School of Nursing, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China.
Emergency Department,The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2023 Jun;32(6):623-631. doi: 10.17219/acem/157241.
According to many reports, multidisciplinary comprehensive care alleviates Parkinson's disease (PD) more frequently than any other standard care, though the results were found to vary greatly.
A systematic literature search up to July 2022 was performed and 1234 related studies were evaluated. The chosen studies comprised 1115 subjects with PD who participated in baseline trials; 633 of them were under multidisciplinary comprehensive care, while 482 were under standard care. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated to measure the results of multidisciplinary comprehensive care for PD by the contentious and dichotomous approaches with a random or fixed influence model employed.
The use of multidisciplinary comprehensive care resulted in significantly better health-related quality of life (HRQL) (MD: -3.17; 95% CI: -5.98--0.35, p = 0.03) and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) score (MD: -5.25; 95% CI: -10.14--0.37, p = 0.04) compared to the standard care for subjects with PD. Nevertheless, no significant difference was found between multidisciplinary comprehensive care and standard care for subjects with PD regarding medication dosage (MD: 0.31; 95% CI: -0.72-1.34, p = 0.56) and caregiver strain (MD: -0.51; 95% CI: -1.69-0.67, p = 0.40).
Outpatient multidisciplinary comprehensive care models may improve patient-reported HRQL and UPDRS score; nevertheless, no significant difference was found in terms of medication dosage and caregiver strain compared to the standard care for subjects with PD. The small sample size of 2 out of 7 analyzed studies and the small number of studies in certain comparisons requires attention when analyzing the results.
根据许多报告,多学科综合护理比任何其他标准护理更能缓解帕金森病(PD),尽管结果差异很大。
系统地检索了截至 2022 年 7 月的文献,并评估了 1234 项相关研究。所选研究包括 1115 名参加基线试验的 PD 患者;其中 633 名接受多学科综合护理,482 名接受标准护理。采用随机或固定影响模型,通过有争议的和二分法方法计算比值比(ORs)和均数差值(MDs)及其 95%置信区间(95%CI),以衡量多学科综合护理对 PD 的效果。
与标准护理相比,多学科综合护理可显著改善 PD 患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQL)(MD:-3.17;95%CI:-5.98--0.35,p=0.03)和统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)评分(MD:-5.25;95%CI:-10.14--0.37,p=0.04)。然而,对于 PD 患者,多学科综合护理与标准护理在药物剂量(MD:0.31;95%CI:-0.72-1.34,p=0.56)和照顾者负担(MD:-0.51;95%CI:-1.69-0.67,p=0.40)方面无显著差异。
门诊多学科综合护理模式可能会改善患者报告的 HRQL 和 UPDRS 评分;然而,与 PD 患者的标准护理相比,在药物剂量和照顾者负担方面没有显著差异。在分析结果时,需要注意 7 项分析研究中有 2 项研究的样本量较小,某些比较研究数量较少。