Suppr超能文献

从 WATCHMAN V.2.5 到 WATCHMAN FLX 左心耳封堵术的转换:超声心动图和临床研究。

Transition from WATCHMAN V.2.5 to WATCHMAN FLX for closure of the left atrial appendage: echocardiographic and clinical findings.

机构信息

Department of Medicine II, Sankt Johann Nepomuk, Catholic Hospital Erfurt, Erfurt, Thüringen, Germany.

Department of Medicine II, Sankt Johann Nepomuk, Catholic Hospital Erfurt, Erfurt, Thüringen, Germany

出版信息

Open Heart. 2023 Mar;10(1). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002246.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Interventional closure of the left atrial appendage (LAAC) has been established as an alternative treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and an elevated risk of stroke. The WATCHMAN FLX (WM FLX) as the newest WATCHMAN LAAC device differs in several technical characteristics from its precursor, the WATCHMAN V.2.5 (WM V.2.5).

METHODS

The data presented here are derived from a retrospective single-centre study. All patients in which an LAAC was performed between February 2017 and March 2021 with either a WM V.2.5 or WM FLX device were included.

RESULTS

169 patients were included in this study, of whom 95 had been treated with WM V.2.5 and 74 with WM FLX, respectively. Directly after implantation, only minor differences regarding membrane thickness and connector protrusion were noted, whereas no relevant differences were found regarding device sizing, device compression or peridevice leakage, respectively. However, at 3-month follow-up, device compression was significantly reduced in WM FLX indicating a continued device expansion which was paralleled by a reduced number of peridevice leakage in comparison to WM V.2.5. Additionally, the combined clinical endpoint of death, stroke/transistoric ischaemic attack, tamponade, device embolisation, device-related thrombosis or peridevice leakage was reduced in WM FLX.

CONCLUSION

LAAC using the WM FLX device results in a continued device expansion over the first 3 months based on differences in radial force in comparison to WM V.2.5. This is accompanied by a reduction in adverse clinical endpoints.

摘要

简介

经皮左心耳封堵术(LAAC)已被确立为治疗房颤(AF)且有较高中风风险患者的一种替代疗法。与前代 WATCHMAN V.2.5(WM V.2.5)相比,最新的 WATCHMAN FLX(WM FLX)在几个技术特征上有所不同。

方法

这里呈现的数据来源于一项回顾性单中心研究。所有在 2017 年 2 月至 2021 年 3 月期间接受 LAAC 治疗且使用 WM V.2.5 或 WM FLX 装置的患者均被纳入研究。

结果

本研究共纳入 169 例患者,其中 95 例接受 WM V.2.5 治疗,74 例接受 WM FLX 治疗。植入后即刻,仅观察到膜厚度和连接器突出方面的细微差异,而在装置尺寸、装置压缩或装置周围漏方面未发现显著差异。然而,在 3 个月随访时,WM FLX 的装置压缩明显减小,表明装置持续扩张,与 WM V.2.5 相比,装置周围漏的数量减少。此外,与 WM V.2.5 相比,WM FLX 的联合临床终点(死亡、卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作、心脏压塞、装置栓塞、装置相关血栓形成或装置周围漏)减少。

结论

与 WM V.2.5 相比,WM FLX 装置的 LAAC 在最初 3 个月内会持续扩张,这与径向力的差异有关。这与不良临床终点的减少有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验