• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在存在或不存在上部结构的情况下,三种不同缺损形态下非手术和手术种植体表面去污方法的体外疗效。

In vitro efficacy of non-surgical and surgical implant surface decontamination methods in three different defect configurations in the presence or absence of a suprastructure.

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Center for Dentistry and Oral Medicine (Carolinum), Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.

Private Practice, Frankfurt, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023 Jun;25(3):549-563. doi: 10.1111/cid.13198. Epub 2023 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1111/cid.13198
PMID:36918345
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Analysis of the in vitro efficacy of non-surgical and surgical dental implant surface decontamination with or without suprastructure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three hundred and sixty implants were dipped in indelible red and distributed to 30°, 60°, or 90° angulated bone defect models. One hundred and twenty implants were used for each bone defect, 40 of which were assigned to a decontamination method (CUR: curette; SOSC: soundscaler; APA: air powder abrasion). Of these, 20 were subjected to a simulated non-surgical (NST) or surgical treatment (ST), with/without mucosa mask, of which 10 were carried out with (S+) or without (S-) suprastructure. Uncleaned implant surface was assessed by both-sided implant surface photography. Surface morphology changes were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

RESULTS

Cleaning efficacy was significantly better within NST if the suprastructure was removed (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found within ST (p = 0.304). Overall, cleaning efficacy in the order APA > SOSC>CUR decreased significantly (p < 0.0001) for both S+ and S- in NST as well as ST. Separated by NST/ST, S+/S-, defect angulation and decontamination method, only isolated significant differences in cleaning efficacy were present. Linear regression analysis revealed significant associations of remnants with the treatment approach, decontamination method, and defect angle (p < 0.0001). SEM micrographs showed serious surface damage after use of CUR and SOSC.

CONCLUSIONS

Suprastructure removal is an additional option to improve cleaning efficacy of non-surgical implant surface decontamination in this in vitro model.

摘要

目的

分析非手术和手术条件下,有无上部结构时,对牙科植入物表面进行去污的体外疗效。

材料与方法

将 360 个不可磨灭红色染料浸染的种植体分别放置于 30°、60°和 90°牙槽骨缺损模型中。每个骨缺损模型使用 120 个种植体,其中 40 个种植体用于不同的去污方法(CUR:刮治器;SOSC:超声器械;APA:空气动力喷砂)。其中,20 个种植体用于模拟非手术(NST)或手术(ST)处理,有/无黏膜保护,其中 10 个有/无上部结构。通过双侧种植体表面摄影评估未清洁的种植体表面。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析表面形貌变化。

结果

如果去除上部结构,NST 时的清洁效果明显更好(p<0.001)。ST 时无显著差异(p=0.304)。总体而言,NST 和 ST 时,S+和 S-均为 APA>SOSC>CUR,清洁效果呈显著下降趋势(p<0.0001)。根据 NST/ST、S+/S-、缺损角度和去污方法进行分组,只有在 NST/ST、S+/S-、缺损角度和去污方法的清洁效果方面存在显著差异。线性回归分析显示,残留物与治疗方法、去污方法和缺损角度之间存在显著相关性(p<0.0001)。SEM 显微照片显示,CUR 和 SOSC 使用后表面严重受损。

