legislative efforts to craft policies preventing discrimination in health coverage for state residents, including transgender and gender-diverse patients.

摘要

重要性:性别肯定手术通常对性别多样化或性别不适的患者有益。通过限制立法和保险政策,获得性别肯定手术的机会往往受到限制。

目的:研究 2013 年加利福尼亚州实施的《保险性别非歧视法》(该法禁止保险公司和健康计划根据患者的性别、性别、性别认同或性别表达来限制福利)与加利福尼亚州居民接受性别肯定手术之间的关联。

设计、地点和参与者:对 2005 年至 2019 年期间接受性别肯定手术(面部、胸部和生殖器手术)的跨性别和性别多样化患者进行的人口流行病学研究。在 2013 年 7 月《保险性别非歧视法》实施之前和之后,加利福尼亚州与华盛顿州和亚利桑那州(选择这两个州是因为地理位置相似,并且与加利福尼亚州一样在 2014 年 1 月 1 日扩大了医疗补助)相比,加利福尼亚州利用性别肯定手术的情况进行了比较。最后一次随访日期为 2019 年 12 月 31 日。

暴露情况:加利福尼亚州的《保险性别非歧视法》于 2013 年 7 月 9 日实施。

主要结果和措施:接受性别肯定手术,定义为至少进行 1 次面部、胸部或生殖器手术。

结果:共有 25252 名患者(加利福尼亚州:n=17934[71%];对照组:n=7328[29%])被诊断为性别焦虑症。中位数年龄在加利福尼亚州为 34.0 岁(无论是否接受性别肯定手术),对照组中接受性别肯定手术的患者为 39 岁(IQR,28-49 岁),对照组中未接受性别肯定手术的患者为 36 岁(IQR,22-56 岁)。在研究期间,有 2918 例(11.6%)入院患者至少进行了 1 次性别肯定手术-加利福尼亚州 2715 例(15.1%),对照组 203 例(2.8%)。加利福尼亚州与对照组相比,在 2013 年 7 月第三季度性别肯定手术数量呈显著增加,与《保险性别非歧视法》的实施时间一致(P<.001)。该政策的实施与加利福尼亚州与对照组相比,接受保险的患者(13.4%[95%CI,11.5%-15.4%];P<.001)中接受性别肯定手术的概率绝对增加了 12.1%(95%CI,10.3%-13.9%),但在自付患者中并未增加(-22.6%[95%CI,-32.8%至-12.5%];P<.001)。

结论和相关性:加利福尼亚州实施《保险性别非歧视法》后,加利福尼亚州接受性别肯定手术的人数与华盛顿州和亚利桑那州(对照组)相比显著增加。这些数据可能为州立法工作提供信息,以制定防止州居民(包括跨性别和性别多样化患者)在健康保险方面受到歧视的政策。