Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Spine Deform. 2023 Jul;11(4):815-823. doi: 10.1007/s43390-023-00674-1. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
To evaluate the effectiveness of vancomycin prophylaxis on spinal implant metal types.
42 rabbits underwent posterior, single-level instrumentation at L5-L6 with stainless steel (n = 18), cobalt chrome (n = 12), or titanium (n = 12) wire. All implants were inoculated with 1 × 10 colony forming units (CFU) of methicillin-resistant S. Aureus (MRSA). In the intrawound vancomycin subgroup (n = 18, 6 from each metal type), 40 mg of vancomycin powder was placed in the wound. In the IV vancomycin subgroup (n = 6, all stainless steel), 15 mg/kg of IV vancomycin was given preoperatively. Local soft tissue and implants were harvested 1-week postoperatively and separately cultured.
Intrawound vancomycin significantly reduced the rate of soft tissue infection (44.4% vs 100%) and implant infection (27.8% vs 100%) (p < 0.001). Within the intrawound vancomycin subgroup, cobalt chrome implants were associated with higher median soft tissue MRSA growth (130 CFU) than stainless steel (0 CFU) or titanium (0 CFU) (p = 0.02). Cobalt chrome implants were also more likely to develop soft tissue MRSA infection (83.3%) as compared to stainless steel (16.7%) or titanium (33.3%) (p = 0.04). Median soft tissue MRSA growth among stainless steel implants without prophylaxis, with IV vancomycin, and with vancomycin powder was 1.18 × 10, 195, and 0 CFU, respectively. The rate of soft tissue MRSA infection without prophylaxis, with IV vancomycin, and with vancomycin powder was 100, 66.7, and 16.7%, respectively (p = 0.015).
Intrawound vancomycin is more effective than IV vancomycin and effectively reduces the risk of infection, but is less effective in cobalt chrome implants due to residual soft tissue infection.
评估万古霉素预防对脊柱植入物金属类型的有效性。
42 只兔子在 L5-L6 进行后路单节段器械固定,使用不锈钢(n=18)、钴铬(n=12)或钛(n=12)丝。所有植入物均接种 1×10 个形成单位(CFU)耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)。在伤口内万古霉素亚组(n=18,每组 6 只)中,将 40mg 万古霉素粉末置于伤口中。在静脉万古霉素亚组(n=6,均为不锈钢)中,术前给予 15mg/kg 静脉万古霉素。术后 1 周采集局部软组织和植入物进行分别培养。
伤口内万古霉素显著降低了软组织感染率(44.4%比 100%)和植入物感染率(27.8%比 100%)(p<0.001)。在伤口内万古霉素亚组中,钴铬植入物的软组织 MRSA 生长中位数(130CFU)高于不锈钢(0CFU)或钛(0CFU)(p=0.02)。与不锈钢(16.7%)或钛(33.3%)相比,钴铬植入物更容易发生软组织 MRSA 感染(83.3%)(p=0.04)。无预防措施、静脉万古霉素和万古霉素粉末组的不锈钢植入物的软组织 MRSA 生长中位数分别为 1.18×10、195 和 0CFU。无预防措施、静脉万古霉素和万古霉素粉末组的软组织 MRSA 感染率分别为 100%、66.7%和 16.7%(p=0.015)。
伤口内万古霉素比静脉万古霉素更有效,能有效降低感染风险,但在钴铬植入物中效果较差,因为残留的软组织感染。