结论

在该体外模型中,去除上部结构是提高非手术种植体表面去污效果的附加选择。

相似文献

1
In vitro efficacy of non-surgical and surgical implant surface decontamination methods in three different defect configurations in the presence or absence of a suprastructure.在存在或不存在上部结构的情况下,三种不同缺损形态下非手术和手术种植体表面去污方法的体外疗效。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023 Jun;25(3):549-563. doi: 10.1111/cid.13198. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
2
In Vitro Efficacy of Three Different Nonsurgical Implant Surface Decontamination Methods in Three Different Defect Configurations.三种不同缺陷构型下三种不同非手术种植体表面去污方法的体外疗效。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 Mar-Apr;36(2):271-280. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8864.
3
In vitro efficacy of three different implant surface decontamination methods in three different defect configurations.三种不同种植体表面去污方法在三种不同缺损形态下的体外疗效
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Jun;30(6):550-558. doi: 10.1111/clr.13441. Epub 2019 May 8.
4
In vitro surgical and non-surgical air-polishing efficacy for implant surface decontamination in three different defect configurations.体外手术和非手术空气抛光对三种不同缺损形态种植体表面去污效果的研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Apr;25(4):1743-1754. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03476-1. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
5
Comparison of decontamination efficacy of two electrolyte cleaning methods to diode laser, plasma, and air-abrasive devices.两种电解质清洗方法与二极管激光、等离子体和喷砂设备的去污效果比较。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jun;26(6):4549-4558. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04421-0. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
6
In vitro cleaning potential of three different implant debridement methods.三种不同种植体清创方法的体外清洁潜力
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Mar;26(3):314-9. doi: 10.1111/clr.12322. Epub 2013 Dec 26.
7
Cleaning potential of glycine air-flow application in an in vitro peri-implantitis model.甘氨酸气流应用在体外种植体周围炎模型中的清洁潜力。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Jun;24(6):666-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02445.x. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
8
In vitro cleaning potential of three implant debridement methods. Simulation of the non-surgical approach.三种种植体清创方法的体外清洁潜力。非手术方法的模拟。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Feb;28(2):151-155. doi: 10.1111/clr.12773. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
9
Effects of an amino acid buffered hypochlorite solution as an adjunctive to air-powder abrasion in open-flap surface decontamination of implants failed for peri-implantitis: an ex vivo randomized clinical trial.氨基酸缓冲次氯酸钠溶液作为空气喷砂辅助手段在种植体表面清创治疗种植体周围炎失败中的应用效果:一项离体随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Feb;27(2):827-835. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04608-5. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
10
Anatomical three-dimensional model with peri-implant defect for in vitro assessment of dental implant decontamination.用于评估种植体污染的种植体周围缺损的解剖三维模型。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024 Feb;10(1):e841. doi: 10.1002/cre2.841.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Affecting the Efficacy of Airflowing in Cleaning Implant Surfaces in a Surgical Peri-Implantitis Treatment Simulation-A Laboratory Study.在种植体周围炎治疗模拟中的外科手术中影响气流清洁种植体表面效果的因素——一项实验室研究
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025 Sep;36(9):1146-1158. doi: 10.1111/clr.14464. Epub 2025 Jun 22.
2
Efficacy of Air Powder Water-Jet Devices in Cleaning Implant Surfaces in a Non-Surgical Peri-Implantitis Treatment Simulation-A Laboratory Study.空气粉末水射流装置在非手术性种植体周围炎治疗模拟中清洁种植体表面的效果——一项实验室研究
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.1111/clr.14452.
3
In Vitro Assessment of the Potential Effect of Vertical Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Thickness on Nonsurgical and Surgical Implant Surface Decontamination Methods.
垂直种植体周围软组织厚度对非手术和手术种植体表面去污方法潜在影响的体外评估
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025 Jun;36(6):683-697. doi: 10.1111/clr.14415. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
4
Current understanding of the etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and management of peri-implant diseases: a narrative review for the consensus report of the Korean Academy of Periodontology.种植体周围疾病的病因、诊断、治疗及管理的当前认识:韩国牙周病学会共识报告的叙述性综述
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2024 Dec;54(6):377-392. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2403920196.
5
Comparison of the efficacy of Er,Cr:YSGG laser on oral biofilm removal from implant surfaces with various application times for the treatment of peri-implantitis defects: ex vivo study.不同应用时间的 Er,Cr:YSGG 激光去除种植体表面口腔生物膜治疗种植体周围炎缺损的疗效比较:体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 22;24(1):980. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04698-5.
6
Anatomical three-dimensional model with peri-implant defect for in vitro assessment of dental implant decontamination.用于评估种植体污染的种植体周围缺损的解剖三维模型。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024 Feb;10(1):e841. doi: 10.1002/cre2.841.
7
Comprehensive treatment protocol for peri-implantitis: an up-to date narrative review of the literature.种植体周围炎的综合治疗方案:文献的最新叙述性综述
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2024 Oct;54(5):295-308. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2303360168. Epub 2024 Jan 4.