Suppr超能文献

SAGES观点:专业医学协会、商业利益及利益冲突

SAGES perspective: professional medical associations, commercial interests, and conflicts of interest.

作者信息

Shadduck Phillip, Sylla Patricia, Schwarz Erin, Reinke Caroline, Denk Peter, Ginsberg Shelley, Asbun Horacio, Pryor Aurora

机构信息

Duke Regional Hospital & NC Specialty Hospital, Durham, NC, USA.

Mount Sinai Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):2517-2527. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09897-9. Epub 2023 Mar 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Professional medical associations (PMAs) have an essential role in advancing medical care and health. PMAs promote skills training, clinical standards, and other important educational activities. Most often, PMAs are not-for-profit entities that rely upon funding from industry to help cover the costs of these valuable activities. Equally important, innovation and progress in surgery require physician collaboration with industry throughout the product development process. SAGES has opined that, with appropriate Conflict of Interest (COI) disclosure and management processes, PMA educational activities can be both scientifically and ethically sound.

METHODS

SAGES has developed and implemented comprehensive and stringent processes for managing potential COI within the organization, at the annual meeting, and in developing educational offerings. This document reviews the SAGES COI processes and results 2009-2021.

RESULTS

Implementation of the SAGES COI disclosure and management processes reduced the reported perceived incidence of bias at the annual meeting from 4.4-6.2% (2008-2010) to 1.2-2.2% (2011-2013). Recent comparison of reported disclosures revealed a rise in number of speakers with financial relationships and an increase in reporting of disclosures in presentations without an associated increase in need for conflict resolution by the COI committee. Despite good overall adherence to COI policies, SAGES was recently cited for non-compliance with ACCME standards related to inclusion of faculty with ownership interest. This experience highlighted the potential for discordance in the interpretation of whether disclosures relate to specific CME content. SAGES COI processes have since been updated to reflect the more stringent 2020 ACCME Standards that exclude speakers and planners with ownership interest from any CME activity.

CONCLUSIONS

The SAGES experience with disclosure and mitigation of financial relationships highlights the challenges of validating the accuracy of physician disclosures and establishing the relevance of financial relationships to the content of accredited educational activities. SAGES will continue to streamline its COI disclosure process with specific focus on aligning all financial disclosures among the various reporting platforms.

摘要

背景

专业医学协会(PMA)在推进医疗保健和健康方面发挥着重要作用。PMA促进技能培训、临床标准及其他重要的教育活动。大多数情况下,PMA是非营利性实体,依靠行业资金来帮助支付这些有价值活动的费用。同样重要的是,手术领域的创新与进步需要医生在整个产品开发过程中与行业合作。美国胃肠内镜外科医师学会(SAGES)认为,通过适当的利益冲突(COI)披露和管理流程,PMA的教育活动在科学和伦理方面都可以是合理的。

方法

SAGES已制定并实施了全面且严格的流程,用于管理组织内部、年会期间以及开发教育课程时的潜在COI。本文回顾了SAGES 2009 - 2021年的COI流程及结果。

结果

SAGES的COI披露和管理流程的实施,使年会上报告的感知偏见发生率从2008 - 2010年的4.4% - 6.2%降至2011 - 2013年的1.2% - 2.2%。最近对报告披露情况的比较显示,有财务关系的演讲者数量有所增加,且在演讲中报告披露情况的次数也有所增加,但COI委员会解决冲突的需求并未相应增加。尽管总体上对COI政策的遵守情况良好,但SAGES最近因未遵守与包含有所有权权益教员相关的继续医学教育认证委员会(ACCME)标准而被提及。这一经历凸显了在解释披露是否与特定的继续医学教育内容相关时可能存在的不一致性。此后,SAGES的COI流程已更新,以反映2020年更严格的ACCME标准,该标准将有所有权权益的演讲者和规划者排除在任何继续医学教育活动之外。

结论

SAGES在披露和缓解财务关系方面的经验凸显了验证医生披露准确性以及确定财务关系与经认可的教育活动内容相关性的挑战。SAGES将继续简化其COI披露流程,特别关注使各个报告平台之间的所有财务披露保持一致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验