Bajorin Dean F, Witjes J Alfred, Gschwend Jürgen E, Schenker Michael, Valderrama Begoña P, Tomita Yoshihiko, Bamias Aristotelis, Lebret Thierry, Shariat Shahrokh F, Park Se Hoon, Ye Dingwei, Agerbaek Mads, Enting Deborah, McDermott Ray, Gajate Pablo, Peer Avivit, Milowsky Matthew I, Nosov Alexander, Antonio João Neif, Tupikowski Krzysztof, Toms Laurence, Fischer Bruce S, Qureshi Anila, Collette Sandra, Unsal-Kacmaz Keziban, Broughton Edward, Zardavas Dimitrios, Koon Henry B, Galsky Matthew D
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Future Oncol. 2023 Feb;19(6):413-426. doi: 10.2217/fon-2022-1294. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a summary of a paper published in a medical journal that describes the results of a study called CheckMate 274. This study looked at a new treatment for muscle-invasive urothelial cancer, a type of cancer found in the urinary tract that has spread from the inner lining of the urinary tract or bladder and into the surrounding muscle wall where it can then spread to other parts of the body. The standard treatment for muscle-invasive urothelial cancer is surgery to remove affected parts of the urinary tract. However, cancer returns in more than half of people after this surgery. Adjuvant therapy is given to people after surgery with muscle-invasive urothelial cancer with a goal to reduce the risk of the cancer coming back; however, at the time this study started, there was no standard adjuvant treatment.
WHAT HAPPENED IN THE STUDY?: In the CheckMate 274 study, researchers compared nivolumab with a placebo as an adjuvant treatment for people with muscle-invasive urothelial cancer. The aim of the study was to understand how well nivolumab worked to reduce the chance of the cancer returning after surgery. The study also looked at what side effects (unwanted or unexpected results or conditions that are possibly related to the use of a medication) people had with treatment.
WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: The results showed that people who received nivolumab versus placebo: Survived longer before the cancer was detected again, including people who had programmed death ligand-1 (shortened to PD-L1) on their cancer cells. Survived longer before a secondary cancer outside of the urinary tract was detected. Experienced no differences in health-related quality of life (the impact of the treatment on a person's mental and physical health). Had similar side effects to the people who received nivolumab in other studies. : NCT02632409 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
这是一篇发表在医学期刊上的论文摘要,该论文描述了一项名为CheckMate 274的研究结果。这项研究着眼于一种针对肌肉浸润性尿路上皮癌的新疗法,这种癌症发生于泌尿道,它从泌尿道或膀胱的内层扩散到周围肌肉壁,进而可能扩散至身体其他部位。肌肉浸润性尿路上皮癌的标准治疗方法是手术切除泌尿道的病变部位。然而,超过半数的患者术后癌症会复发。辅助治疗用于肌肉浸润性尿路上皮癌患者术后,目的是降低癌症复发风险;然而,在本研究开始时,尚无标准的辅助治疗方法。
该研究中发生了什么?:在CheckMate 274研究中,研究人员将纳武单抗与安慰剂作为肌肉浸润性尿路上皮癌患者的辅助治疗进行比较。该研究的目的是了解纳武单抗在降低术后癌症复发几率方面的效果如何。该研究还观察了患者在治疗过程中出现的副作用(与使用药物可能相关的不良或意外结果或状况)。
结果意味着什么?:结果显示,接受纳武单抗治疗的患者与接受安慰剂治疗的患者相比:在癌症再次被检测到之前存活时间更长,包括癌细胞上有程序性死亡配体-1(简称为PD-L1)的患者。在检测到泌尿道外的继发性癌症之前存活时间更长。在与健康相关的生活质量方面(治疗对患者心理和身体健康的影响)没有差异。与其他研究中接受纳武单抗治疗的患者有相似的副作用。:NCT02632409(ClinicalTrials.gov)。